Why didn't Saruman break Gandalf's staff on Orthanc as Gandalf broke Saruman's?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
43
down vote

favorite
7












In The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers after becoming Gandalf the White, Gandalf cast Saruman from the Order and the Council. He also got the power to break Saruman's staff, which was very powerful.



So when Saruman captured Gandalf the Grey on Orthanc, why didn't Saruman do the same? He meant to find the One Ring's location from Gandalf. He could have broken Gandalf's staff, thereby decreasing Gandalf's power.










share|improve this question




















  • 8




    I always assumed he wanted to turn Gandalf to join his cause. If Gandalf would lose his wand, he wouldn't be as useful. I got nothing to back that up though.
    – Mixxiphoid
    2 days ago










  • @Mixxiphoid He could get the One Ring's location from him. That could be done without his staff.
    – the-profile-that-was-promised
    2 days ago






  • 5




    Do we have reason to believe that Saruman did not break or confiscate Gandalf's staff, and Gandalf just picked up a new one in Rivendell after his escape from the roof? There is also the question of Gandalf's sword, Glamdring; is he not carrying it when he has his encounter with Saruman? In the movie it is on his horse, which is not Shadowfax, so why doesn't Saruman now have Glamdring?
    – Eric Lippert
    2 days ago












  • Somewhat related scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/85706/…
    – RedBaron
    yesterday










  • @EricLippert Well, for one thing Gandalf couldn’t just pick up any old stick, because – as we all know – the staff chooses the wizard. (No idea about Glamdring.)
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    16 hours ago

















up vote
43
down vote

favorite
7












In The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers after becoming Gandalf the White, Gandalf cast Saruman from the Order and the Council. He also got the power to break Saruman's staff, which was very powerful.



So when Saruman captured Gandalf the Grey on Orthanc, why didn't Saruman do the same? He meant to find the One Ring's location from Gandalf. He could have broken Gandalf's staff, thereby decreasing Gandalf's power.










share|improve this question




















  • 8




    I always assumed he wanted to turn Gandalf to join his cause. If Gandalf would lose his wand, he wouldn't be as useful. I got nothing to back that up though.
    – Mixxiphoid
    2 days ago










  • @Mixxiphoid He could get the One Ring's location from him. That could be done without his staff.
    – the-profile-that-was-promised
    2 days ago






  • 5




    Do we have reason to believe that Saruman did not break or confiscate Gandalf's staff, and Gandalf just picked up a new one in Rivendell after his escape from the roof? There is also the question of Gandalf's sword, Glamdring; is he not carrying it when he has his encounter with Saruman? In the movie it is on his horse, which is not Shadowfax, so why doesn't Saruman now have Glamdring?
    – Eric Lippert
    2 days ago












  • Somewhat related scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/85706/…
    – RedBaron
    yesterday










  • @EricLippert Well, for one thing Gandalf couldn’t just pick up any old stick, because – as we all know – the staff chooses the wizard. (No idea about Glamdring.)
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    16 hours ago













up vote
43
down vote

favorite
7









up vote
43
down vote

favorite
7






7





In The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers after becoming Gandalf the White, Gandalf cast Saruman from the Order and the Council. He also got the power to break Saruman's staff, which was very powerful.



So when Saruman captured Gandalf the Grey on Orthanc, why didn't Saruman do the same? He meant to find the One Ring's location from Gandalf. He could have broken Gandalf's staff, thereby decreasing Gandalf's power.










share|improve this question















In The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers after becoming Gandalf the White, Gandalf cast Saruman from the Order and the Council. He also got the power to break Saruman's staff, which was very powerful.



So when Saruman captured Gandalf the Grey on Orthanc, why didn't Saruman do the same? He meant to find the One Ring's location from Gandalf. He could have broken Gandalf's staff, thereby decreasing Gandalf's power.







tolkiens-legendarium the-lord-of-the-rings gandalf saruman






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









TheLethalCarrot

37.4k15203247




37.4k15203247










asked 2 days ago









the-profile-that-was-promised

5561411




5561411








  • 8




    I always assumed he wanted to turn Gandalf to join his cause. If Gandalf would lose his wand, he wouldn't be as useful. I got nothing to back that up though.
    – Mixxiphoid
    2 days ago










  • @Mixxiphoid He could get the One Ring's location from him. That could be done without his staff.
    – the-profile-that-was-promised
    2 days ago






  • 5




    Do we have reason to believe that Saruman did not break or confiscate Gandalf's staff, and Gandalf just picked up a new one in Rivendell after his escape from the roof? There is also the question of Gandalf's sword, Glamdring; is he not carrying it when he has his encounter with Saruman? In the movie it is on his horse, which is not Shadowfax, so why doesn't Saruman now have Glamdring?
    – Eric Lippert
    2 days ago












  • Somewhat related scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/85706/…
    – RedBaron
    yesterday










  • @EricLippert Well, for one thing Gandalf couldn’t just pick up any old stick, because – as we all know – the staff chooses the wizard. (No idea about Glamdring.)
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    16 hours ago














  • 8




    I always assumed he wanted to turn Gandalf to join his cause. If Gandalf would lose his wand, he wouldn't be as useful. I got nothing to back that up though.
    – Mixxiphoid
    2 days ago










  • @Mixxiphoid He could get the One Ring's location from him. That could be done without his staff.
    – the-profile-that-was-promised
    2 days ago






  • 5




    Do we have reason to believe that Saruman did not break or confiscate Gandalf's staff, and Gandalf just picked up a new one in Rivendell after his escape from the roof? There is also the question of Gandalf's sword, Glamdring; is he not carrying it when he has his encounter with Saruman? In the movie it is on his horse, which is not Shadowfax, so why doesn't Saruman now have Glamdring?
    – Eric Lippert
    2 days ago












  • Somewhat related scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/85706/…
    – RedBaron
    yesterday










  • @EricLippert Well, for one thing Gandalf couldn’t just pick up any old stick, because – as we all know – the staff chooses the wizard. (No idea about Glamdring.)
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    16 hours ago








8




8




I always assumed he wanted to turn Gandalf to join his cause. If Gandalf would lose his wand, he wouldn't be as useful. I got nothing to back that up though.
– Mixxiphoid
2 days ago




I always assumed he wanted to turn Gandalf to join his cause. If Gandalf would lose his wand, he wouldn't be as useful. I got nothing to back that up though.
– Mixxiphoid
2 days ago












@Mixxiphoid He could get the One Ring's location from him. That could be done without his staff.
– the-profile-that-was-promised
2 days ago




@Mixxiphoid He could get the One Ring's location from him. That could be done without his staff.
– the-profile-that-was-promised
2 days ago




5




5




Do we have reason to believe that Saruman did not break or confiscate Gandalf's staff, and Gandalf just picked up a new one in Rivendell after his escape from the roof? There is also the question of Gandalf's sword, Glamdring; is he not carrying it when he has his encounter with Saruman? In the movie it is on his horse, which is not Shadowfax, so why doesn't Saruman now have Glamdring?
– Eric Lippert
2 days ago






Do we have reason to believe that Saruman did not break or confiscate Gandalf's staff, and Gandalf just picked up a new one in Rivendell after his escape from the roof? There is also the question of Gandalf's sword, Glamdring; is he not carrying it when he has his encounter with Saruman? In the movie it is on his horse, which is not Shadowfax, so why doesn't Saruman now have Glamdring?
– Eric Lippert
2 days ago














Somewhat related scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/85706/…
– RedBaron
yesterday




Somewhat related scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/85706/…
– RedBaron
yesterday












@EricLippert Well, for one thing Gandalf couldn’t just pick up any old stick, because – as we all know – the staff chooses the wizard. (No idea about Glamdring.)
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
16 hours ago




@EricLippert Well, for one thing Gandalf couldn’t just pick up any old stick, because – as we all know – the staff chooses the wizard. (No idea about Glamdring.)
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
16 hours ago










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
56
down vote



accepted










A wizard's staff is symbolic rather than a source of actual power, and so breaking a wizard's staff has no effect on the wizard's power.



How do we know this? Because Gandalf was able to defeat the Balrog without his staff.




At that moment Gandalf lifted his staff, and crying aloud he smote the bridge before him. The staff broke asunder and fell from his hand.




This was before his battle with the Balrog.



Saruman therefore didn't break Gandalf's staff because there was no need for him to do so and also because doing so would not have accomplished anything.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Victim of Circumstance is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 10




    @Asif Iqubal: Symbolism, both for the good guys and to make the point to Saruman himself. While breaking Saruman's staff had no effect on Saruman's powers, it did make the point to S. that Gandalf, not he, was the more powerful. Remember, that Gandalf still hoped for S.'s redemption and aid in the fight against Sauron. Saruman understanding that he had lost his position as Chief Wizard was a necessary step in that direction. It also made the point to Rohan, the Ents and everyone else that Gandalf had changed. (Remember that G. was not allowed to lead by domination, people had to follow.)
    – Mark Olson
    2 days ago






  • 46




    I disagree. If Gandalf's staff was decorative, why did it broke after demolishing Moria bridge? Why did Gandalf insist to retain his staff during audience with Theoden?
    – user1643723
    2 days ago






  • 23




    +1 on @user1643723; Gandalf needed to trick/convince the guards into letting him keep his staff in Edoras. He defeated the Balrog using his sword (and the cold waters).
    – molnarm
    2 days ago






  • 33




    Certainly a wizard doesn't need his staff to perform magic...but that doesn't mean the staff is symbolic. Anymore than the elven rings were symbolic. Clearly these staves are important to these wizards, and equally clearly, Gandalf is empowered to break Saruman's stuff in a way that Saruman was not so empowered. The wizard's staff is a vestment of authority, and the source of that authority comes from the Valar and ultimately, Illuvatar. and as Saruman was corrupt and fallen, authority was granted to Mithrandir. So I've always read between the lines, anyway.
    – nunya
    2 days ago






  • 24




    The breaking of Saruman's staff serves to excommunicate him. It is a withdrawal of Saruman's divine authority, enacted by Gandalf, as the loyal earthly agent of the Valar.
    – nunya
    2 days ago




















up vote
21
down vote













Presumably because Gandalf was sent back by the Powers with greater power specifically for the purpose of fulfilling the role that Saruman had forsaken, to contest Sauron.



From The Two Towers (emphasis mine):




Naked I was sent back - for a brief time, until my task is done.




Then to Saruman later:




'Come back, Saruman!' Gandalf said in a commanding voice. To the amazement of the others, Saruman turned back as if dragged against his will...




Since the Istari were Maiar, an increase in power would only have come from some greater being (i.e. the Illuvatar) so Gandalf is able to do what he did to Saruman (a reversal of their earlier position) because he is an agent of a greater Power still, and was granted that authority by his divine master.






share|improve this answer



















  • 3




    Nitpick: Gandalf was not brought back by the valar but by Eru Ilúvatar himself.
    – Rad80
    yesterday










  • @Rad80 do you have a source? I don't recall that in the books/appendicies/silmarilion but I haven't read any of the other books (e.g. unfinished tales).
    – Jared Smith
    yesterday






  • 9




    It's in Tolkien's letters, I found out from this answer: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/109214/…
    – Rad80
    yesterday










  • @Rad80 thanks, edited.
    – Jared Smith
    yesterday


















up vote
6
down vote













I always saw breaking the staff as a sign of supremacy.



Saruman already outranked Gandalf when he defeated him. Breaking Gandalf's staff wouldn't serve any additional purpose; the higher-ranking wizard should have been expected to win anyway.



When Gandalf later defeats Saruman, Gandalf breaks the staff as a symbol that his power has become greater, and he assumes the dominant rank.



As to the staffs themselves... I think a wizard does gain benefit from their staff, but it's not because of power in the staff itself. It's merely the benefit you get from a tool that has become comfortable with long use, but still one you could make again if need be.






share|improve this answer























  • Yes, staff is a symbol of office rather than just a tool. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staff_of_office
    – Pete Kirkham
    yesterday


















up vote
5
down vote













Saruman didn't break the staff, because he managed to take it whole from Gandalf and kept it (check out the end of the fight where Saruman has both staffs).



When Gandalf flees Orthanc he does so without his staff (revisit the scene here) and later on gets another staff. This differs in the films from the books. The accounts of how he gets another staff in the movie universe differ a bit and maybe this is worth a separate question, but he clearly loses his staff in the fight with Saruman.



Somewhat authoritative sources for this answer are this IMDB FAQ (check out How did Gandalf get his staff back from Saruman? He simply leaps off of Orthanc without it) and the Lotr wiki.



The flight scene also shows that Saruman still hoped he could turn Gandalf until that moment, so it was reasonable to keep his staff intact, but out of reach of Gandalf. Also note that in the movie universe, wizards obviously can make use of the staffs of other wizards (perhaps less efficiently). So, even if he would not convince Gandalf it might be prudent to keep the staff just like you might keep a spare sword around, if you have it anyway.






share|improve this answer



















  • 7




    are we certain OP is asking about the films? Seems like it's re: the books
    – NKCampbell
    yesterday










  • @NKCampbell good point, for some reason I assumed it was clearly the movies, but you are right, there is no specific indication in that regard. Will see if I can later extend for the books.
    – Darkwing
    yesterday










  • The last paragraph is the key part here, +1. Saruman wanted Gandalf's help and hoped he would come around after a night thinking about the looming alternative.
    – Nathan Hughes
    yesterday


















up vote
3
down vote













Poetry and drama. Gandalf's line, "Saruman, your staff is broken," is the only quote I remember from The Two Towers. It is not a direct command, it is as just as much a comment on how the positions have changed between these two wizards as well as destructive magic.



The storyline now apparently finishes with Saruman and the struggle for Middle-earth now turns towards Mordor.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




narratorjay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1




    This, appears, to be an answer from an out of universe perspective whereas I got the impression the OP was after in universe answers. This is of course fine as an answer just though it was worth mentioning.
    – TheLethalCarrot
    2 days ago


















up vote
0
down vote













It might be that Saruman, possessing the staff of Gandalf, could have more control over him. While Gandalf broke his staff since he did not care about having control over Saruman.






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "186"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f199432%2fwhy-didnt-saruman-break-gandalfs-staff-on-orthanc-as-gandalf-broke-sarumans%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes








    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    56
    down vote



    accepted










    A wizard's staff is symbolic rather than a source of actual power, and so breaking a wizard's staff has no effect on the wizard's power.



    How do we know this? Because Gandalf was able to defeat the Balrog without his staff.




    At that moment Gandalf lifted his staff, and crying aloud he smote the bridge before him. The staff broke asunder and fell from his hand.




    This was before his battle with the Balrog.



    Saruman therefore didn't break Gandalf's staff because there was no need for him to do so and also because doing so would not have accomplished anything.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Victim of Circumstance is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.














    • 10




      @Asif Iqubal: Symbolism, both for the good guys and to make the point to Saruman himself. While breaking Saruman's staff had no effect on Saruman's powers, it did make the point to S. that Gandalf, not he, was the more powerful. Remember, that Gandalf still hoped for S.'s redemption and aid in the fight against Sauron. Saruman understanding that he had lost his position as Chief Wizard was a necessary step in that direction. It also made the point to Rohan, the Ents and everyone else that Gandalf had changed. (Remember that G. was not allowed to lead by domination, people had to follow.)
      – Mark Olson
      2 days ago






    • 46




      I disagree. If Gandalf's staff was decorative, why did it broke after demolishing Moria bridge? Why did Gandalf insist to retain his staff during audience with Theoden?
      – user1643723
      2 days ago






    • 23




      +1 on @user1643723; Gandalf needed to trick/convince the guards into letting him keep his staff in Edoras. He defeated the Balrog using his sword (and the cold waters).
      – molnarm
      2 days ago






    • 33




      Certainly a wizard doesn't need his staff to perform magic...but that doesn't mean the staff is symbolic. Anymore than the elven rings were symbolic. Clearly these staves are important to these wizards, and equally clearly, Gandalf is empowered to break Saruman's stuff in a way that Saruman was not so empowered. The wizard's staff is a vestment of authority, and the source of that authority comes from the Valar and ultimately, Illuvatar. and as Saruman was corrupt and fallen, authority was granted to Mithrandir. So I've always read between the lines, anyway.
      – nunya
      2 days ago






    • 24




      The breaking of Saruman's staff serves to excommunicate him. It is a withdrawal of Saruman's divine authority, enacted by Gandalf, as the loyal earthly agent of the Valar.
      – nunya
      2 days ago

















    up vote
    56
    down vote



    accepted










    A wizard's staff is symbolic rather than a source of actual power, and so breaking a wizard's staff has no effect on the wizard's power.



    How do we know this? Because Gandalf was able to defeat the Balrog without his staff.




    At that moment Gandalf lifted his staff, and crying aloud he smote the bridge before him. The staff broke asunder and fell from his hand.




    This was before his battle with the Balrog.



    Saruman therefore didn't break Gandalf's staff because there was no need for him to do so and also because doing so would not have accomplished anything.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Victim of Circumstance is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.














    • 10




      @Asif Iqubal: Symbolism, both for the good guys and to make the point to Saruman himself. While breaking Saruman's staff had no effect on Saruman's powers, it did make the point to S. that Gandalf, not he, was the more powerful. Remember, that Gandalf still hoped for S.'s redemption and aid in the fight against Sauron. Saruman understanding that he had lost his position as Chief Wizard was a necessary step in that direction. It also made the point to Rohan, the Ents and everyone else that Gandalf had changed. (Remember that G. was not allowed to lead by domination, people had to follow.)
      – Mark Olson
      2 days ago






    • 46




      I disagree. If Gandalf's staff was decorative, why did it broke after demolishing Moria bridge? Why did Gandalf insist to retain his staff during audience with Theoden?
      – user1643723
      2 days ago






    • 23




      +1 on @user1643723; Gandalf needed to trick/convince the guards into letting him keep his staff in Edoras. He defeated the Balrog using his sword (and the cold waters).
      – molnarm
      2 days ago






    • 33




      Certainly a wizard doesn't need his staff to perform magic...but that doesn't mean the staff is symbolic. Anymore than the elven rings were symbolic. Clearly these staves are important to these wizards, and equally clearly, Gandalf is empowered to break Saruman's stuff in a way that Saruman was not so empowered. The wizard's staff is a vestment of authority, and the source of that authority comes from the Valar and ultimately, Illuvatar. and as Saruman was corrupt and fallen, authority was granted to Mithrandir. So I've always read between the lines, anyway.
      – nunya
      2 days ago






    • 24




      The breaking of Saruman's staff serves to excommunicate him. It is a withdrawal of Saruman's divine authority, enacted by Gandalf, as the loyal earthly agent of the Valar.
      – nunya
      2 days ago















    up vote
    56
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    56
    down vote



    accepted






    A wizard's staff is symbolic rather than a source of actual power, and so breaking a wizard's staff has no effect on the wizard's power.



    How do we know this? Because Gandalf was able to defeat the Balrog without his staff.




    At that moment Gandalf lifted his staff, and crying aloud he smote the bridge before him. The staff broke asunder and fell from his hand.




    This was before his battle with the Balrog.



    Saruman therefore didn't break Gandalf's staff because there was no need for him to do so and also because doing so would not have accomplished anything.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Victim of Circumstance is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    A wizard's staff is symbolic rather than a source of actual power, and so breaking a wizard's staff has no effect on the wizard's power.



    How do we know this? Because Gandalf was able to defeat the Balrog without his staff.




    At that moment Gandalf lifted his staff, and crying aloud he smote the bridge before him. The staff broke asunder and fell from his hand.




    This was before his battle with the Balrog.



    Saruman therefore didn't break Gandalf's staff because there was no need for him to do so and also because doing so would not have accomplished anything.







    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Victim of Circumstance is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago









    Mat Cauthon

    15.5k474129




    15.5k474129






    New contributor




    Victim of Circumstance is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered 2 days ago









    Victim of Circumstance

    50233




    50233




    New contributor




    Victim of Circumstance is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    Victim of Circumstance is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    Victim of Circumstance is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.








    • 10




      @Asif Iqubal: Symbolism, both for the good guys and to make the point to Saruman himself. While breaking Saruman's staff had no effect on Saruman's powers, it did make the point to S. that Gandalf, not he, was the more powerful. Remember, that Gandalf still hoped for S.'s redemption and aid in the fight against Sauron. Saruman understanding that he had lost his position as Chief Wizard was a necessary step in that direction. It also made the point to Rohan, the Ents and everyone else that Gandalf had changed. (Remember that G. was not allowed to lead by domination, people had to follow.)
      – Mark Olson
      2 days ago






    • 46




      I disagree. If Gandalf's staff was decorative, why did it broke after demolishing Moria bridge? Why did Gandalf insist to retain his staff during audience with Theoden?
      – user1643723
      2 days ago






    • 23




      +1 on @user1643723; Gandalf needed to trick/convince the guards into letting him keep his staff in Edoras. He defeated the Balrog using his sword (and the cold waters).
      – molnarm
      2 days ago






    • 33




      Certainly a wizard doesn't need his staff to perform magic...but that doesn't mean the staff is symbolic. Anymore than the elven rings were symbolic. Clearly these staves are important to these wizards, and equally clearly, Gandalf is empowered to break Saruman's stuff in a way that Saruman was not so empowered. The wizard's staff is a vestment of authority, and the source of that authority comes from the Valar and ultimately, Illuvatar. and as Saruman was corrupt and fallen, authority was granted to Mithrandir. So I've always read between the lines, anyway.
      – nunya
      2 days ago






    • 24




      The breaking of Saruman's staff serves to excommunicate him. It is a withdrawal of Saruman's divine authority, enacted by Gandalf, as the loyal earthly agent of the Valar.
      – nunya
      2 days ago
















    • 10




      @Asif Iqubal: Symbolism, both for the good guys and to make the point to Saruman himself. While breaking Saruman's staff had no effect on Saruman's powers, it did make the point to S. that Gandalf, not he, was the more powerful. Remember, that Gandalf still hoped for S.'s redemption and aid in the fight against Sauron. Saruman understanding that he had lost his position as Chief Wizard was a necessary step in that direction. It also made the point to Rohan, the Ents and everyone else that Gandalf had changed. (Remember that G. was not allowed to lead by domination, people had to follow.)
      – Mark Olson
      2 days ago






    • 46




      I disagree. If Gandalf's staff was decorative, why did it broke after demolishing Moria bridge? Why did Gandalf insist to retain his staff during audience with Theoden?
      – user1643723
      2 days ago






    • 23




      +1 on @user1643723; Gandalf needed to trick/convince the guards into letting him keep his staff in Edoras. He defeated the Balrog using his sword (and the cold waters).
      – molnarm
      2 days ago






    • 33




      Certainly a wizard doesn't need his staff to perform magic...but that doesn't mean the staff is symbolic. Anymore than the elven rings were symbolic. Clearly these staves are important to these wizards, and equally clearly, Gandalf is empowered to break Saruman's stuff in a way that Saruman was not so empowered. The wizard's staff is a vestment of authority, and the source of that authority comes from the Valar and ultimately, Illuvatar. and as Saruman was corrupt and fallen, authority was granted to Mithrandir. So I've always read between the lines, anyway.
      – nunya
      2 days ago






    • 24




      The breaking of Saruman's staff serves to excommunicate him. It is a withdrawal of Saruman's divine authority, enacted by Gandalf, as the loyal earthly agent of the Valar.
      – nunya
      2 days ago










    10




    10




    @Asif Iqubal: Symbolism, both for the good guys and to make the point to Saruman himself. While breaking Saruman's staff had no effect on Saruman's powers, it did make the point to S. that Gandalf, not he, was the more powerful. Remember, that Gandalf still hoped for S.'s redemption and aid in the fight against Sauron. Saruman understanding that he had lost his position as Chief Wizard was a necessary step in that direction. It also made the point to Rohan, the Ents and everyone else that Gandalf had changed. (Remember that G. was not allowed to lead by domination, people had to follow.)
    – Mark Olson
    2 days ago




    @Asif Iqubal: Symbolism, both for the good guys and to make the point to Saruman himself. While breaking Saruman's staff had no effect on Saruman's powers, it did make the point to S. that Gandalf, not he, was the more powerful. Remember, that Gandalf still hoped for S.'s redemption and aid in the fight against Sauron. Saruman understanding that he had lost his position as Chief Wizard was a necessary step in that direction. It also made the point to Rohan, the Ents and everyone else that Gandalf had changed. (Remember that G. was not allowed to lead by domination, people had to follow.)
    – Mark Olson
    2 days ago




    46




    46




    I disagree. If Gandalf's staff was decorative, why did it broke after demolishing Moria bridge? Why did Gandalf insist to retain his staff during audience with Theoden?
    – user1643723
    2 days ago




    I disagree. If Gandalf's staff was decorative, why did it broke after demolishing Moria bridge? Why did Gandalf insist to retain his staff during audience with Theoden?
    – user1643723
    2 days ago




    23




    23




    +1 on @user1643723; Gandalf needed to trick/convince the guards into letting him keep his staff in Edoras. He defeated the Balrog using his sword (and the cold waters).
    – molnarm
    2 days ago




    +1 on @user1643723; Gandalf needed to trick/convince the guards into letting him keep his staff in Edoras. He defeated the Balrog using his sword (and the cold waters).
    – molnarm
    2 days ago




    33




    33




    Certainly a wizard doesn't need his staff to perform magic...but that doesn't mean the staff is symbolic. Anymore than the elven rings were symbolic. Clearly these staves are important to these wizards, and equally clearly, Gandalf is empowered to break Saruman's stuff in a way that Saruman was not so empowered. The wizard's staff is a vestment of authority, and the source of that authority comes from the Valar and ultimately, Illuvatar. and as Saruman was corrupt and fallen, authority was granted to Mithrandir. So I've always read between the lines, anyway.
    – nunya
    2 days ago




    Certainly a wizard doesn't need his staff to perform magic...but that doesn't mean the staff is symbolic. Anymore than the elven rings were symbolic. Clearly these staves are important to these wizards, and equally clearly, Gandalf is empowered to break Saruman's stuff in a way that Saruman was not so empowered. The wizard's staff is a vestment of authority, and the source of that authority comes from the Valar and ultimately, Illuvatar. and as Saruman was corrupt and fallen, authority was granted to Mithrandir. So I've always read between the lines, anyway.
    – nunya
    2 days ago




    24




    24




    The breaking of Saruman's staff serves to excommunicate him. It is a withdrawal of Saruman's divine authority, enacted by Gandalf, as the loyal earthly agent of the Valar.
    – nunya
    2 days ago






    The breaking of Saruman's staff serves to excommunicate him. It is a withdrawal of Saruman's divine authority, enacted by Gandalf, as the loyal earthly agent of the Valar.
    – nunya
    2 days ago














    up vote
    21
    down vote













    Presumably because Gandalf was sent back by the Powers with greater power specifically for the purpose of fulfilling the role that Saruman had forsaken, to contest Sauron.



    From The Two Towers (emphasis mine):




    Naked I was sent back - for a brief time, until my task is done.




    Then to Saruman later:




    'Come back, Saruman!' Gandalf said in a commanding voice. To the amazement of the others, Saruman turned back as if dragged against his will...




    Since the Istari were Maiar, an increase in power would only have come from some greater being (i.e. the Illuvatar) so Gandalf is able to do what he did to Saruman (a reversal of their earlier position) because he is an agent of a greater Power still, and was granted that authority by his divine master.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 3




      Nitpick: Gandalf was not brought back by the valar but by Eru Ilúvatar himself.
      – Rad80
      yesterday










    • @Rad80 do you have a source? I don't recall that in the books/appendicies/silmarilion but I haven't read any of the other books (e.g. unfinished tales).
      – Jared Smith
      yesterday






    • 9




      It's in Tolkien's letters, I found out from this answer: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/109214/…
      – Rad80
      yesterday










    • @Rad80 thanks, edited.
      – Jared Smith
      yesterday















    up vote
    21
    down vote













    Presumably because Gandalf was sent back by the Powers with greater power specifically for the purpose of fulfilling the role that Saruman had forsaken, to contest Sauron.



    From The Two Towers (emphasis mine):




    Naked I was sent back - for a brief time, until my task is done.




    Then to Saruman later:




    'Come back, Saruman!' Gandalf said in a commanding voice. To the amazement of the others, Saruman turned back as if dragged against his will...




    Since the Istari were Maiar, an increase in power would only have come from some greater being (i.e. the Illuvatar) so Gandalf is able to do what he did to Saruman (a reversal of their earlier position) because he is an agent of a greater Power still, and was granted that authority by his divine master.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 3




      Nitpick: Gandalf was not brought back by the valar but by Eru Ilúvatar himself.
      – Rad80
      yesterday










    • @Rad80 do you have a source? I don't recall that in the books/appendicies/silmarilion but I haven't read any of the other books (e.g. unfinished tales).
      – Jared Smith
      yesterday






    • 9




      It's in Tolkien's letters, I found out from this answer: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/109214/…
      – Rad80
      yesterday










    • @Rad80 thanks, edited.
      – Jared Smith
      yesterday













    up vote
    21
    down vote










    up vote
    21
    down vote









    Presumably because Gandalf was sent back by the Powers with greater power specifically for the purpose of fulfilling the role that Saruman had forsaken, to contest Sauron.



    From The Two Towers (emphasis mine):




    Naked I was sent back - for a brief time, until my task is done.




    Then to Saruman later:




    'Come back, Saruman!' Gandalf said in a commanding voice. To the amazement of the others, Saruman turned back as if dragged against his will...




    Since the Istari were Maiar, an increase in power would only have come from some greater being (i.e. the Illuvatar) so Gandalf is able to do what he did to Saruman (a reversal of their earlier position) because he is an agent of a greater Power still, and was granted that authority by his divine master.






    share|improve this answer














    Presumably because Gandalf was sent back by the Powers with greater power specifically for the purpose of fulfilling the role that Saruman had forsaken, to contest Sauron.



    From The Two Towers (emphasis mine):




    Naked I was sent back - for a brief time, until my task is done.




    Then to Saruman later:




    'Come back, Saruman!' Gandalf said in a commanding voice. To the amazement of the others, Saruman turned back as if dragged against his will...




    Since the Istari were Maiar, an increase in power would only have come from some greater being (i.e. the Illuvatar) so Gandalf is able to do what he did to Saruman (a reversal of their earlier position) because he is an agent of a greater Power still, and was granted that authority by his divine master.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered 2 days ago









    Jared Smith

    47328




    47328








    • 3




      Nitpick: Gandalf was not brought back by the valar but by Eru Ilúvatar himself.
      – Rad80
      yesterday










    • @Rad80 do you have a source? I don't recall that in the books/appendicies/silmarilion but I haven't read any of the other books (e.g. unfinished tales).
      – Jared Smith
      yesterday






    • 9




      It's in Tolkien's letters, I found out from this answer: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/109214/…
      – Rad80
      yesterday










    • @Rad80 thanks, edited.
      – Jared Smith
      yesterday














    • 3




      Nitpick: Gandalf was not brought back by the valar but by Eru Ilúvatar himself.
      – Rad80
      yesterday










    • @Rad80 do you have a source? I don't recall that in the books/appendicies/silmarilion but I haven't read any of the other books (e.g. unfinished tales).
      – Jared Smith
      yesterday






    • 9




      It's in Tolkien's letters, I found out from this answer: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/109214/…
      – Rad80
      yesterday










    • @Rad80 thanks, edited.
      – Jared Smith
      yesterday








    3




    3




    Nitpick: Gandalf was not brought back by the valar but by Eru Ilúvatar himself.
    – Rad80
    yesterday




    Nitpick: Gandalf was not brought back by the valar but by Eru Ilúvatar himself.
    – Rad80
    yesterday












    @Rad80 do you have a source? I don't recall that in the books/appendicies/silmarilion but I haven't read any of the other books (e.g. unfinished tales).
    – Jared Smith
    yesterday




    @Rad80 do you have a source? I don't recall that in the books/appendicies/silmarilion but I haven't read any of the other books (e.g. unfinished tales).
    – Jared Smith
    yesterday




    9




    9




    It's in Tolkien's letters, I found out from this answer: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/109214/…
    – Rad80
    yesterday




    It's in Tolkien's letters, I found out from this answer: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/109214/…
    – Rad80
    yesterday












    @Rad80 thanks, edited.
    – Jared Smith
    yesterday




    @Rad80 thanks, edited.
    – Jared Smith
    yesterday










    up vote
    6
    down vote













    I always saw breaking the staff as a sign of supremacy.



    Saruman already outranked Gandalf when he defeated him. Breaking Gandalf's staff wouldn't serve any additional purpose; the higher-ranking wizard should have been expected to win anyway.



    When Gandalf later defeats Saruman, Gandalf breaks the staff as a symbol that his power has become greater, and he assumes the dominant rank.



    As to the staffs themselves... I think a wizard does gain benefit from their staff, but it's not because of power in the staff itself. It's merely the benefit you get from a tool that has become comfortable with long use, but still one you could make again if need be.






    share|improve this answer























    • Yes, staff is a symbol of office rather than just a tool. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staff_of_office
      – Pete Kirkham
      yesterday















    up vote
    6
    down vote













    I always saw breaking the staff as a sign of supremacy.



    Saruman already outranked Gandalf when he defeated him. Breaking Gandalf's staff wouldn't serve any additional purpose; the higher-ranking wizard should have been expected to win anyway.



    When Gandalf later defeats Saruman, Gandalf breaks the staff as a symbol that his power has become greater, and he assumes the dominant rank.



    As to the staffs themselves... I think a wizard does gain benefit from their staff, but it's not because of power in the staff itself. It's merely the benefit you get from a tool that has become comfortable with long use, but still one you could make again if need be.






    share|improve this answer























    • Yes, staff is a symbol of office rather than just a tool. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staff_of_office
      – Pete Kirkham
      yesterday













    up vote
    6
    down vote










    up vote
    6
    down vote









    I always saw breaking the staff as a sign of supremacy.



    Saruman already outranked Gandalf when he defeated him. Breaking Gandalf's staff wouldn't serve any additional purpose; the higher-ranking wizard should have been expected to win anyway.



    When Gandalf later defeats Saruman, Gandalf breaks the staff as a symbol that his power has become greater, and he assumes the dominant rank.



    As to the staffs themselves... I think a wizard does gain benefit from their staff, but it's not because of power in the staff itself. It's merely the benefit you get from a tool that has become comfortable with long use, but still one you could make again if need be.






    share|improve this answer














    I always saw breaking the staff as a sign of supremacy.



    Saruman already outranked Gandalf when he defeated him. Breaking Gandalf's staff wouldn't serve any additional purpose; the higher-ranking wizard should have been expected to win anyway.



    When Gandalf later defeats Saruman, Gandalf breaks the staff as a symbol that his power has become greater, and he assumes the dominant rank.



    As to the staffs themselves... I think a wizard does gain benefit from their staff, but it's not because of power in the staff itself. It's merely the benefit you get from a tool that has become comfortable with long use, but still one you could make again if need be.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered yesterday









    Joel Coehoorn

    2,1321317




    2,1321317












    • Yes, staff is a symbol of office rather than just a tool. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staff_of_office
      – Pete Kirkham
      yesterday


















    • Yes, staff is a symbol of office rather than just a tool. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staff_of_office
      – Pete Kirkham
      yesterday
















    Yes, staff is a symbol of office rather than just a tool. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staff_of_office
    – Pete Kirkham
    yesterday




    Yes, staff is a symbol of office rather than just a tool. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staff_of_office
    – Pete Kirkham
    yesterday










    up vote
    5
    down vote













    Saruman didn't break the staff, because he managed to take it whole from Gandalf and kept it (check out the end of the fight where Saruman has both staffs).



    When Gandalf flees Orthanc he does so without his staff (revisit the scene here) and later on gets another staff. This differs in the films from the books. The accounts of how he gets another staff in the movie universe differ a bit and maybe this is worth a separate question, but he clearly loses his staff in the fight with Saruman.



    Somewhat authoritative sources for this answer are this IMDB FAQ (check out How did Gandalf get his staff back from Saruman? He simply leaps off of Orthanc without it) and the Lotr wiki.



    The flight scene also shows that Saruman still hoped he could turn Gandalf until that moment, so it was reasonable to keep his staff intact, but out of reach of Gandalf. Also note that in the movie universe, wizards obviously can make use of the staffs of other wizards (perhaps less efficiently). So, even if he would not convince Gandalf it might be prudent to keep the staff just like you might keep a spare sword around, if you have it anyway.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 7




      are we certain OP is asking about the films? Seems like it's re: the books
      – NKCampbell
      yesterday










    • @NKCampbell good point, for some reason I assumed it was clearly the movies, but you are right, there is no specific indication in that regard. Will see if I can later extend for the books.
      – Darkwing
      yesterday










    • The last paragraph is the key part here, +1. Saruman wanted Gandalf's help and hoped he would come around after a night thinking about the looming alternative.
      – Nathan Hughes
      yesterday















    up vote
    5
    down vote













    Saruman didn't break the staff, because he managed to take it whole from Gandalf and kept it (check out the end of the fight where Saruman has both staffs).



    When Gandalf flees Orthanc he does so without his staff (revisit the scene here) and later on gets another staff. This differs in the films from the books. The accounts of how he gets another staff in the movie universe differ a bit and maybe this is worth a separate question, but he clearly loses his staff in the fight with Saruman.



    Somewhat authoritative sources for this answer are this IMDB FAQ (check out How did Gandalf get his staff back from Saruman? He simply leaps off of Orthanc without it) and the Lotr wiki.



    The flight scene also shows that Saruman still hoped he could turn Gandalf until that moment, so it was reasonable to keep his staff intact, but out of reach of Gandalf. Also note that in the movie universe, wizards obviously can make use of the staffs of other wizards (perhaps less efficiently). So, even if he would not convince Gandalf it might be prudent to keep the staff just like you might keep a spare sword around, if you have it anyway.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 7




      are we certain OP is asking about the films? Seems like it's re: the books
      – NKCampbell
      yesterday










    • @NKCampbell good point, for some reason I assumed it was clearly the movies, but you are right, there is no specific indication in that regard. Will see if I can later extend for the books.
      – Darkwing
      yesterday










    • The last paragraph is the key part here, +1. Saruman wanted Gandalf's help and hoped he would come around after a night thinking about the looming alternative.
      – Nathan Hughes
      yesterday













    up vote
    5
    down vote










    up vote
    5
    down vote









    Saruman didn't break the staff, because he managed to take it whole from Gandalf and kept it (check out the end of the fight where Saruman has both staffs).



    When Gandalf flees Orthanc he does so without his staff (revisit the scene here) and later on gets another staff. This differs in the films from the books. The accounts of how he gets another staff in the movie universe differ a bit and maybe this is worth a separate question, but he clearly loses his staff in the fight with Saruman.



    Somewhat authoritative sources for this answer are this IMDB FAQ (check out How did Gandalf get his staff back from Saruman? He simply leaps off of Orthanc without it) and the Lotr wiki.



    The flight scene also shows that Saruman still hoped he could turn Gandalf until that moment, so it was reasonable to keep his staff intact, but out of reach of Gandalf. Also note that in the movie universe, wizards obviously can make use of the staffs of other wizards (perhaps less efficiently). So, even if he would not convince Gandalf it might be prudent to keep the staff just like you might keep a spare sword around, if you have it anyway.






    share|improve this answer














    Saruman didn't break the staff, because he managed to take it whole from Gandalf and kept it (check out the end of the fight where Saruman has both staffs).



    When Gandalf flees Orthanc he does so without his staff (revisit the scene here) and later on gets another staff. This differs in the films from the books. The accounts of how he gets another staff in the movie universe differ a bit and maybe this is worth a separate question, but he clearly loses his staff in the fight with Saruman.



    Somewhat authoritative sources for this answer are this IMDB FAQ (check out How did Gandalf get his staff back from Saruman? He simply leaps off of Orthanc without it) and the Lotr wiki.



    The flight scene also shows that Saruman still hoped he could turn Gandalf until that moment, so it was reasonable to keep his staff intact, but out of reach of Gandalf. Also note that in the movie universe, wizards obviously can make use of the staffs of other wizards (perhaps less efficiently). So, even if he would not convince Gandalf it might be prudent to keep the staff just like you might keep a spare sword around, if you have it anyway.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday









    Community

    1




    1










    answered yesterday









    Darkwing

    26416




    26416








    • 7




      are we certain OP is asking about the films? Seems like it's re: the books
      – NKCampbell
      yesterday










    • @NKCampbell good point, for some reason I assumed it was clearly the movies, but you are right, there is no specific indication in that regard. Will see if I can later extend for the books.
      – Darkwing
      yesterday










    • The last paragraph is the key part here, +1. Saruman wanted Gandalf's help and hoped he would come around after a night thinking about the looming alternative.
      – Nathan Hughes
      yesterday














    • 7




      are we certain OP is asking about the films? Seems like it's re: the books
      – NKCampbell
      yesterday










    • @NKCampbell good point, for some reason I assumed it was clearly the movies, but you are right, there is no specific indication in that regard. Will see if I can later extend for the books.
      – Darkwing
      yesterday










    • The last paragraph is the key part here, +1. Saruman wanted Gandalf's help and hoped he would come around after a night thinking about the looming alternative.
      – Nathan Hughes
      yesterday








    7




    7




    are we certain OP is asking about the films? Seems like it's re: the books
    – NKCampbell
    yesterday




    are we certain OP is asking about the films? Seems like it's re: the books
    – NKCampbell
    yesterday












    @NKCampbell good point, for some reason I assumed it was clearly the movies, but you are right, there is no specific indication in that regard. Will see if I can later extend for the books.
    – Darkwing
    yesterday




    @NKCampbell good point, for some reason I assumed it was clearly the movies, but you are right, there is no specific indication in that regard. Will see if I can later extend for the books.
    – Darkwing
    yesterday












    The last paragraph is the key part here, +1. Saruman wanted Gandalf's help and hoped he would come around after a night thinking about the looming alternative.
    – Nathan Hughes
    yesterday




    The last paragraph is the key part here, +1. Saruman wanted Gandalf's help and hoped he would come around after a night thinking about the looming alternative.
    – Nathan Hughes
    yesterday










    up vote
    3
    down vote













    Poetry and drama. Gandalf's line, "Saruman, your staff is broken," is the only quote I remember from The Two Towers. It is not a direct command, it is as just as much a comment on how the positions have changed between these two wizards as well as destructive magic.



    The storyline now apparently finishes with Saruman and the struggle for Middle-earth now turns towards Mordor.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    narratorjay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.














    • 1




      This, appears, to be an answer from an out of universe perspective whereas I got the impression the OP was after in universe answers. This is of course fine as an answer just though it was worth mentioning.
      – TheLethalCarrot
      2 days ago















    up vote
    3
    down vote













    Poetry and drama. Gandalf's line, "Saruman, your staff is broken," is the only quote I remember from The Two Towers. It is not a direct command, it is as just as much a comment on how the positions have changed between these two wizards as well as destructive magic.



    The storyline now apparently finishes with Saruman and the struggle for Middle-earth now turns towards Mordor.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    narratorjay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.














    • 1




      This, appears, to be an answer from an out of universe perspective whereas I got the impression the OP was after in universe answers. This is of course fine as an answer just though it was worth mentioning.
      – TheLethalCarrot
      2 days ago













    up vote
    3
    down vote










    up vote
    3
    down vote









    Poetry and drama. Gandalf's line, "Saruman, your staff is broken," is the only quote I remember from The Two Towers. It is not a direct command, it is as just as much a comment on how the positions have changed between these two wizards as well as destructive magic.



    The storyline now apparently finishes with Saruman and the struggle for Middle-earth now turns towards Mordor.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    narratorjay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    Poetry and drama. Gandalf's line, "Saruman, your staff is broken," is the only quote I remember from The Two Towers. It is not a direct command, it is as just as much a comment on how the positions have changed between these two wizards as well as destructive magic.



    The storyline now apparently finishes with Saruman and the struggle for Middle-earth now turns towards Mordor.







    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    narratorjay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago









    TheLethalCarrot

    37.4k15203247




    37.4k15203247






    New contributor




    narratorjay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered 2 days ago









    narratorjay

    391




    391




    New contributor




    narratorjay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    narratorjay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    narratorjay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.








    • 1




      This, appears, to be an answer from an out of universe perspective whereas I got the impression the OP was after in universe answers. This is of course fine as an answer just though it was worth mentioning.
      – TheLethalCarrot
      2 days ago














    • 1




      This, appears, to be an answer from an out of universe perspective whereas I got the impression the OP was after in universe answers. This is of course fine as an answer just though it was worth mentioning.
      – TheLethalCarrot
      2 days ago








    1




    1




    This, appears, to be an answer from an out of universe perspective whereas I got the impression the OP was after in universe answers. This is of course fine as an answer just though it was worth mentioning.
    – TheLethalCarrot
    2 days ago




    This, appears, to be an answer from an out of universe perspective whereas I got the impression the OP was after in universe answers. This is of course fine as an answer just though it was worth mentioning.
    – TheLethalCarrot
    2 days ago










    up vote
    0
    down vote













    It might be that Saruman, possessing the staff of Gandalf, could have more control over him. While Gandalf broke his staff since he did not care about having control over Saruman.






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      It might be that Saruman, possessing the staff of Gandalf, could have more control over him. While Gandalf broke his staff since he did not care about having control over Saruman.






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        It might be that Saruman, possessing the staff of Gandalf, could have more control over him. While Gandalf broke his staff since he did not care about having control over Saruman.






        share|improve this answer












        It might be that Saruman, possessing the staff of Gandalf, could have more control over him. While Gandalf broke his staff since he did not care about having control over Saruman.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        მამუკა ჯიბლაძე

        1514




        1514






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f199432%2fwhy-didnt-saruman-break-gandalfs-staff-on-orthanc-as-gandalf-broke-sarumans%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Eastern Orthodox Church

            Understanding the information contained in the Deep Space Network XML data?

            Ross-on-Wye