Replace all NA values for variable with one row equal to 0












6














Slightly difficult to phrase, as far as I saw none of the similar questions answered my problem.



I have a data.frame such as:



df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 4),
val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3))

df1

id val
1 a NA
2 a NA
3 a NA
4 a NA
5 b 1
6 b 2
7 b 2
8 b 3


and I want to get rid of all the NA values (easy enough using e.g. filter() ) but make sure that if this removes all of one id value (in this case it removes every instance of "a") that one extra row is inserted of (e.g.) a = 0



so that:



  id val
1 a 0
2 b 1
3 b 2
4 b 2
5 b 3


obviously easy enough to do this in a roundabout way but I was wondering if there's a tidy/elegant way to do this. I thought tidyr::complete() might help but not entirely sure how to apply it to a case like this



I don't care about the order of the rows



Cheers!










share|improve this question






















  • So you want to add rows with 0 only if all the values for particular id is 0?
    – Ronak Shah
    2 hours ago










  • only if they're all NA for a particular id
    – Robert Hickman
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    @RobertHickman There seems to be some confusion about your desired output. Could you update your question with the expected output based on this df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4), val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3)) ? Thanks to @VivekKalyanarangan for the data.
    – markus
    1 hour ago
















6














Slightly difficult to phrase, as far as I saw none of the similar questions answered my problem.



I have a data.frame such as:



df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 4),
val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3))

df1

id val
1 a NA
2 a NA
3 a NA
4 a NA
5 b 1
6 b 2
7 b 2
8 b 3


and I want to get rid of all the NA values (easy enough using e.g. filter() ) but make sure that if this removes all of one id value (in this case it removes every instance of "a") that one extra row is inserted of (e.g.) a = 0



so that:



  id val
1 a 0
2 b 1
3 b 2
4 b 2
5 b 3


obviously easy enough to do this in a roundabout way but I was wondering if there's a tidy/elegant way to do this. I thought tidyr::complete() might help but not entirely sure how to apply it to a case like this



I don't care about the order of the rows



Cheers!










share|improve this question






















  • So you want to add rows with 0 only if all the values for particular id is 0?
    – Ronak Shah
    2 hours ago










  • only if they're all NA for a particular id
    – Robert Hickman
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    @RobertHickman There seems to be some confusion about your desired output. Could you update your question with the expected output based on this df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4), val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3)) ? Thanks to @VivekKalyanarangan for the data.
    – markus
    1 hour ago














6












6








6







Slightly difficult to phrase, as far as I saw none of the similar questions answered my problem.



I have a data.frame such as:



df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 4),
val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3))

df1

id val
1 a NA
2 a NA
3 a NA
4 a NA
5 b 1
6 b 2
7 b 2
8 b 3


and I want to get rid of all the NA values (easy enough using e.g. filter() ) but make sure that if this removes all of one id value (in this case it removes every instance of "a") that one extra row is inserted of (e.g.) a = 0



so that:



  id val
1 a 0
2 b 1
3 b 2
4 b 2
5 b 3


obviously easy enough to do this in a roundabout way but I was wondering if there's a tidy/elegant way to do this. I thought tidyr::complete() might help but not entirely sure how to apply it to a case like this



I don't care about the order of the rows



Cheers!










share|improve this question













Slightly difficult to phrase, as far as I saw none of the similar questions answered my problem.



I have a data.frame such as:



df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 4),
val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3))

df1

id val
1 a NA
2 a NA
3 a NA
4 a NA
5 b 1
6 b 2
7 b 2
8 b 3


and I want to get rid of all the NA values (easy enough using e.g. filter() ) but make sure that if this removes all of one id value (in this case it removes every instance of "a") that one extra row is inserted of (e.g.) a = 0



so that:



  id val
1 a 0
2 b 1
3 b 2
4 b 2
5 b 3


obviously easy enough to do this in a roundabout way but I was wondering if there's a tidy/elegant way to do this. I thought tidyr::complete() might help but not entirely sure how to apply it to a case like this



I don't care about the order of the rows



Cheers!







r na complete






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









Robert Hickman

13519




13519












  • So you want to add rows with 0 only if all the values for particular id is 0?
    – Ronak Shah
    2 hours ago










  • only if they're all NA for a particular id
    – Robert Hickman
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    @RobertHickman There seems to be some confusion about your desired output. Could you update your question with the expected output based on this df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4), val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3)) ? Thanks to @VivekKalyanarangan for the data.
    – markus
    1 hour ago


















  • So you want to add rows with 0 only if all the values for particular id is 0?
    – Ronak Shah
    2 hours ago










  • only if they're all NA for a particular id
    – Robert Hickman
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    @RobertHickman There seems to be some confusion about your desired output. Could you update your question with the expected output based on this df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4), val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3)) ? Thanks to @VivekKalyanarangan for the data.
    – markus
    1 hour ago
















So you want to add rows with 0 only if all the values for particular id is 0?
– Ronak Shah
2 hours ago




So you want to add rows with 0 only if all the values for particular id is 0?
– Ronak Shah
2 hours ago












only if they're all NA for a particular id
– Robert Hickman
2 hours ago




only if they're all NA for a particular id
– Robert Hickman
2 hours ago




1




1




@RobertHickman There seems to be some confusion about your desired output. Could you update your question with the expected output based on this df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4), val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3)) ? Thanks to @VivekKalyanarangan for the data.
– markus
1 hour ago




@RobertHickman There seems to be some confusion about your desired output. Could you update your question with the expected output based on this df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4), val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3)) ? Thanks to @VivekKalyanarangan for the data.
– markus
1 hour ago












7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes


















3














Another idea using dplyr,



library(dplyr)

df1 %>%
group_by(id) %>%
mutate(val = ifelse(row_number() == 1 & all(is.na(val)), 0, val)) %>%
na.omit()


which gives,




# A tibble: 5 x 2
# Groups: id [2]
id val
<fct> <dbl>
1 a 0
2 b 1
3 b 2
4 b 2
5 b 3






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    (+1) Seems like the most robust answer here. Would be marginally more concise using replace(val, all(is.na(val)) * 1, 0) instead of the ifelse(...).
    – Mikko Marttila
    38 mins ago










  • @MikkoMarttila Good suggestion. I usually try and avoid ifelse in general
    – Sotos
    33 mins ago





















2














df1[is.na(df1)] <- 0
df1[!(duplicated(df1$id) & df1$val == 0), ]

id val
1 a 0
5 b 1
6 b 2
7 b 2
8 b 3





share|improve this answer

















  • 5




    Would this work for ids that contain NAs and non-NAs? Try with df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 2), val = c(NA, 1, 2, 3))
    – markus
    2 hours ago












  • I think this is the best so far (I'll leave it open for another hour or so to see) would maybe change to df %>% replace(is.na(.), 0) %>% .[!(duplicated(.$id) & .$val == 0), ]
    – Robert Hickman
    1 hour ago





















2














We may do



df1 %>% group_by(id) %>% do(if(all(is.na(.$val))) replace(.[1, ], 2, 0) else na.omit(.))
# A tibble: 5 x 2
# Groups: id [2]
# id val
# <fct> <dbl>
# 1 a 0
# 2 b 1
# 3 b 2
# 4 b 2
# 5 b 3


After grouping by id, if everything in val is NA, then we leave only the first row with the second element replaced by 0, otherwise the same data is returned after applying na.omit.



In a more readable format that would be



df1 %>% group_by(id) %>% 
do(if(all(is.na(.$val))) data.frame(id = .$id[1], val = 0) else na.omit(.))


(Here I presume that you indeed want to get rid of all NA values; otherwise there is no need for na.omit.)






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    @markus, right, I had assumed that that's the goal. Thanks!
    – Julius Vainora
    1 hour ago












  • It looks like op wants to retain the first row and replace the val column of that row with 0 where all val is NA for a group. Check my ans pls. Agree with @markus, it does seem tricky
    – Vivek Kalyanarangan
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @VivekKalyanarangan, that's what I initially thought, but "and I want to get rid of all the NA values" suggests otherwise.
    – Julius Vainora
    1 hour ago



















1














Base R option is to find groups with all NAs and transform them by changing their val to 0 and select only unique rows so that there is only one row per group. We rbind this dataframe with the groups which are !all_NA.



all_NA <- with(df1, ave(is.na(val), id, FUN = all))
rbind(unique(transform(df1[all_NA, ], val = 0)), df1[!all_NA, ])

# id val
#1 a 0
#5 b 1
#6 b 2
#7 b 2
#8 b 3




dplyr option looks ugly but one way is to make two groups of dataframes one with groups of all NA values and other with groups of all non-NA values. For groups with all NA values we add row with it's id and val as 0 and bind this to the other group.



library(dplyr)

bind_rows(df1 %>%
group_by(id) %>%
filter(all(!is.na(val))),
df1 %>%
group_by(id) %>%
filter(all(is.na(val))) %>%
ungroup() %>%
summarise(id = unique(id),
val = 0)) %>%
arrange(id)


# id val
# <fct> <dbl>
#1 a 0
#2 b 1
#3 b 2
#4 b 2
#5 b 3





share|improve this answer































    1














    Changed the df to make example more exhaustive -



    df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4),
    val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3))
    library(dplyr)
    df1 %>%
    group_by(id) %>%
    mutate(case=sum(is.na(val))==n(), row_num=row_number() ) %>%
    mutate(val=ifelse(is.na(val)&case,0,val)) %>%
    filter( !(case&row_num!=1) ) %>%
    select(id, val)


    Output



      id      val
    <fct> <dbl>
    1 a 0
    2 b 1
    3 b 2
    4 b 2
    5 b 3
    6 c NA
    7 c 2
    8 c NA
    9 c 3





    share|improve this answer





























      1














      Here is an option too:



      df1 %>% 
      mutate_if(is.factor,as.character) %>%
      mutate_all(funs(replace(.,is.na(.),0))) %>%
      slice(4:nrow(.))


      This gives:



       id val
      1 a 0
      2 b 1
      3 b 2
      4 b 2
      5 b 3


      Alternative:



      df1 %>% 
      mutate_if(is.factor,as.character) %>%
      mutate_all(funs(replace(.,is.na(.),0))) %>%
      unique()





      share|improve this answer



















      • 3




        where did 4 come from?
        – Sotos
        1 hour ago










      • The solution produces four 0s. We're only interested in having 1?
        – NelsonGon
        1 hour ago










      • What if one group has 4 and another 3?
        – Sotos
        1 hour ago










      • Sorry I only answered based on the question. Maybe then we could twist things up, not sure though!
        – NelsonGon
        1 hour ago










      • Consider this example - df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4), val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3)) I think here OP wants to remove NA values for A group only, not the rest
        – Vivek Kalyanarangan
        1 hour ago



















      0














      Here is a base R solution.



      res <- lapply(split(df1, df1$id), function(DF){
      if(anyNA(DF$val)) {
      i <- is.na(DF$val)
      DF$val[i] <- 0
      DF <- rbind(DF[i & !duplicated(DF[i, ]), ], DF[!i, ])
      }
      DF
      })
      res <- do.call(rbind, res)
      row.names(res) <- NULL
      res
      # id val
      #1 a 0
      #2 b 1
      #3 b 2
      #4 b 2
      #5 b 3


      Edit.



      A dplyr solution could be the following.
      It was tested with the original dataset posted by the OP, with the dataset in Vivek Kalyanarangan's answer and with the dataset in markus' comment, renamed df2 and df3, respectively.



      library(dplyr)

      na2zero <- function(DF){
      DF %>%
      group_by(id) %>%
      mutate(val = ifelse(is.na(val), 0, val),
      crit = val == 0 & duplicated(val)) %>%
      filter(!crit) %>%
      select(-crit)
      }

      na2zero(df1)
      na2zero(df2)
      na2zero(df3)





      share|improve this answer























      • Rui, try with df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 2), val = c(NA, 1, 2, 3)). Unfortunately your solution doesn't return a data frame with only three rows.
        – markus
        1 hour ago










      • @markus No, it doesn't. The NA is replaced by a 0 and the other value of val is not NA so both must be in the output. At least that's how I'm understanding the OP's problem.
        – Rui Barradas
        1 hour ago










      • Fair enough. People are reading the question differently.
        – markus
        17 mins ago











      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54022536%2freplace-all-na-values-for-variable-with-one-row-equal-to-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      7 Answers
      7






      active

      oldest

      votes








      7 Answers
      7






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      Another idea using dplyr,



      library(dplyr)

      df1 %>%
      group_by(id) %>%
      mutate(val = ifelse(row_number() == 1 & all(is.na(val)), 0, val)) %>%
      na.omit()


      which gives,




      # A tibble: 5 x 2
      # Groups: id [2]
      id val
      <fct> <dbl>
      1 a 0
      2 b 1
      3 b 2
      4 b 2
      5 b 3






      share|improve this answer

















      • 1




        (+1) Seems like the most robust answer here. Would be marginally more concise using replace(val, all(is.na(val)) * 1, 0) instead of the ifelse(...).
        – Mikko Marttila
        38 mins ago










      • @MikkoMarttila Good suggestion. I usually try and avoid ifelse in general
        – Sotos
        33 mins ago


















      3














      Another idea using dplyr,



      library(dplyr)

      df1 %>%
      group_by(id) %>%
      mutate(val = ifelse(row_number() == 1 & all(is.na(val)), 0, val)) %>%
      na.omit()


      which gives,




      # A tibble: 5 x 2
      # Groups: id [2]
      id val
      <fct> <dbl>
      1 a 0
      2 b 1
      3 b 2
      4 b 2
      5 b 3






      share|improve this answer

















      • 1




        (+1) Seems like the most robust answer here. Would be marginally more concise using replace(val, all(is.na(val)) * 1, 0) instead of the ifelse(...).
        – Mikko Marttila
        38 mins ago










      • @MikkoMarttila Good suggestion. I usually try and avoid ifelse in general
        – Sotos
        33 mins ago
















      3












      3








      3






      Another idea using dplyr,



      library(dplyr)

      df1 %>%
      group_by(id) %>%
      mutate(val = ifelse(row_number() == 1 & all(is.na(val)), 0, val)) %>%
      na.omit()


      which gives,




      # A tibble: 5 x 2
      # Groups: id [2]
      id val
      <fct> <dbl>
      1 a 0
      2 b 1
      3 b 2
      4 b 2
      5 b 3






      share|improve this answer












      Another idea using dplyr,



      library(dplyr)

      df1 %>%
      group_by(id) %>%
      mutate(val = ifelse(row_number() == 1 & all(is.na(val)), 0, val)) %>%
      na.omit()


      which gives,




      # A tibble: 5 x 2
      # Groups: id [2]
      id val
      <fct> <dbl>
      1 a 0
      2 b 1
      3 b 2
      4 b 2
      5 b 3







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 1 hour ago









      Sotos

      28.1k51640




      28.1k51640








      • 1




        (+1) Seems like the most robust answer here. Would be marginally more concise using replace(val, all(is.na(val)) * 1, 0) instead of the ifelse(...).
        – Mikko Marttila
        38 mins ago










      • @MikkoMarttila Good suggestion. I usually try and avoid ifelse in general
        – Sotos
        33 mins ago
















      • 1




        (+1) Seems like the most robust answer here. Would be marginally more concise using replace(val, all(is.na(val)) * 1, 0) instead of the ifelse(...).
        – Mikko Marttila
        38 mins ago










      • @MikkoMarttila Good suggestion. I usually try and avoid ifelse in general
        – Sotos
        33 mins ago










      1




      1




      (+1) Seems like the most robust answer here. Would be marginally more concise using replace(val, all(is.na(val)) * 1, 0) instead of the ifelse(...).
      – Mikko Marttila
      38 mins ago




      (+1) Seems like the most robust answer here. Would be marginally more concise using replace(val, all(is.na(val)) * 1, 0) instead of the ifelse(...).
      – Mikko Marttila
      38 mins ago












      @MikkoMarttila Good suggestion. I usually try and avoid ifelse in general
      – Sotos
      33 mins ago






      @MikkoMarttila Good suggestion. I usually try and avoid ifelse in general
      – Sotos
      33 mins ago















      2














      df1[is.na(df1)] <- 0
      df1[!(duplicated(df1$id) & df1$val == 0), ]

      id val
      1 a 0
      5 b 1
      6 b 2
      7 b 2
      8 b 3





      share|improve this answer

















      • 5




        Would this work for ids that contain NAs and non-NAs? Try with df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 2), val = c(NA, 1, 2, 3))
        – markus
        2 hours ago












      • I think this is the best so far (I'll leave it open for another hour or so to see) would maybe change to df %>% replace(is.na(.), 0) %>% .[!(duplicated(.$id) & .$val == 0), ]
        – Robert Hickman
        1 hour ago


















      2














      df1[is.na(df1)] <- 0
      df1[!(duplicated(df1$id) & df1$val == 0), ]

      id val
      1 a 0
      5 b 1
      6 b 2
      7 b 2
      8 b 3





      share|improve this answer

















      • 5




        Would this work for ids that contain NAs and non-NAs? Try with df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 2), val = c(NA, 1, 2, 3))
        – markus
        2 hours ago












      • I think this is the best so far (I'll leave it open for another hour or so to see) would maybe change to df %>% replace(is.na(.), 0) %>% .[!(duplicated(.$id) & .$val == 0), ]
        – Robert Hickman
        1 hour ago
















      2












      2








      2






      df1[is.na(df1)] <- 0
      df1[!(duplicated(df1$id) & df1$val == 0), ]

      id val
      1 a 0
      5 b 1
      6 b 2
      7 b 2
      8 b 3





      share|improve this answer












      df1[is.na(df1)] <- 0
      df1[!(duplicated(df1$id) & df1$val == 0), ]

      id val
      1 a 0
      5 b 1
      6 b 2
      7 b 2
      8 b 3






      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 2 hours ago









      Adamm

      832517




      832517








      • 5




        Would this work for ids that contain NAs and non-NAs? Try with df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 2), val = c(NA, 1, 2, 3))
        – markus
        2 hours ago












      • I think this is the best so far (I'll leave it open for another hour or so to see) would maybe change to df %>% replace(is.na(.), 0) %>% .[!(duplicated(.$id) & .$val == 0), ]
        – Robert Hickman
        1 hour ago
















      • 5




        Would this work for ids that contain NAs and non-NAs? Try with df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 2), val = c(NA, 1, 2, 3))
        – markus
        2 hours ago












      • I think this is the best so far (I'll leave it open for another hour or so to see) would maybe change to df %>% replace(is.na(.), 0) %>% .[!(duplicated(.$id) & .$val == 0), ]
        – Robert Hickman
        1 hour ago










      5




      5




      Would this work for ids that contain NAs and non-NAs? Try with df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 2), val = c(NA, 1, 2, 3))
      – markus
      2 hours ago






      Would this work for ids that contain NAs and non-NAs? Try with df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 2), val = c(NA, 1, 2, 3))
      – markus
      2 hours ago














      I think this is the best so far (I'll leave it open for another hour or so to see) would maybe change to df %>% replace(is.na(.), 0) %>% .[!(duplicated(.$id) & .$val == 0), ]
      – Robert Hickman
      1 hour ago






      I think this is the best so far (I'll leave it open for another hour or so to see) would maybe change to df %>% replace(is.na(.), 0) %>% .[!(duplicated(.$id) & .$val == 0), ]
      – Robert Hickman
      1 hour ago













      2














      We may do



      df1 %>% group_by(id) %>% do(if(all(is.na(.$val))) replace(.[1, ], 2, 0) else na.omit(.))
      # A tibble: 5 x 2
      # Groups: id [2]
      # id val
      # <fct> <dbl>
      # 1 a 0
      # 2 b 1
      # 3 b 2
      # 4 b 2
      # 5 b 3


      After grouping by id, if everything in val is NA, then we leave only the first row with the second element replaced by 0, otherwise the same data is returned after applying na.omit.



      In a more readable format that would be



      df1 %>% group_by(id) %>% 
      do(if(all(is.na(.$val))) data.frame(id = .$id[1], val = 0) else na.omit(.))


      (Here I presume that you indeed want to get rid of all NA values; otherwise there is no need for na.omit.)






      share|improve this answer



















      • 1




        @markus, right, I had assumed that that's the goal. Thanks!
        – Julius Vainora
        1 hour ago












      • It looks like op wants to retain the first row and replace the val column of that row with 0 where all val is NA for a group. Check my ans pls. Agree with @markus, it does seem tricky
        – Vivek Kalyanarangan
        1 hour ago






      • 1




        @VivekKalyanarangan, that's what I initially thought, but "and I want to get rid of all the NA values" suggests otherwise.
        – Julius Vainora
        1 hour ago
















      2














      We may do



      df1 %>% group_by(id) %>% do(if(all(is.na(.$val))) replace(.[1, ], 2, 0) else na.omit(.))
      # A tibble: 5 x 2
      # Groups: id [2]
      # id val
      # <fct> <dbl>
      # 1 a 0
      # 2 b 1
      # 3 b 2
      # 4 b 2
      # 5 b 3


      After grouping by id, if everything in val is NA, then we leave only the first row with the second element replaced by 0, otherwise the same data is returned after applying na.omit.



      In a more readable format that would be



      df1 %>% group_by(id) %>% 
      do(if(all(is.na(.$val))) data.frame(id = .$id[1], val = 0) else na.omit(.))


      (Here I presume that you indeed want to get rid of all NA values; otherwise there is no need for na.omit.)






      share|improve this answer



















      • 1




        @markus, right, I had assumed that that's the goal. Thanks!
        – Julius Vainora
        1 hour ago












      • It looks like op wants to retain the first row and replace the val column of that row with 0 where all val is NA for a group. Check my ans pls. Agree with @markus, it does seem tricky
        – Vivek Kalyanarangan
        1 hour ago






      • 1




        @VivekKalyanarangan, that's what I initially thought, but "and I want to get rid of all the NA values" suggests otherwise.
        – Julius Vainora
        1 hour ago














      2












      2








      2






      We may do



      df1 %>% group_by(id) %>% do(if(all(is.na(.$val))) replace(.[1, ], 2, 0) else na.omit(.))
      # A tibble: 5 x 2
      # Groups: id [2]
      # id val
      # <fct> <dbl>
      # 1 a 0
      # 2 b 1
      # 3 b 2
      # 4 b 2
      # 5 b 3


      After grouping by id, if everything in val is NA, then we leave only the first row with the second element replaced by 0, otherwise the same data is returned after applying na.omit.



      In a more readable format that would be



      df1 %>% group_by(id) %>% 
      do(if(all(is.na(.$val))) data.frame(id = .$id[1], val = 0) else na.omit(.))


      (Here I presume that you indeed want to get rid of all NA values; otherwise there is no need for na.omit.)






      share|improve this answer














      We may do



      df1 %>% group_by(id) %>% do(if(all(is.na(.$val))) replace(.[1, ], 2, 0) else na.omit(.))
      # A tibble: 5 x 2
      # Groups: id [2]
      # id val
      # <fct> <dbl>
      # 1 a 0
      # 2 b 1
      # 3 b 2
      # 4 b 2
      # 5 b 3


      After grouping by id, if everything in val is NA, then we leave only the first row with the second element replaced by 0, otherwise the same data is returned after applying na.omit.



      In a more readable format that would be



      df1 %>% group_by(id) %>% 
      do(if(all(is.na(.$val))) data.frame(id = .$id[1], val = 0) else na.omit(.))


      (Here I presume that you indeed want to get rid of all NA values; otherwise there is no need for na.omit.)







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 1 hour ago

























      answered 1 hour ago









      Julius Vainora

      32.6k75979




      32.6k75979








      • 1




        @markus, right, I had assumed that that's the goal. Thanks!
        – Julius Vainora
        1 hour ago












      • It looks like op wants to retain the first row and replace the val column of that row with 0 where all val is NA for a group. Check my ans pls. Agree with @markus, it does seem tricky
        – Vivek Kalyanarangan
        1 hour ago






      • 1




        @VivekKalyanarangan, that's what I initially thought, but "and I want to get rid of all the NA values" suggests otherwise.
        – Julius Vainora
        1 hour ago














      • 1




        @markus, right, I had assumed that that's the goal. Thanks!
        – Julius Vainora
        1 hour ago












      • It looks like op wants to retain the first row and replace the val column of that row with 0 where all val is NA for a group. Check my ans pls. Agree with @markus, it does seem tricky
        – Vivek Kalyanarangan
        1 hour ago






      • 1




        @VivekKalyanarangan, that's what I initially thought, but "and I want to get rid of all the NA values" suggests otherwise.
        – Julius Vainora
        1 hour ago








      1




      1




      @markus, right, I had assumed that that's the goal. Thanks!
      – Julius Vainora
      1 hour ago






      @markus, right, I had assumed that that's the goal. Thanks!
      – Julius Vainora
      1 hour ago














      It looks like op wants to retain the first row and replace the val column of that row with 0 where all val is NA for a group. Check my ans pls. Agree with @markus, it does seem tricky
      – Vivek Kalyanarangan
      1 hour ago




      It looks like op wants to retain the first row and replace the val column of that row with 0 where all val is NA for a group. Check my ans pls. Agree with @markus, it does seem tricky
      – Vivek Kalyanarangan
      1 hour ago




      1




      1




      @VivekKalyanarangan, that's what I initially thought, but "and I want to get rid of all the NA values" suggests otherwise.
      – Julius Vainora
      1 hour ago




      @VivekKalyanarangan, that's what I initially thought, but "and I want to get rid of all the NA values" suggests otherwise.
      – Julius Vainora
      1 hour ago











      1














      Base R option is to find groups with all NAs and transform them by changing their val to 0 and select only unique rows so that there is only one row per group. We rbind this dataframe with the groups which are !all_NA.



      all_NA <- with(df1, ave(is.na(val), id, FUN = all))
      rbind(unique(transform(df1[all_NA, ], val = 0)), df1[!all_NA, ])

      # id val
      #1 a 0
      #5 b 1
      #6 b 2
      #7 b 2
      #8 b 3




      dplyr option looks ugly but one way is to make two groups of dataframes one with groups of all NA values and other with groups of all non-NA values. For groups with all NA values we add row with it's id and val as 0 and bind this to the other group.



      library(dplyr)

      bind_rows(df1 %>%
      group_by(id) %>%
      filter(all(!is.na(val))),
      df1 %>%
      group_by(id) %>%
      filter(all(is.na(val))) %>%
      ungroup() %>%
      summarise(id = unique(id),
      val = 0)) %>%
      arrange(id)


      # id val
      # <fct> <dbl>
      #1 a 0
      #2 b 1
      #3 b 2
      #4 b 2
      #5 b 3





      share|improve this answer




























        1














        Base R option is to find groups with all NAs and transform them by changing their val to 0 and select only unique rows so that there is only one row per group. We rbind this dataframe with the groups which are !all_NA.



        all_NA <- with(df1, ave(is.na(val), id, FUN = all))
        rbind(unique(transform(df1[all_NA, ], val = 0)), df1[!all_NA, ])

        # id val
        #1 a 0
        #5 b 1
        #6 b 2
        #7 b 2
        #8 b 3




        dplyr option looks ugly but one way is to make two groups of dataframes one with groups of all NA values and other with groups of all non-NA values. For groups with all NA values we add row with it's id and val as 0 and bind this to the other group.



        library(dplyr)

        bind_rows(df1 %>%
        group_by(id) %>%
        filter(all(!is.na(val))),
        df1 %>%
        group_by(id) %>%
        filter(all(is.na(val))) %>%
        ungroup() %>%
        summarise(id = unique(id),
        val = 0)) %>%
        arrange(id)


        # id val
        # <fct> <dbl>
        #1 a 0
        #2 b 1
        #3 b 2
        #4 b 2
        #5 b 3





        share|improve this answer


























          1












          1








          1






          Base R option is to find groups with all NAs and transform them by changing their val to 0 and select only unique rows so that there is only one row per group. We rbind this dataframe with the groups which are !all_NA.



          all_NA <- with(df1, ave(is.na(val), id, FUN = all))
          rbind(unique(transform(df1[all_NA, ], val = 0)), df1[!all_NA, ])

          # id val
          #1 a 0
          #5 b 1
          #6 b 2
          #7 b 2
          #8 b 3




          dplyr option looks ugly but one way is to make two groups of dataframes one with groups of all NA values and other with groups of all non-NA values. For groups with all NA values we add row with it's id and val as 0 and bind this to the other group.



          library(dplyr)

          bind_rows(df1 %>%
          group_by(id) %>%
          filter(all(!is.na(val))),
          df1 %>%
          group_by(id) %>%
          filter(all(is.na(val))) %>%
          ungroup() %>%
          summarise(id = unique(id),
          val = 0)) %>%
          arrange(id)


          # id val
          # <fct> <dbl>
          #1 a 0
          #2 b 1
          #3 b 2
          #4 b 2
          #5 b 3





          share|improve this answer














          Base R option is to find groups with all NAs and transform them by changing their val to 0 and select only unique rows so that there is only one row per group. We rbind this dataframe with the groups which are !all_NA.



          all_NA <- with(df1, ave(is.na(val), id, FUN = all))
          rbind(unique(transform(df1[all_NA, ], val = 0)), df1[!all_NA, ])

          # id val
          #1 a 0
          #5 b 1
          #6 b 2
          #7 b 2
          #8 b 3




          dplyr option looks ugly but one way is to make two groups of dataframes one with groups of all NA values and other with groups of all non-NA values. For groups with all NA values we add row with it's id and val as 0 and bind this to the other group.



          library(dplyr)

          bind_rows(df1 %>%
          group_by(id) %>%
          filter(all(!is.na(val))),
          df1 %>%
          group_by(id) %>%
          filter(all(is.na(val))) %>%
          ungroup() %>%
          summarise(id = unique(id),
          val = 0)) %>%
          arrange(id)


          # id val
          # <fct> <dbl>
          #1 a 0
          #2 b 1
          #3 b 2
          #4 b 2
          #5 b 3






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 2 hours ago









          Ronak Shah

          32.6k103753




          32.6k103753























              1














              Changed the df to make example more exhaustive -



              df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4),
              val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3))
              library(dplyr)
              df1 %>%
              group_by(id) %>%
              mutate(case=sum(is.na(val))==n(), row_num=row_number() ) %>%
              mutate(val=ifelse(is.na(val)&case,0,val)) %>%
              filter( !(case&row_num!=1) ) %>%
              select(id, val)


              Output



                id      val
              <fct> <dbl>
              1 a 0
              2 b 1
              3 b 2
              4 b 2
              5 b 3
              6 c NA
              7 c 2
              8 c NA
              9 c 3





              share|improve this answer


























                1














                Changed the df to make example more exhaustive -



                df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4),
                val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3))
                library(dplyr)
                df1 %>%
                group_by(id) %>%
                mutate(case=sum(is.na(val))==n(), row_num=row_number() ) %>%
                mutate(val=ifelse(is.na(val)&case,0,val)) %>%
                filter( !(case&row_num!=1) ) %>%
                select(id, val)


                Output



                  id      val
                <fct> <dbl>
                1 a 0
                2 b 1
                3 b 2
                4 b 2
                5 b 3
                6 c NA
                7 c 2
                8 c NA
                9 c 3





                share|improve this answer
























                  1












                  1








                  1






                  Changed the df to make example more exhaustive -



                  df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4),
                  val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3))
                  library(dplyr)
                  df1 %>%
                  group_by(id) %>%
                  mutate(case=sum(is.na(val))==n(), row_num=row_number() ) %>%
                  mutate(val=ifelse(is.na(val)&case,0,val)) %>%
                  filter( !(case&row_num!=1) ) %>%
                  select(id, val)


                  Output



                    id      val
                  <fct> <dbl>
                  1 a 0
                  2 b 1
                  3 b 2
                  4 b 2
                  5 b 3
                  6 c NA
                  7 c 2
                  8 c NA
                  9 c 3





                  share|improve this answer












                  Changed the df to make example more exhaustive -



                  df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4),
                  val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3))
                  library(dplyr)
                  df1 %>%
                  group_by(id) %>%
                  mutate(case=sum(is.na(val))==n(), row_num=row_number() ) %>%
                  mutate(val=ifelse(is.na(val)&case,0,val)) %>%
                  filter( !(case&row_num!=1) ) %>%
                  select(id, val)


                  Output



                    id      val
                  <fct> <dbl>
                  1 a 0
                  2 b 1
                  3 b 2
                  4 b 2
                  5 b 3
                  6 c NA
                  7 c 2
                  8 c NA
                  9 c 3






                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  Vivek Kalyanarangan

                  4,8811827




                  4,8811827























                      1














                      Here is an option too:



                      df1 %>% 
                      mutate_if(is.factor,as.character) %>%
                      mutate_all(funs(replace(.,is.na(.),0))) %>%
                      slice(4:nrow(.))


                      This gives:



                       id val
                      1 a 0
                      2 b 1
                      3 b 2
                      4 b 2
                      5 b 3


                      Alternative:



                      df1 %>% 
                      mutate_if(is.factor,as.character) %>%
                      mutate_all(funs(replace(.,is.na(.),0))) %>%
                      unique()





                      share|improve this answer



















                      • 3




                        where did 4 come from?
                        – Sotos
                        1 hour ago










                      • The solution produces four 0s. We're only interested in having 1?
                        – NelsonGon
                        1 hour ago










                      • What if one group has 4 and another 3?
                        – Sotos
                        1 hour ago










                      • Sorry I only answered based on the question. Maybe then we could twist things up, not sure though!
                        – NelsonGon
                        1 hour ago










                      • Consider this example - df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4), val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3)) I think here OP wants to remove NA values for A group only, not the rest
                        – Vivek Kalyanarangan
                        1 hour ago
















                      1














                      Here is an option too:



                      df1 %>% 
                      mutate_if(is.factor,as.character) %>%
                      mutate_all(funs(replace(.,is.na(.),0))) %>%
                      slice(4:nrow(.))


                      This gives:



                       id val
                      1 a 0
                      2 b 1
                      3 b 2
                      4 b 2
                      5 b 3


                      Alternative:



                      df1 %>% 
                      mutate_if(is.factor,as.character) %>%
                      mutate_all(funs(replace(.,is.na(.),0))) %>%
                      unique()





                      share|improve this answer



















                      • 3




                        where did 4 come from?
                        – Sotos
                        1 hour ago










                      • The solution produces four 0s. We're only interested in having 1?
                        – NelsonGon
                        1 hour ago










                      • What if one group has 4 and another 3?
                        – Sotos
                        1 hour ago










                      • Sorry I only answered based on the question. Maybe then we could twist things up, not sure though!
                        – NelsonGon
                        1 hour ago










                      • Consider this example - df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4), val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3)) I think here OP wants to remove NA values for A group only, not the rest
                        – Vivek Kalyanarangan
                        1 hour ago














                      1












                      1








                      1






                      Here is an option too:



                      df1 %>% 
                      mutate_if(is.factor,as.character) %>%
                      mutate_all(funs(replace(.,is.na(.),0))) %>%
                      slice(4:nrow(.))


                      This gives:



                       id val
                      1 a 0
                      2 b 1
                      3 b 2
                      4 b 2
                      5 b 3


                      Alternative:



                      df1 %>% 
                      mutate_if(is.factor,as.character) %>%
                      mutate_all(funs(replace(.,is.na(.),0))) %>%
                      unique()





                      share|improve this answer














                      Here is an option too:



                      df1 %>% 
                      mutate_if(is.factor,as.character) %>%
                      mutate_all(funs(replace(.,is.na(.),0))) %>%
                      slice(4:nrow(.))


                      This gives:



                       id val
                      1 a 0
                      2 b 1
                      3 b 2
                      4 b 2
                      5 b 3


                      Alternative:



                      df1 %>% 
                      mutate_if(is.factor,as.character) %>%
                      mutate_all(funs(replace(.,is.na(.),0))) %>%
                      unique()






                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 1 hour ago

























                      answered 1 hour ago









                      NelsonGon

                      815217




                      815217








                      • 3




                        where did 4 come from?
                        – Sotos
                        1 hour ago










                      • The solution produces four 0s. We're only interested in having 1?
                        – NelsonGon
                        1 hour ago










                      • What if one group has 4 and another 3?
                        – Sotos
                        1 hour ago










                      • Sorry I only answered based on the question. Maybe then we could twist things up, not sure though!
                        – NelsonGon
                        1 hour ago










                      • Consider this example - df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4), val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3)) I think here OP wants to remove NA values for A group only, not the rest
                        – Vivek Kalyanarangan
                        1 hour ago














                      • 3




                        where did 4 come from?
                        – Sotos
                        1 hour ago










                      • The solution produces four 0s. We're only interested in having 1?
                        – NelsonGon
                        1 hour ago










                      • What if one group has 4 and another 3?
                        – Sotos
                        1 hour ago










                      • Sorry I only answered based on the question. Maybe then we could twist things up, not sure though!
                        – NelsonGon
                        1 hour ago










                      • Consider this example - df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4), val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3)) I think here OP wants to remove NA values for A group only, not the rest
                        – Vivek Kalyanarangan
                        1 hour ago








                      3




                      3




                      where did 4 come from?
                      – Sotos
                      1 hour ago




                      where did 4 come from?
                      – Sotos
                      1 hour ago












                      The solution produces four 0s. We're only interested in having 1?
                      – NelsonGon
                      1 hour ago




                      The solution produces four 0s. We're only interested in having 1?
                      – NelsonGon
                      1 hour ago












                      What if one group has 4 and another 3?
                      – Sotos
                      1 hour ago




                      What if one group has 4 and another 3?
                      – Sotos
                      1 hour ago












                      Sorry I only answered based on the question. Maybe then we could twist things up, not sure though!
                      – NelsonGon
                      1 hour ago




                      Sorry I only answered based on the question. Maybe then we could twist things up, not sure though!
                      – NelsonGon
                      1 hour ago












                      Consider this example - df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4), val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3)) I think here OP wants to remove NA values for A group only, not the rest
                      – Vivek Kalyanarangan
                      1 hour ago




                      Consider this example - df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b","c"), each = 4), val = c(NA, NA, NA, NA, 1, 2, 2, 3,NA,2,NA,3)) I think here OP wants to remove NA values for A group only, not the rest
                      – Vivek Kalyanarangan
                      1 hour ago











                      0














                      Here is a base R solution.



                      res <- lapply(split(df1, df1$id), function(DF){
                      if(anyNA(DF$val)) {
                      i <- is.na(DF$val)
                      DF$val[i] <- 0
                      DF <- rbind(DF[i & !duplicated(DF[i, ]), ], DF[!i, ])
                      }
                      DF
                      })
                      res <- do.call(rbind, res)
                      row.names(res) <- NULL
                      res
                      # id val
                      #1 a 0
                      #2 b 1
                      #3 b 2
                      #4 b 2
                      #5 b 3


                      Edit.



                      A dplyr solution could be the following.
                      It was tested with the original dataset posted by the OP, with the dataset in Vivek Kalyanarangan's answer and with the dataset in markus' comment, renamed df2 and df3, respectively.



                      library(dplyr)

                      na2zero <- function(DF){
                      DF %>%
                      group_by(id) %>%
                      mutate(val = ifelse(is.na(val), 0, val),
                      crit = val == 0 & duplicated(val)) %>%
                      filter(!crit) %>%
                      select(-crit)
                      }

                      na2zero(df1)
                      na2zero(df2)
                      na2zero(df3)





                      share|improve this answer























                      • Rui, try with df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 2), val = c(NA, 1, 2, 3)). Unfortunately your solution doesn't return a data frame with only three rows.
                        – markus
                        1 hour ago










                      • @markus No, it doesn't. The NA is replaced by a 0 and the other value of val is not NA so both must be in the output. At least that's how I'm understanding the OP's problem.
                        – Rui Barradas
                        1 hour ago










                      • Fair enough. People are reading the question differently.
                        – markus
                        17 mins ago
















                      0














                      Here is a base R solution.



                      res <- lapply(split(df1, df1$id), function(DF){
                      if(anyNA(DF$val)) {
                      i <- is.na(DF$val)
                      DF$val[i] <- 0
                      DF <- rbind(DF[i & !duplicated(DF[i, ]), ], DF[!i, ])
                      }
                      DF
                      })
                      res <- do.call(rbind, res)
                      row.names(res) <- NULL
                      res
                      # id val
                      #1 a 0
                      #2 b 1
                      #3 b 2
                      #4 b 2
                      #5 b 3


                      Edit.



                      A dplyr solution could be the following.
                      It was tested with the original dataset posted by the OP, with the dataset in Vivek Kalyanarangan's answer and with the dataset in markus' comment, renamed df2 and df3, respectively.



                      library(dplyr)

                      na2zero <- function(DF){
                      DF %>%
                      group_by(id) %>%
                      mutate(val = ifelse(is.na(val), 0, val),
                      crit = val == 0 & duplicated(val)) %>%
                      filter(!crit) %>%
                      select(-crit)
                      }

                      na2zero(df1)
                      na2zero(df2)
                      na2zero(df3)





                      share|improve this answer























                      • Rui, try with df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 2), val = c(NA, 1, 2, 3)). Unfortunately your solution doesn't return a data frame with only three rows.
                        – markus
                        1 hour ago










                      • @markus No, it doesn't. The NA is replaced by a 0 and the other value of val is not NA so both must be in the output. At least that's how I'm understanding the OP's problem.
                        – Rui Barradas
                        1 hour ago










                      • Fair enough. People are reading the question differently.
                        – markus
                        17 mins ago














                      0












                      0








                      0






                      Here is a base R solution.



                      res <- lapply(split(df1, df1$id), function(DF){
                      if(anyNA(DF$val)) {
                      i <- is.na(DF$val)
                      DF$val[i] <- 0
                      DF <- rbind(DF[i & !duplicated(DF[i, ]), ], DF[!i, ])
                      }
                      DF
                      })
                      res <- do.call(rbind, res)
                      row.names(res) <- NULL
                      res
                      # id val
                      #1 a 0
                      #2 b 1
                      #3 b 2
                      #4 b 2
                      #5 b 3


                      Edit.



                      A dplyr solution could be the following.
                      It was tested with the original dataset posted by the OP, with the dataset in Vivek Kalyanarangan's answer and with the dataset in markus' comment, renamed df2 and df3, respectively.



                      library(dplyr)

                      na2zero <- function(DF){
                      DF %>%
                      group_by(id) %>%
                      mutate(val = ifelse(is.na(val), 0, val),
                      crit = val == 0 & duplicated(val)) %>%
                      filter(!crit) %>%
                      select(-crit)
                      }

                      na2zero(df1)
                      na2zero(df2)
                      na2zero(df3)





                      share|improve this answer














                      Here is a base R solution.



                      res <- lapply(split(df1, df1$id), function(DF){
                      if(anyNA(DF$val)) {
                      i <- is.na(DF$val)
                      DF$val[i] <- 0
                      DF <- rbind(DF[i & !duplicated(DF[i, ]), ], DF[!i, ])
                      }
                      DF
                      })
                      res <- do.call(rbind, res)
                      row.names(res) <- NULL
                      res
                      # id val
                      #1 a 0
                      #2 b 1
                      #3 b 2
                      #4 b 2
                      #5 b 3


                      Edit.



                      A dplyr solution could be the following.
                      It was tested with the original dataset posted by the OP, with the dataset in Vivek Kalyanarangan's answer and with the dataset in markus' comment, renamed df2 and df3, respectively.



                      library(dplyr)

                      na2zero <- function(DF){
                      DF %>%
                      group_by(id) %>%
                      mutate(val = ifelse(is.na(val), 0, val),
                      crit = val == 0 & duplicated(val)) %>%
                      filter(!crit) %>%
                      select(-crit)
                      }

                      na2zero(df1)
                      na2zero(df2)
                      na2zero(df3)






                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 46 mins ago

























                      answered 2 hours ago









                      Rui Barradas

                      16.1k41730




                      16.1k41730












                      • Rui, try with df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 2), val = c(NA, 1, 2, 3)). Unfortunately your solution doesn't return a data frame with only three rows.
                        – markus
                        1 hour ago










                      • @markus No, it doesn't. The NA is replaced by a 0 and the other value of val is not NA so both must be in the output. At least that's how I'm understanding the OP's problem.
                        – Rui Barradas
                        1 hour ago










                      • Fair enough. People are reading the question differently.
                        – markus
                        17 mins ago


















                      • Rui, try with df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 2), val = c(NA, 1, 2, 3)). Unfortunately your solution doesn't return a data frame with only three rows.
                        – markus
                        1 hour ago










                      • @markus No, it doesn't. The NA is replaced by a 0 and the other value of val is not NA so both must be in the output. At least that's how I'm understanding the OP's problem.
                        – Rui Barradas
                        1 hour ago










                      • Fair enough. People are reading the question differently.
                        – markus
                        17 mins ago
















                      Rui, try with df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 2), val = c(NA, 1, 2, 3)). Unfortunately your solution doesn't return a data frame with only three rows.
                      – markus
                      1 hour ago




                      Rui, try with df1 <- data.frame(id = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 2), val = c(NA, 1, 2, 3)). Unfortunately your solution doesn't return a data frame with only three rows.
                      – markus
                      1 hour ago












                      @markus No, it doesn't. The NA is replaced by a 0 and the other value of val is not NA so both must be in the output. At least that's how I'm understanding the OP's problem.
                      – Rui Barradas
                      1 hour ago




                      @markus No, it doesn't. The NA is replaced by a 0 and the other value of val is not NA so both must be in the output. At least that's how I'm understanding the OP's problem.
                      – Rui Barradas
                      1 hour ago












                      Fair enough. People are reading the question differently.
                      – markus
                      17 mins ago




                      Fair enough. People are reading the question differently.
                      – markus
                      17 mins ago


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54022536%2freplace-all-na-values-for-variable-with-one-row-equal-to-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Eastern Orthodox Church

                      Zagreb

                      Understanding the information contained in the Deep Space Network XML data?