How is the missing digit calculated?












5














Recently I watched a video by Arthur Benjamin:



https://youtu.be/e4PTvXtz4GM?t=337



I was curious how we solved this part of his show, and would like to know.



Essentially at this point of the video, he asks three audience members to take the number $576$ and multiply it by a $4$ digit number. Thus the resulting product is a $6$ or $7$ digit number.



Then he asks each of the members to call out all 5 of their 6, or 6 of their 7 digits, and he will find the missing digit.



The first person calls:



$8,0,9,3,8$, and Arthur guesses $8$ as the digit he leaves out.



The second person calls:



$4,7,2,5,8,4$, and Arthur guesses $6$.



The third person calls:



$9,4,4,5,4,4$, and Arthur guesses $6$.





My question is, how exactly he knew this.



Firstly, I realize that adding each of the digits together in the product yields $36$, regardless of it being a $6$ or $7$ digit number. So then I assume that he just added all their digits and subtracted from $36$ to get their missing digit.



If this is the case, where did the number $36$ come from?



I don't think this is fully true, as something like $231times 4412 = 1019172$, which has digits sum up to $21$.



I don't have any previous experience is number theory (if I need to know this to understand why it works)










share|cite|improve this question



























    5














    Recently I watched a video by Arthur Benjamin:



    https://youtu.be/e4PTvXtz4GM?t=337



    I was curious how we solved this part of his show, and would like to know.



    Essentially at this point of the video, he asks three audience members to take the number $576$ and multiply it by a $4$ digit number. Thus the resulting product is a $6$ or $7$ digit number.



    Then he asks each of the members to call out all 5 of their 6, or 6 of their 7 digits, and he will find the missing digit.



    The first person calls:



    $8,0,9,3,8$, and Arthur guesses $8$ as the digit he leaves out.



    The second person calls:



    $4,7,2,5,8,4$, and Arthur guesses $6$.



    The third person calls:



    $9,4,4,5,4,4$, and Arthur guesses $6$.





    My question is, how exactly he knew this.



    Firstly, I realize that adding each of the digits together in the product yields $36$, regardless of it being a $6$ or $7$ digit number. So then I assume that he just added all their digits and subtracted from $36$ to get their missing digit.



    If this is the case, where did the number $36$ come from?



    I don't think this is fully true, as something like $231times 4412 = 1019172$, which has digits sum up to $21$.



    I don't have any previous experience is number theory (if I need to know this to understand why it works)










    share|cite|improve this question

























      5












      5








      5


      2





      Recently I watched a video by Arthur Benjamin:



      https://youtu.be/e4PTvXtz4GM?t=337



      I was curious how we solved this part of his show, and would like to know.



      Essentially at this point of the video, he asks three audience members to take the number $576$ and multiply it by a $4$ digit number. Thus the resulting product is a $6$ or $7$ digit number.



      Then he asks each of the members to call out all 5 of their 6, or 6 of their 7 digits, and he will find the missing digit.



      The first person calls:



      $8,0,9,3,8$, and Arthur guesses $8$ as the digit he leaves out.



      The second person calls:



      $4,7,2,5,8,4$, and Arthur guesses $6$.



      The third person calls:



      $9,4,4,5,4,4$, and Arthur guesses $6$.





      My question is, how exactly he knew this.



      Firstly, I realize that adding each of the digits together in the product yields $36$, regardless of it being a $6$ or $7$ digit number. So then I assume that he just added all their digits and subtracted from $36$ to get their missing digit.



      If this is the case, where did the number $36$ come from?



      I don't think this is fully true, as something like $231times 4412 = 1019172$, which has digits sum up to $21$.



      I don't have any previous experience is number theory (if I need to know this to understand why it works)










      share|cite|improve this question













      Recently I watched a video by Arthur Benjamin:



      https://youtu.be/e4PTvXtz4GM?t=337



      I was curious how we solved this part of his show, and would like to know.



      Essentially at this point of the video, he asks three audience members to take the number $576$ and multiply it by a $4$ digit number. Thus the resulting product is a $6$ or $7$ digit number.



      Then he asks each of the members to call out all 5 of their 6, or 6 of their 7 digits, and he will find the missing digit.



      The first person calls:



      $8,0,9,3,8$, and Arthur guesses $8$ as the digit he leaves out.



      The second person calls:



      $4,7,2,5,8,4$, and Arthur guesses $6$.



      The third person calls:



      $9,4,4,5,4,4$, and Arthur guesses $6$.





      My question is, how exactly he knew this.



      Firstly, I realize that adding each of the digits together in the product yields $36$, regardless of it being a $6$ or $7$ digit number. So then I assume that he just added all their digits and subtracted from $36$ to get their missing digit.



      If this is the case, where did the number $36$ come from?



      I don't think this is fully true, as something like $231times 4412 = 1019172$, which has digits sum up to $21$.



      I don't have any previous experience is number theory (if I need to know this to understand why it works)







      number-theory elementary-number-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 5 hours ago









      K Split X

      4,19211031




      4,19211031






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          It is a quite simple method of adding the digits and checking their remainder when divided by $9$. This is because $576$ is $9 times 64$, so the resulting value would also be a multiple of $9$ and the missing digit would generally be $9$ less the remainder. This is because all powers of $10$ leave a remainder of $1$ when divided by $9$ since $10^n = left(9 + 1right)^n = 9^n + n times 9^{n - 1} + ldots + n times 9 + 1$, for $n$ being a non-negative integer, with all of the terms being a multiple of $9$ except the last one. Thus, the remainder when a number is divided by $9$ is the same as when the sum of its digits are divided by $9$.



          As for the sums in the examples being $36$, this is not always necessarily the case as you noticed yourself.



          Regarding the person dropping $0$ or $9$, please see Mark Bennet's answer for how to handle that. I suspect the choice of $576$ and the limitation of the number to multiply it with being $4$ digits likely have to do with ensuring this issue of $0$ or $9$ can be overcome using some other method, likely another divisibility test, but I haven't considered this in any detail.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Good answer, +1. This shows how you don't even need it to be a four digit number that you multiply the $576$ by (although keeping the number of digits small makes it easier), and there is nothing that special about $576$ to start.
            – Dave
            4 hours ago










          • @Dave Yes, that is true. However, I think the relatively small number of digits, plus possibly the value of $576$ itself, were picked so he could uniquely handle the issue of a $0$ or $9$, as Mark Bennet discusses in his answer.
            – John Omielan
            4 hours ago



















          2














          The digit sum of any multiple of $9$ is always a multiple of $9$. If you iterate the process of summing the digits of any positive integer until you get a single digit you get $9$ or the non-zero remainder you would get on division by $9$. Subtract this remainder from $9$ to get the answer.



          There is one ambiguity, which is that this method does not distinguish between dropping a $9$ or dropping a zero. You can get round this by asking the audience to drop a non-zero digit. Or assuming they give the digits in correct order, with just one digit missing, there is a test for divisibility by $64$ which could be invoked.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058140%2fhow-is-the-missing-digit-calculated%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4














            It is a quite simple method of adding the digits and checking their remainder when divided by $9$. This is because $576$ is $9 times 64$, so the resulting value would also be a multiple of $9$ and the missing digit would generally be $9$ less the remainder. This is because all powers of $10$ leave a remainder of $1$ when divided by $9$ since $10^n = left(9 + 1right)^n = 9^n + n times 9^{n - 1} + ldots + n times 9 + 1$, for $n$ being a non-negative integer, with all of the terms being a multiple of $9$ except the last one. Thus, the remainder when a number is divided by $9$ is the same as when the sum of its digits are divided by $9$.



            As for the sums in the examples being $36$, this is not always necessarily the case as you noticed yourself.



            Regarding the person dropping $0$ or $9$, please see Mark Bennet's answer for how to handle that. I suspect the choice of $576$ and the limitation of the number to multiply it with being $4$ digits likely have to do with ensuring this issue of $0$ or $9$ can be overcome using some other method, likely another divisibility test, but I haven't considered this in any detail.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Good answer, +1. This shows how you don't even need it to be a four digit number that you multiply the $576$ by (although keeping the number of digits small makes it easier), and there is nothing that special about $576$ to start.
              – Dave
              4 hours ago










            • @Dave Yes, that is true. However, I think the relatively small number of digits, plus possibly the value of $576$ itself, were picked so he could uniquely handle the issue of a $0$ or $9$, as Mark Bennet discusses in his answer.
              – John Omielan
              4 hours ago
















            4














            It is a quite simple method of adding the digits and checking their remainder when divided by $9$. This is because $576$ is $9 times 64$, so the resulting value would also be a multiple of $9$ and the missing digit would generally be $9$ less the remainder. This is because all powers of $10$ leave a remainder of $1$ when divided by $9$ since $10^n = left(9 + 1right)^n = 9^n + n times 9^{n - 1} + ldots + n times 9 + 1$, for $n$ being a non-negative integer, with all of the terms being a multiple of $9$ except the last one. Thus, the remainder when a number is divided by $9$ is the same as when the sum of its digits are divided by $9$.



            As for the sums in the examples being $36$, this is not always necessarily the case as you noticed yourself.



            Regarding the person dropping $0$ or $9$, please see Mark Bennet's answer for how to handle that. I suspect the choice of $576$ and the limitation of the number to multiply it with being $4$ digits likely have to do with ensuring this issue of $0$ or $9$ can be overcome using some other method, likely another divisibility test, but I haven't considered this in any detail.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Good answer, +1. This shows how you don't even need it to be a four digit number that you multiply the $576$ by (although keeping the number of digits small makes it easier), and there is nothing that special about $576$ to start.
              – Dave
              4 hours ago










            • @Dave Yes, that is true. However, I think the relatively small number of digits, plus possibly the value of $576$ itself, were picked so he could uniquely handle the issue of a $0$ or $9$, as Mark Bennet discusses in his answer.
              – John Omielan
              4 hours ago














            4












            4








            4






            It is a quite simple method of adding the digits and checking their remainder when divided by $9$. This is because $576$ is $9 times 64$, so the resulting value would also be a multiple of $9$ and the missing digit would generally be $9$ less the remainder. This is because all powers of $10$ leave a remainder of $1$ when divided by $9$ since $10^n = left(9 + 1right)^n = 9^n + n times 9^{n - 1} + ldots + n times 9 + 1$, for $n$ being a non-negative integer, with all of the terms being a multiple of $9$ except the last one. Thus, the remainder when a number is divided by $9$ is the same as when the sum of its digits are divided by $9$.



            As for the sums in the examples being $36$, this is not always necessarily the case as you noticed yourself.



            Regarding the person dropping $0$ or $9$, please see Mark Bennet's answer for how to handle that. I suspect the choice of $576$ and the limitation of the number to multiply it with being $4$ digits likely have to do with ensuring this issue of $0$ or $9$ can be overcome using some other method, likely another divisibility test, but I haven't considered this in any detail.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            It is a quite simple method of adding the digits and checking their remainder when divided by $9$. This is because $576$ is $9 times 64$, so the resulting value would also be a multiple of $9$ and the missing digit would generally be $9$ less the remainder. This is because all powers of $10$ leave a remainder of $1$ when divided by $9$ since $10^n = left(9 + 1right)^n = 9^n + n times 9^{n - 1} + ldots + n times 9 + 1$, for $n$ being a non-negative integer, with all of the terms being a multiple of $9$ except the last one. Thus, the remainder when a number is divided by $9$ is the same as when the sum of its digits are divided by $9$.



            As for the sums in the examples being $36$, this is not always necessarily the case as you noticed yourself.



            Regarding the person dropping $0$ or $9$, please see Mark Bennet's answer for how to handle that. I suspect the choice of $576$ and the limitation of the number to multiply it with being $4$ digits likely have to do with ensuring this issue of $0$ or $9$ can be overcome using some other method, likely another divisibility test, but I haven't considered this in any detail.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 5 mins ago

























            answered 5 hours ago









            John Omielan

            87418




            87418












            • Good answer, +1. This shows how you don't even need it to be a four digit number that you multiply the $576$ by (although keeping the number of digits small makes it easier), and there is nothing that special about $576$ to start.
              – Dave
              4 hours ago










            • @Dave Yes, that is true. However, I think the relatively small number of digits, plus possibly the value of $576$ itself, were picked so he could uniquely handle the issue of a $0$ or $9$, as Mark Bennet discusses in his answer.
              – John Omielan
              4 hours ago


















            • Good answer, +1. This shows how you don't even need it to be a four digit number that you multiply the $576$ by (although keeping the number of digits small makes it easier), and there is nothing that special about $576$ to start.
              – Dave
              4 hours ago










            • @Dave Yes, that is true. However, I think the relatively small number of digits, plus possibly the value of $576$ itself, were picked so he could uniquely handle the issue of a $0$ or $9$, as Mark Bennet discusses in his answer.
              – John Omielan
              4 hours ago
















            Good answer, +1. This shows how you don't even need it to be a four digit number that you multiply the $576$ by (although keeping the number of digits small makes it easier), and there is nothing that special about $576$ to start.
            – Dave
            4 hours ago




            Good answer, +1. This shows how you don't even need it to be a four digit number that you multiply the $576$ by (although keeping the number of digits small makes it easier), and there is nothing that special about $576$ to start.
            – Dave
            4 hours ago












            @Dave Yes, that is true. However, I think the relatively small number of digits, plus possibly the value of $576$ itself, were picked so he could uniquely handle the issue of a $0$ or $9$, as Mark Bennet discusses in his answer.
            – John Omielan
            4 hours ago




            @Dave Yes, that is true. However, I think the relatively small number of digits, plus possibly the value of $576$ itself, were picked so he could uniquely handle the issue of a $0$ or $9$, as Mark Bennet discusses in his answer.
            – John Omielan
            4 hours ago











            2














            The digit sum of any multiple of $9$ is always a multiple of $9$. If you iterate the process of summing the digits of any positive integer until you get a single digit you get $9$ or the non-zero remainder you would get on division by $9$. Subtract this remainder from $9$ to get the answer.



            There is one ambiguity, which is that this method does not distinguish between dropping a $9$ or dropping a zero. You can get round this by asking the audience to drop a non-zero digit. Or assuming they give the digits in correct order, with just one digit missing, there is a test for divisibility by $64$ which could be invoked.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              2














              The digit sum of any multiple of $9$ is always a multiple of $9$. If you iterate the process of summing the digits of any positive integer until you get a single digit you get $9$ or the non-zero remainder you would get on division by $9$. Subtract this remainder from $9$ to get the answer.



              There is one ambiguity, which is that this method does not distinguish between dropping a $9$ or dropping a zero. You can get round this by asking the audience to drop a non-zero digit. Or assuming they give the digits in correct order, with just one digit missing, there is a test for divisibility by $64$ which could be invoked.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                2












                2








                2






                The digit sum of any multiple of $9$ is always a multiple of $9$. If you iterate the process of summing the digits of any positive integer until you get a single digit you get $9$ or the non-zero remainder you would get on division by $9$. Subtract this remainder from $9$ to get the answer.



                There is one ambiguity, which is that this method does not distinguish between dropping a $9$ or dropping a zero. You can get round this by asking the audience to drop a non-zero digit. Or assuming they give the digits in correct order, with just one digit missing, there is a test for divisibility by $64$ which could be invoked.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                The digit sum of any multiple of $9$ is always a multiple of $9$. If you iterate the process of summing the digits of any positive integer until you get a single digit you get $9$ or the non-zero remainder you would get on division by $9$. Subtract this remainder from $9$ to get the answer.



                There is one ambiguity, which is that this method does not distinguish between dropping a $9$ or dropping a zero. You can get round this by asking the audience to drop a non-zero digit. Or assuming they give the digits in correct order, with just one digit missing, there is a test for divisibility by $64$ which could be invoked.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 5 hours ago









                Mark Bennet

                80.5k981179




                80.5k981179






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058140%2fhow-is-the-missing-digit-calculated%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Eastern Orthodox Church

                    Zagreb

                    Understanding the information contained in the Deep Space Network XML data?