Meaning of “is at two removes”












1















In the Republic, poetry is condemned and the poets exiled just
because poetry is a successful “imitation.” Imitation is bad for
two reasons. For one thing, it is secondary, derived, not the
real thing. In that sense it is factitious, however accurate it may
be as a copy. A bed, for example, Plato argued, is already an
imitation of the “idea” of a bed, the ideal paradigm from
which each real bed is copied. A painting of a bed or a
description of it in poetry, such as Homer’s description in the
Odyssey of Odysseus’s nuptial bed, with its bedpost made of a
still-rooted olive tree’s trunk, is at two removes. It is a copy of
a copy, so who needs it?




is here "remove" as a noun.and mean: the distance between bedposts? but I don't understand "at two" here.



This passage is from a book named: On literature



This context is about Plato's opinion about poetry.



Correct me if I am wrong.










share|improve this question




















  • 3




    Think of it as "two degrees of separation."
    – Jason Bassford
    8 hours ago
















1















In the Republic, poetry is condemned and the poets exiled just
because poetry is a successful “imitation.” Imitation is bad for
two reasons. For one thing, it is secondary, derived, not the
real thing. In that sense it is factitious, however accurate it may
be as a copy. A bed, for example, Plato argued, is already an
imitation of the “idea” of a bed, the ideal paradigm from
which each real bed is copied. A painting of a bed or a
description of it in poetry, such as Homer’s description in the
Odyssey of Odysseus’s nuptial bed, with its bedpost made of a
still-rooted olive tree’s trunk, is at two removes. It is a copy of
a copy, so who needs it?




is here "remove" as a noun.and mean: the distance between bedposts? but I don't understand "at two" here.



This passage is from a book named: On literature



This context is about Plato's opinion about poetry.



Correct me if I am wrong.










share|improve this question




















  • 3




    Think of it as "two degrees of separation."
    – Jason Bassford
    8 hours ago














1












1








1








In the Republic, poetry is condemned and the poets exiled just
because poetry is a successful “imitation.” Imitation is bad for
two reasons. For one thing, it is secondary, derived, not the
real thing. In that sense it is factitious, however accurate it may
be as a copy. A bed, for example, Plato argued, is already an
imitation of the “idea” of a bed, the ideal paradigm from
which each real bed is copied. A painting of a bed or a
description of it in poetry, such as Homer’s description in the
Odyssey of Odysseus’s nuptial bed, with its bedpost made of a
still-rooted olive tree’s trunk, is at two removes. It is a copy of
a copy, so who needs it?




is here "remove" as a noun.and mean: the distance between bedposts? but I don't understand "at two" here.



This passage is from a book named: On literature



This context is about Plato's opinion about poetry.



Correct me if I am wrong.










share|improve this question
















In the Republic, poetry is condemned and the poets exiled just
because poetry is a successful “imitation.” Imitation is bad for
two reasons. For one thing, it is secondary, derived, not the
real thing. In that sense it is factitious, however accurate it may
be as a copy. A bed, for example, Plato argued, is already an
imitation of the “idea” of a bed, the ideal paradigm from
which each real bed is copied. A painting of a bed or a
description of it in poetry, such as Homer’s description in the
Odyssey of Odysseus’s nuptial bed, with its bedpost made of a
still-rooted olive tree’s trunk, is at two removes. It is a copy of
a copy, so who needs it?




is here "remove" as a noun.and mean: the distance between bedposts? but I don't understand "at two" here.



This passage is from a book named: On literature



This context is about Plato's opinion about poetry.



Correct me if I am wrong.







phrase-meaning sentence-meaning






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago

























asked 8 hours ago









Viser Hashemi

1938




1938








  • 3




    Think of it as "two degrees of separation."
    – Jason Bassford
    8 hours ago














  • 3




    Think of it as "two degrees of separation."
    – Jason Bassford
    8 hours ago








3




3




Think of it as "two degrees of separation."
– Jason Bassford
8 hours ago




Think of it as "two degrees of separation."
– Jason Bassford
8 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














Yes, "remove" is a noun here, but it is obsolete except in a few special senses, and in this idiom: "at two removes" means "taking two (logical, or notional) steps away from something" - in this case, from the Platonic ideal, to the bed, to the image of a bed.






share|improve this answer





















  • Many thanks. Do you mean: the bedposts of bed are in two step away from eachother or the bedpost is in two step away from something else which we don't know what it is? and Do you know the meaning of "still-rooted"
    – Viser Hashemi
    8 hours ago






  • 4




    It has nothing whatever to do with the bedposts, @ViserHashemi: it's talking about the conceptual separation from the ideal to the bed, and from the bed to an image of a bed.
    – Colin Fine
    7 hours ago










  • The only (barely) common use of "remove" this way is in genealogy. Cousins are said to be so many times "removed" from each other. Each "remov[al]" means their common ancestor is from one more generation previous.
    – K.A
    2 hours ago










  • @K.A: yes, but what is used in that case is the participle/adjective "removed", not the noun "remove".
    – Colin Fine
    1 hour ago










  • @ColinFine: I can't edit my comment, but I should have written that it is the same idea of "remov[...]" meaning metaphoric and not literal quantified separation distance.
    – K.A
    21 mins ago



















2














Further to Colin's good answer, consider how the police sketch artists use descriptions provided by witnesses to create the likeness of a suspect, so that they can send out an All Points Bulletin.



Such sketches are at least at one remove from the suspect. They are not a photograph but a drawing based on someone's description.



Now, if for some reason police headquarters does not have the ability to transmit the sketch to a patrol car but must describe the sketch to a police officer over the radio, that verbal description will be at two removes from the suspect:




"A heavy-set bald Caucasian male in his mid forties with a Fu-Manchu mustache, a large amethyst earring in his left ear, and one gold front tooth."




The "remove" or "step" is not an actual physical distance but a logical or conceptual "distance" away from the original. As Colin says, "notional".






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "481"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f191419%2fmeaning-of-is-at-two-removes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    Yes, "remove" is a noun here, but it is obsolete except in a few special senses, and in this idiom: "at two removes" means "taking two (logical, or notional) steps away from something" - in this case, from the Platonic ideal, to the bed, to the image of a bed.






    share|improve this answer





















    • Many thanks. Do you mean: the bedposts of bed are in two step away from eachother or the bedpost is in two step away from something else which we don't know what it is? and Do you know the meaning of "still-rooted"
      – Viser Hashemi
      8 hours ago






    • 4




      It has nothing whatever to do with the bedposts, @ViserHashemi: it's talking about the conceptual separation from the ideal to the bed, and from the bed to an image of a bed.
      – Colin Fine
      7 hours ago










    • The only (barely) common use of "remove" this way is in genealogy. Cousins are said to be so many times "removed" from each other. Each "remov[al]" means their common ancestor is from one more generation previous.
      – K.A
      2 hours ago










    • @K.A: yes, but what is used in that case is the participle/adjective "removed", not the noun "remove".
      – Colin Fine
      1 hour ago










    • @ColinFine: I can't edit my comment, but I should have written that it is the same idea of "remov[...]" meaning metaphoric and not literal quantified separation distance.
      – K.A
      21 mins ago
















    5














    Yes, "remove" is a noun here, but it is obsolete except in a few special senses, and in this idiom: "at two removes" means "taking two (logical, or notional) steps away from something" - in this case, from the Platonic ideal, to the bed, to the image of a bed.






    share|improve this answer





















    • Many thanks. Do you mean: the bedposts of bed are in two step away from eachother or the bedpost is in two step away from something else which we don't know what it is? and Do you know the meaning of "still-rooted"
      – Viser Hashemi
      8 hours ago






    • 4




      It has nothing whatever to do with the bedposts, @ViserHashemi: it's talking about the conceptual separation from the ideal to the bed, and from the bed to an image of a bed.
      – Colin Fine
      7 hours ago










    • The only (barely) common use of "remove" this way is in genealogy. Cousins are said to be so many times "removed" from each other. Each "remov[al]" means their common ancestor is from one more generation previous.
      – K.A
      2 hours ago










    • @K.A: yes, but what is used in that case is the participle/adjective "removed", not the noun "remove".
      – Colin Fine
      1 hour ago










    • @ColinFine: I can't edit my comment, but I should have written that it is the same idea of "remov[...]" meaning metaphoric and not literal quantified separation distance.
      – K.A
      21 mins ago














    5












    5








    5






    Yes, "remove" is a noun here, but it is obsolete except in a few special senses, and in this idiom: "at two removes" means "taking two (logical, or notional) steps away from something" - in this case, from the Platonic ideal, to the bed, to the image of a bed.






    share|improve this answer












    Yes, "remove" is a noun here, but it is obsolete except in a few special senses, and in this idiom: "at two removes" means "taking two (logical, or notional) steps away from something" - in this case, from the Platonic ideal, to the bed, to the image of a bed.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 8 hours ago









    Colin Fine

    28.2k24055




    28.2k24055












    • Many thanks. Do you mean: the bedposts of bed are in two step away from eachother or the bedpost is in two step away from something else which we don't know what it is? and Do you know the meaning of "still-rooted"
      – Viser Hashemi
      8 hours ago






    • 4




      It has nothing whatever to do with the bedposts, @ViserHashemi: it's talking about the conceptual separation from the ideal to the bed, and from the bed to an image of a bed.
      – Colin Fine
      7 hours ago










    • The only (barely) common use of "remove" this way is in genealogy. Cousins are said to be so many times "removed" from each other. Each "remov[al]" means their common ancestor is from one more generation previous.
      – K.A
      2 hours ago










    • @K.A: yes, but what is used in that case is the participle/adjective "removed", not the noun "remove".
      – Colin Fine
      1 hour ago










    • @ColinFine: I can't edit my comment, but I should have written that it is the same idea of "remov[...]" meaning metaphoric and not literal quantified separation distance.
      – K.A
      21 mins ago


















    • Many thanks. Do you mean: the bedposts of bed are in two step away from eachother or the bedpost is in two step away from something else which we don't know what it is? and Do you know the meaning of "still-rooted"
      – Viser Hashemi
      8 hours ago






    • 4




      It has nothing whatever to do with the bedposts, @ViserHashemi: it's talking about the conceptual separation from the ideal to the bed, and from the bed to an image of a bed.
      – Colin Fine
      7 hours ago










    • The only (barely) common use of "remove" this way is in genealogy. Cousins are said to be so many times "removed" from each other. Each "remov[al]" means their common ancestor is from one more generation previous.
      – K.A
      2 hours ago










    • @K.A: yes, but what is used in that case is the participle/adjective "removed", not the noun "remove".
      – Colin Fine
      1 hour ago










    • @ColinFine: I can't edit my comment, but I should have written that it is the same idea of "remov[...]" meaning metaphoric and not literal quantified separation distance.
      – K.A
      21 mins ago
















    Many thanks. Do you mean: the bedposts of bed are in two step away from eachother or the bedpost is in two step away from something else which we don't know what it is? and Do you know the meaning of "still-rooted"
    – Viser Hashemi
    8 hours ago




    Many thanks. Do you mean: the bedposts of bed are in two step away from eachother or the bedpost is in two step away from something else which we don't know what it is? and Do you know the meaning of "still-rooted"
    – Viser Hashemi
    8 hours ago




    4




    4




    It has nothing whatever to do with the bedposts, @ViserHashemi: it's talking about the conceptual separation from the ideal to the bed, and from the bed to an image of a bed.
    – Colin Fine
    7 hours ago




    It has nothing whatever to do with the bedposts, @ViserHashemi: it's talking about the conceptual separation from the ideal to the bed, and from the bed to an image of a bed.
    – Colin Fine
    7 hours ago












    The only (barely) common use of "remove" this way is in genealogy. Cousins are said to be so many times "removed" from each other. Each "remov[al]" means their common ancestor is from one more generation previous.
    – K.A
    2 hours ago




    The only (barely) common use of "remove" this way is in genealogy. Cousins are said to be so many times "removed" from each other. Each "remov[al]" means their common ancestor is from one more generation previous.
    – K.A
    2 hours ago












    @K.A: yes, but what is used in that case is the participle/adjective "removed", not the noun "remove".
    – Colin Fine
    1 hour ago




    @K.A: yes, but what is used in that case is the participle/adjective "removed", not the noun "remove".
    – Colin Fine
    1 hour ago












    @ColinFine: I can't edit my comment, but I should have written that it is the same idea of "remov[...]" meaning metaphoric and not literal quantified separation distance.
    – K.A
    21 mins ago




    @ColinFine: I can't edit my comment, but I should have written that it is the same idea of "remov[...]" meaning metaphoric and not literal quantified separation distance.
    – K.A
    21 mins ago













    2














    Further to Colin's good answer, consider how the police sketch artists use descriptions provided by witnesses to create the likeness of a suspect, so that they can send out an All Points Bulletin.



    Such sketches are at least at one remove from the suspect. They are not a photograph but a drawing based on someone's description.



    Now, if for some reason police headquarters does not have the ability to transmit the sketch to a patrol car but must describe the sketch to a police officer over the radio, that verbal description will be at two removes from the suspect:




    "A heavy-set bald Caucasian male in his mid forties with a Fu-Manchu mustache, a large amethyst earring in his left ear, and one gold front tooth."




    The "remove" or "step" is not an actual physical distance but a logical or conceptual "distance" away from the original. As Colin says, "notional".






    share|improve this answer




























      2














      Further to Colin's good answer, consider how the police sketch artists use descriptions provided by witnesses to create the likeness of a suspect, so that they can send out an All Points Bulletin.



      Such sketches are at least at one remove from the suspect. They are not a photograph but a drawing based on someone's description.



      Now, if for some reason police headquarters does not have the ability to transmit the sketch to a patrol car but must describe the sketch to a police officer over the radio, that verbal description will be at two removes from the suspect:




      "A heavy-set bald Caucasian male in his mid forties with a Fu-Manchu mustache, a large amethyst earring in his left ear, and one gold front tooth."




      The "remove" or "step" is not an actual physical distance but a logical or conceptual "distance" away from the original. As Colin says, "notional".






      share|improve this answer


























        2












        2








        2






        Further to Colin's good answer, consider how the police sketch artists use descriptions provided by witnesses to create the likeness of a suspect, so that they can send out an All Points Bulletin.



        Such sketches are at least at one remove from the suspect. They are not a photograph but a drawing based on someone's description.



        Now, if for some reason police headquarters does not have the ability to transmit the sketch to a patrol car but must describe the sketch to a police officer over the radio, that verbal description will be at two removes from the suspect:




        "A heavy-set bald Caucasian male in his mid forties with a Fu-Manchu mustache, a large amethyst earring in his left ear, and one gold front tooth."




        The "remove" or "step" is not an actual physical distance but a logical or conceptual "distance" away from the original. As Colin says, "notional".






        share|improve this answer














        Further to Colin's good answer, consider how the police sketch artists use descriptions provided by witnesses to create the likeness of a suspect, so that they can send out an All Points Bulletin.



        Such sketches are at least at one remove from the suspect. They are not a photograph but a drawing based on someone's description.



        Now, if for some reason police headquarters does not have the ability to transmit the sketch to a patrol car but must describe the sketch to a police officer over the radio, that verbal description will be at two removes from the suspect:




        "A heavy-set bald Caucasian male in his mid forties with a Fu-Manchu mustache, a large amethyst earring in his left ear, and one gold front tooth."




        The "remove" or "step" is not an actual physical distance but a logical or conceptual "distance" away from the original. As Colin says, "notional".







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 7 hours ago

























        answered 7 hours ago









        Tᴚoɯɐuo

        108k682174




        108k682174






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f191419%2fmeaning-of-is-at-two-removes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Understanding the information contained in the Deep Space Network XML data?

            Ross-on-Wye

            Eastern Orthodox Church