Why does the `updatedb` program run so fast?
Usually when I have programs that are doing a full disk scan and going over all files in the system they take a very long time to run. Why does updatedb run so fast in comparison?
updatedb
add a comment |
Usually when I have programs that are doing a full disk scan and going over all files in the system they take a very long time to run. Why does updatedb run so fast in comparison?
updatedb
add a comment |
Usually when I have programs that are doing a full disk scan and going over all files in the system they take a very long time to run. Why does updatedb run so fast in comparison?
updatedb
Usually when I have programs that are doing a full disk scan and going over all files in the system they take a very long time to run. Why does updatedb run so fast in comparison?
updatedb
updatedb
asked 1 hour ago
hugomg
1,66731632
1,66731632
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The answer depends on the version of locate
you’re using, but there’s a fair chance it’s mlocate
, whose updatedb
runs quickly by avoiding doing full disk scans:
mlocate is a locate/updatedb implementation. The 'm' stands for "merging":
updatedb reuses the existing database to avoid rereading most of the file
system, which makes updatedb faster and does not trash the system caches as
much.
(The database stores each directory’s timestamp, ctime
or mtime
, whichever is newer.)
Fairly good question and answer, did not even know there were "differencial" scannings.
– Rui F Ribeiro
1 hour ago
Thanks! I had never noticed that modifying a file also changes the ctime and mtime of all its parent directories.
– hugomg
7 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492044%2fwhy-does-the-updatedb-program-run-so-fast%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The answer depends on the version of locate
you’re using, but there’s a fair chance it’s mlocate
, whose updatedb
runs quickly by avoiding doing full disk scans:
mlocate is a locate/updatedb implementation. The 'm' stands for "merging":
updatedb reuses the existing database to avoid rereading most of the file
system, which makes updatedb faster and does not trash the system caches as
much.
(The database stores each directory’s timestamp, ctime
or mtime
, whichever is newer.)
Fairly good question and answer, did not even know there were "differencial" scannings.
– Rui F Ribeiro
1 hour ago
Thanks! I had never noticed that modifying a file also changes the ctime and mtime of all its parent directories.
– hugomg
7 mins ago
add a comment |
The answer depends on the version of locate
you’re using, but there’s a fair chance it’s mlocate
, whose updatedb
runs quickly by avoiding doing full disk scans:
mlocate is a locate/updatedb implementation. The 'm' stands for "merging":
updatedb reuses the existing database to avoid rereading most of the file
system, which makes updatedb faster and does not trash the system caches as
much.
(The database stores each directory’s timestamp, ctime
or mtime
, whichever is newer.)
Fairly good question and answer, did not even know there were "differencial" scannings.
– Rui F Ribeiro
1 hour ago
Thanks! I had never noticed that modifying a file also changes the ctime and mtime of all its parent directories.
– hugomg
7 mins ago
add a comment |
The answer depends on the version of locate
you’re using, but there’s a fair chance it’s mlocate
, whose updatedb
runs quickly by avoiding doing full disk scans:
mlocate is a locate/updatedb implementation. The 'm' stands for "merging":
updatedb reuses the existing database to avoid rereading most of the file
system, which makes updatedb faster and does not trash the system caches as
much.
(The database stores each directory’s timestamp, ctime
or mtime
, whichever is newer.)
The answer depends on the version of locate
you’re using, but there’s a fair chance it’s mlocate
, whose updatedb
runs quickly by avoiding doing full disk scans:
mlocate is a locate/updatedb implementation. The 'm' stands for "merging":
updatedb reuses the existing database to avoid rereading most of the file
system, which makes updatedb faster and does not trash the system caches as
much.
(The database stores each directory’s timestamp, ctime
or mtime
, whichever is newer.)
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
Stephen Kitt
164k24365444
164k24365444
Fairly good question and answer, did not even know there were "differencial" scannings.
– Rui F Ribeiro
1 hour ago
Thanks! I had never noticed that modifying a file also changes the ctime and mtime of all its parent directories.
– hugomg
7 mins ago
add a comment |
Fairly good question and answer, did not even know there were "differencial" scannings.
– Rui F Ribeiro
1 hour ago
Thanks! I had never noticed that modifying a file also changes the ctime and mtime of all its parent directories.
– hugomg
7 mins ago
Fairly good question and answer, did not even know there were "differencial" scannings.
– Rui F Ribeiro
1 hour ago
Fairly good question and answer, did not even know there were "differencial" scannings.
– Rui F Ribeiro
1 hour ago
Thanks! I had never noticed that modifying a file also changes the ctime and mtime of all its parent directories.
– hugomg
7 mins ago
Thanks! I had never noticed that modifying a file also changes the ctime and mtime of all its parent directories.
– hugomg
7 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492044%2fwhy-does-the-updatedb-program-run-so-fast%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown