Which SFF work first had the idea of the antagonist restarting life by deliberately wiping it out?












2














I was wondering about this after I realised that Dr. Isaacs in Resident Evil wants to wipe out humanity again and then restart it with a chosen few so life stands a better chance.




Dr. Isaacs: I propose that we end the world... But on our terms. An orchestrated apocalypse. One that would cleanse the world of its' population but leave its infrastracture and resources intact. It's been done once before. With great success. The chosen few will ride out the storm, not in an ark as in the book of Genesis, but in safety. Underground. And when it's over, We will emerge onto a cleansed Earth. One we can then reboot. In our image.



Resident Evil: The Final Chapter




And that Thanos from Marvel has a similar idea but on a universal scale. I know that his motivations aren't the same in the original The Infinity Gauntlet comics but in the MCU and specifically Avengers: Infinity War he wants to do it so life can succeed.




Thanos: Little one, it's a simple calculus. This universe is finite, its resources finite. If life is left unchecked, life will cease to exist. It needs correction.



Avengers: Infinity War




But, what was the first work which brought about the idea of deliberately wiping out half of humanity, a species, life, a planet, a universe in order for it to survive?










share|improve this question




















  • 6




    God in the Bible, maybe? He wiped out 99% of all life on earth with the Noah episode...
    – Lyzvaleska
    2 hours ago












  • @Lyzvaleska Good point! Though religious texts are not considered SFF-nal.
    – TheLethalCarrot
    2 hours ago










  • Piers Anthony's 1974 novel Triple Detente (the answer to this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/193259/…) revolves around this idea, but it is unlikely to be the first
    – Klaus Æ. Mogensen
    2 hours ago








  • 1




    @Lyzvaleska That's referenced in the first quote in the post.
    – Alex
    1 hour ago










  • It wasn't deliberate, but in Adam and No Eve (1941) a scientist wipes out all life on Earth and restarts evolution himself.
    – drewbenn
    8 mins ago
















2














I was wondering about this after I realised that Dr. Isaacs in Resident Evil wants to wipe out humanity again and then restart it with a chosen few so life stands a better chance.




Dr. Isaacs: I propose that we end the world... But on our terms. An orchestrated apocalypse. One that would cleanse the world of its' population but leave its infrastracture and resources intact. It's been done once before. With great success. The chosen few will ride out the storm, not in an ark as in the book of Genesis, but in safety. Underground. And when it's over, We will emerge onto a cleansed Earth. One we can then reboot. In our image.



Resident Evil: The Final Chapter




And that Thanos from Marvel has a similar idea but on a universal scale. I know that his motivations aren't the same in the original The Infinity Gauntlet comics but in the MCU and specifically Avengers: Infinity War he wants to do it so life can succeed.




Thanos: Little one, it's a simple calculus. This universe is finite, its resources finite. If life is left unchecked, life will cease to exist. It needs correction.



Avengers: Infinity War




But, what was the first work which brought about the idea of deliberately wiping out half of humanity, a species, life, a planet, a universe in order for it to survive?










share|improve this question




















  • 6




    God in the Bible, maybe? He wiped out 99% of all life on earth with the Noah episode...
    – Lyzvaleska
    2 hours ago












  • @Lyzvaleska Good point! Though religious texts are not considered SFF-nal.
    – TheLethalCarrot
    2 hours ago










  • Piers Anthony's 1974 novel Triple Detente (the answer to this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/193259/…) revolves around this idea, but it is unlikely to be the first
    – Klaus Æ. Mogensen
    2 hours ago








  • 1




    @Lyzvaleska That's referenced in the first quote in the post.
    – Alex
    1 hour ago










  • It wasn't deliberate, but in Adam and No Eve (1941) a scientist wipes out all life on Earth and restarts evolution himself.
    – drewbenn
    8 mins ago














2












2








2







I was wondering about this after I realised that Dr. Isaacs in Resident Evil wants to wipe out humanity again and then restart it with a chosen few so life stands a better chance.




Dr. Isaacs: I propose that we end the world... But on our terms. An orchestrated apocalypse. One that would cleanse the world of its' population but leave its infrastracture and resources intact. It's been done once before. With great success. The chosen few will ride out the storm, not in an ark as in the book of Genesis, but in safety. Underground. And when it's over, We will emerge onto a cleansed Earth. One we can then reboot. In our image.



Resident Evil: The Final Chapter




And that Thanos from Marvel has a similar idea but on a universal scale. I know that his motivations aren't the same in the original The Infinity Gauntlet comics but in the MCU and specifically Avengers: Infinity War he wants to do it so life can succeed.




Thanos: Little one, it's a simple calculus. This universe is finite, its resources finite. If life is left unchecked, life will cease to exist. It needs correction.



Avengers: Infinity War




But, what was the first work which brought about the idea of deliberately wiping out half of humanity, a species, life, a planet, a universe in order for it to survive?










share|improve this question















I was wondering about this after I realised that Dr. Isaacs in Resident Evil wants to wipe out humanity again and then restart it with a chosen few so life stands a better chance.




Dr. Isaacs: I propose that we end the world... But on our terms. An orchestrated apocalypse. One that would cleanse the world of its' population but leave its infrastracture and resources intact. It's been done once before. With great success. The chosen few will ride out the storm, not in an ark as in the book of Genesis, but in safety. Underground. And when it's over, We will emerge onto a cleansed Earth. One we can then reboot. In our image.



Resident Evil: The Final Chapter




And that Thanos from Marvel has a similar idea but on a universal scale. I know that his motivations aren't the same in the original The Infinity Gauntlet comics but in the MCU and specifically Avengers: Infinity War he wants to do it so life can succeed.




Thanos: Little one, it's a simple calculus. This universe is finite, its resources finite. If life is left unchecked, life will cease to exist. It needs correction.



Avengers: Infinity War




But, what was the first work which brought about the idea of deliberately wiping out half of humanity, a species, life, a planet, a universe in order for it to survive?







history-of






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago

























asked 2 hours ago









TheLethalCarrot

38.2k15208252




38.2k15208252








  • 6




    God in the Bible, maybe? He wiped out 99% of all life on earth with the Noah episode...
    – Lyzvaleska
    2 hours ago












  • @Lyzvaleska Good point! Though religious texts are not considered SFF-nal.
    – TheLethalCarrot
    2 hours ago










  • Piers Anthony's 1974 novel Triple Detente (the answer to this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/193259/…) revolves around this idea, but it is unlikely to be the first
    – Klaus Æ. Mogensen
    2 hours ago








  • 1




    @Lyzvaleska That's referenced in the first quote in the post.
    – Alex
    1 hour ago










  • It wasn't deliberate, but in Adam and No Eve (1941) a scientist wipes out all life on Earth and restarts evolution himself.
    – drewbenn
    8 mins ago














  • 6




    God in the Bible, maybe? He wiped out 99% of all life on earth with the Noah episode...
    – Lyzvaleska
    2 hours ago












  • @Lyzvaleska Good point! Though religious texts are not considered SFF-nal.
    – TheLethalCarrot
    2 hours ago










  • Piers Anthony's 1974 novel Triple Detente (the answer to this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/193259/…) revolves around this idea, but it is unlikely to be the first
    – Klaus Æ. Mogensen
    2 hours ago








  • 1




    @Lyzvaleska That's referenced in the first quote in the post.
    – Alex
    1 hour ago










  • It wasn't deliberate, but in Adam and No Eve (1941) a scientist wipes out all life on Earth and restarts evolution himself.
    – drewbenn
    8 mins ago








6




6




God in the Bible, maybe? He wiped out 99% of all life on earth with the Noah episode...
– Lyzvaleska
2 hours ago






God in the Bible, maybe? He wiped out 99% of all life on earth with the Noah episode...
– Lyzvaleska
2 hours ago














@Lyzvaleska Good point! Though religious texts are not considered SFF-nal.
– TheLethalCarrot
2 hours ago




@Lyzvaleska Good point! Though religious texts are not considered SFF-nal.
– TheLethalCarrot
2 hours ago












Piers Anthony's 1974 novel Triple Detente (the answer to this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/193259/…) revolves around this idea, but it is unlikely to be the first
– Klaus Æ. Mogensen
2 hours ago






Piers Anthony's 1974 novel Triple Detente (the answer to this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/193259/…) revolves around this idea, but it is unlikely to be the first
– Klaus Æ. Mogensen
2 hours ago






1




1




@Lyzvaleska That's referenced in the first quote in the post.
– Alex
1 hour ago




@Lyzvaleska That's referenced in the first quote in the post.
– Alex
1 hour ago












It wasn't deliberate, but in Adam and No Eve (1941) a scientist wipes out all life on Earth and restarts evolution himself.
– drewbenn
8 mins ago




It wasn't deliberate, but in Adam and No Eve (1941) a scientist wipes out all life on Earth and restarts evolution himself.
– drewbenn
8 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














1950: "The New Reality", a novelette by Charles L. Harness, first published in Thrilling Wonder Stories, December 1950, available at the Internet Archive.



Professor Luce, a mad ontologist, constructs a device with which he intents to reset reality, expecting that only a select few (himself included of course) will survive.




Prentiss drew deeply on his pipe.

"I saw it."

"Did you understand it?"

"No. It wasn't all there. At least, the apparatus on the table was incomplete. There's more to it than a Nicol prism and a goniometer."

"Ah, you are clever! Yes, I was wise in not permitting you to remain very long — no longer than necessary to whet your curiosity. Look, then! I offer you a partnership. Check my data and apparatus; in return you may be present when I run the experiment. We will attain enlightenment together. We will know all things. We will be gods!"

"And what about two billion other human beings?" said Prentiss, pressing softly at his shoulder holster.

The professor smiled faintly. "Their lunacy — assuming they continue to exist at all — may become slightly more pronounced, of course. But why worry about them?" The wolf-lip curled further. "Don’t expect me to believe this aura of altruism, Mr. Prentiss-Rogers. I think you're afraid to face what lies behind our so-called 'reality.'"

[. . . .]

He knew in a brief flash of insight, that for sentient, thinking beings, Time
had suddenly become a barricade rather than an endless road.

The exploding bomb — the caving cottage walls — were hanging, somewhere, frozen fast in an immutable, eternal stasis.

Luce had separated this fleeting unseen dimension from the creatures and things that had flowed along it. There is no existence without change along a temporal continuum. And now the continuum had been shattered.

Was this, then the fate of all tangible things — of all humanity?

Were none of them — not even the two or three who understod advanced ontology, to — get through?

[. . . .]

She'd got through!

The whole world, and just the two of them!

His heart was pounding ecstatically as he began to run lithely upwind.

And they’d keep it this way, simple and sweet, forever, and their children
after them. To hell with science and progress! (Well, within practical limits, of course.)

As he ran, there rippled about his quivering nostrils the seductive scent of
apple blossoms.







share|improve this answer





























    1














    Probably not the first, but:

    1964. In Stanley Kubrick's movie Dr. Strangelove, towards the end, with impending nuclear war in sight, the titular character suggests gathering a few hundred thousand selected people (including, of course, top politicians and military personnel) underground to wait for the surface to become habitable again, repopulating the planet. He suggests a 10:1 female/male ratio for faster breeding - which isn't rational in my opinion, since it would probably take several generations before the surface becomes habitable again and you don't want the underground habitat to become overpopulated. But of course, the outlook of having access to plenty of women helps persuade the decision-makers to adopt the plan.






    share|improve this answer





















    • In Dr Strangelove the wipeout was unintentional.
      – DJClayworth
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      Worth noting that this answer was posted before I edited to clarify I was asking about cases where the destruction was intentional.
      – TheLethalCarrot
      1 hour ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "186"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202686%2fwhich-sff-work-first-had-the-idea-of-the-antagonist-restarting-life-by-deliberat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    1950: "The New Reality", a novelette by Charles L. Harness, first published in Thrilling Wonder Stories, December 1950, available at the Internet Archive.



    Professor Luce, a mad ontologist, constructs a device with which he intents to reset reality, expecting that only a select few (himself included of course) will survive.




    Prentiss drew deeply on his pipe.

    "I saw it."

    "Did you understand it?"

    "No. It wasn't all there. At least, the apparatus on the table was incomplete. There's more to it than a Nicol prism and a goniometer."

    "Ah, you are clever! Yes, I was wise in not permitting you to remain very long — no longer than necessary to whet your curiosity. Look, then! I offer you a partnership. Check my data and apparatus; in return you may be present when I run the experiment. We will attain enlightenment together. We will know all things. We will be gods!"

    "And what about two billion other human beings?" said Prentiss, pressing softly at his shoulder holster.

    The professor smiled faintly. "Their lunacy — assuming they continue to exist at all — may become slightly more pronounced, of course. But why worry about them?" The wolf-lip curled further. "Don’t expect me to believe this aura of altruism, Mr. Prentiss-Rogers. I think you're afraid to face what lies behind our so-called 'reality.'"

    [. . . .]

    He knew in a brief flash of insight, that for sentient, thinking beings, Time
    had suddenly become a barricade rather than an endless road.

    The exploding bomb — the caving cottage walls — were hanging, somewhere, frozen fast in an immutable, eternal stasis.

    Luce had separated this fleeting unseen dimension from the creatures and things that had flowed along it. There is no existence without change along a temporal continuum. And now the continuum had been shattered.

    Was this, then the fate of all tangible things — of all humanity?

    Were none of them — not even the two or three who understod advanced ontology, to — get through?

    [. . . .]

    She'd got through!

    The whole world, and just the two of them!

    His heart was pounding ecstatically as he began to run lithely upwind.

    And they’d keep it this way, simple and sweet, forever, and their children
    after them. To hell with science and progress! (Well, within practical limits, of course.)

    As he ran, there rippled about his quivering nostrils the seductive scent of
    apple blossoms.







    share|improve this answer


























      5














      1950: "The New Reality", a novelette by Charles L. Harness, first published in Thrilling Wonder Stories, December 1950, available at the Internet Archive.



      Professor Luce, a mad ontologist, constructs a device with which he intents to reset reality, expecting that only a select few (himself included of course) will survive.




      Prentiss drew deeply on his pipe.

      "I saw it."

      "Did you understand it?"

      "No. It wasn't all there. At least, the apparatus on the table was incomplete. There's more to it than a Nicol prism and a goniometer."

      "Ah, you are clever! Yes, I was wise in not permitting you to remain very long — no longer than necessary to whet your curiosity. Look, then! I offer you a partnership. Check my data and apparatus; in return you may be present when I run the experiment. We will attain enlightenment together. We will know all things. We will be gods!"

      "And what about two billion other human beings?" said Prentiss, pressing softly at his shoulder holster.

      The professor smiled faintly. "Their lunacy — assuming they continue to exist at all — may become slightly more pronounced, of course. But why worry about them?" The wolf-lip curled further. "Don’t expect me to believe this aura of altruism, Mr. Prentiss-Rogers. I think you're afraid to face what lies behind our so-called 'reality.'"

      [. . . .]

      He knew in a brief flash of insight, that for sentient, thinking beings, Time
      had suddenly become a barricade rather than an endless road.

      The exploding bomb — the caving cottage walls — were hanging, somewhere, frozen fast in an immutable, eternal stasis.

      Luce had separated this fleeting unseen dimension from the creatures and things that had flowed along it. There is no existence without change along a temporal continuum. And now the continuum had been shattered.

      Was this, then the fate of all tangible things — of all humanity?

      Were none of them — not even the two or three who understod advanced ontology, to — get through?

      [. . . .]

      She'd got through!

      The whole world, and just the two of them!

      His heart was pounding ecstatically as he began to run lithely upwind.

      And they’d keep it this way, simple and sweet, forever, and their children
      after them. To hell with science and progress! (Well, within practical limits, of course.)

      As he ran, there rippled about his quivering nostrils the seductive scent of
      apple blossoms.







      share|improve this answer
























        5












        5








        5






        1950: "The New Reality", a novelette by Charles L. Harness, first published in Thrilling Wonder Stories, December 1950, available at the Internet Archive.



        Professor Luce, a mad ontologist, constructs a device with which he intents to reset reality, expecting that only a select few (himself included of course) will survive.




        Prentiss drew deeply on his pipe.

        "I saw it."

        "Did you understand it?"

        "No. It wasn't all there. At least, the apparatus on the table was incomplete. There's more to it than a Nicol prism and a goniometer."

        "Ah, you are clever! Yes, I was wise in not permitting you to remain very long — no longer than necessary to whet your curiosity. Look, then! I offer you a partnership. Check my data and apparatus; in return you may be present when I run the experiment. We will attain enlightenment together. We will know all things. We will be gods!"

        "And what about two billion other human beings?" said Prentiss, pressing softly at his shoulder holster.

        The professor smiled faintly. "Their lunacy — assuming they continue to exist at all — may become slightly more pronounced, of course. But why worry about them?" The wolf-lip curled further. "Don’t expect me to believe this aura of altruism, Mr. Prentiss-Rogers. I think you're afraid to face what lies behind our so-called 'reality.'"

        [. . . .]

        He knew in a brief flash of insight, that for sentient, thinking beings, Time
        had suddenly become a barricade rather than an endless road.

        The exploding bomb — the caving cottage walls — were hanging, somewhere, frozen fast in an immutable, eternal stasis.

        Luce had separated this fleeting unseen dimension from the creatures and things that had flowed along it. There is no existence without change along a temporal continuum. And now the continuum had been shattered.

        Was this, then the fate of all tangible things — of all humanity?

        Were none of them — not even the two or three who understod advanced ontology, to — get through?

        [. . . .]

        She'd got through!

        The whole world, and just the two of them!

        His heart was pounding ecstatically as he began to run lithely upwind.

        And they’d keep it this way, simple and sweet, forever, and their children
        after them. To hell with science and progress! (Well, within practical limits, of course.)

        As he ran, there rippled about his quivering nostrils the seductive scent of
        apple blossoms.







        share|improve this answer












        1950: "The New Reality", a novelette by Charles L. Harness, first published in Thrilling Wonder Stories, December 1950, available at the Internet Archive.



        Professor Luce, a mad ontologist, constructs a device with which he intents to reset reality, expecting that only a select few (himself included of course) will survive.




        Prentiss drew deeply on his pipe.

        "I saw it."

        "Did you understand it?"

        "No. It wasn't all there. At least, the apparatus on the table was incomplete. There's more to it than a Nicol prism and a goniometer."

        "Ah, you are clever! Yes, I was wise in not permitting you to remain very long — no longer than necessary to whet your curiosity. Look, then! I offer you a partnership. Check my data and apparatus; in return you may be present when I run the experiment. We will attain enlightenment together. We will know all things. We will be gods!"

        "And what about two billion other human beings?" said Prentiss, pressing softly at his shoulder holster.

        The professor smiled faintly. "Their lunacy — assuming they continue to exist at all — may become slightly more pronounced, of course. But why worry about them?" The wolf-lip curled further. "Don’t expect me to believe this aura of altruism, Mr. Prentiss-Rogers. I think you're afraid to face what lies behind our so-called 'reality.'"

        [. . . .]

        He knew in a brief flash of insight, that for sentient, thinking beings, Time
        had suddenly become a barricade rather than an endless road.

        The exploding bomb — the caving cottage walls — were hanging, somewhere, frozen fast in an immutable, eternal stasis.

        Luce had separated this fleeting unseen dimension from the creatures and things that had flowed along it. There is no existence without change along a temporal continuum. And now the continuum had been shattered.

        Was this, then the fate of all tangible things — of all humanity?

        Were none of them — not even the two or three who understod advanced ontology, to — get through?

        [. . . .]

        She'd got through!

        The whole world, and just the two of them!

        His heart was pounding ecstatically as he began to run lithely upwind.

        And they’d keep it this way, simple and sweet, forever, and their children
        after them. To hell with science and progress! (Well, within practical limits, of course.)

        As he ran, there rippled about his quivering nostrils the seductive scent of
        apple blossoms.








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        user14111

        99.3k6388498




        99.3k6388498

























            1














            Probably not the first, but:

            1964. In Stanley Kubrick's movie Dr. Strangelove, towards the end, with impending nuclear war in sight, the titular character suggests gathering a few hundred thousand selected people (including, of course, top politicians and military personnel) underground to wait for the surface to become habitable again, repopulating the planet. He suggests a 10:1 female/male ratio for faster breeding - which isn't rational in my opinion, since it would probably take several generations before the surface becomes habitable again and you don't want the underground habitat to become overpopulated. But of course, the outlook of having access to plenty of women helps persuade the decision-makers to adopt the plan.






            share|improve this answer





















            • In Dr Strangelove the wipeout was unintentional.
              – DJClayworth
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              Worth noting that this answer was posted before I edited to clarify I was asking about cases where the destruction was intentional.
              – TheLethalCarrot
              1 hour ago
















            1














            Probably not the first, but:

            1964. In Stanley Kubrick's movie Dr. Strangelove, towards the end, with impending nuclear war in sight, the titular character suggests gathering a few hundred thousand selected people (including, of course, top politicians and military personnel) underground to wait for the surface to become habitable again, repopulating the planet. He suggests a 10:1 female/male ratio for faster breeding - which isn't rational in my opinion, since it would probably take several generations before the surface becomes habitable again and you don't want the underground habitat to become overpopulated. But of course, the outlook of having access to plenty of women helps persuade the decision-makers to adopt the plan.






            share|improve this answer





















            • In Dr Strangelove the wipeout was unintentional.
              – DJClayworth
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              Worth noting that this answer was posted before I edited to clarify I was asking about cases where the destruction was intentional.
              – TheLethalCarrot
              1 hour ago














            1












            1








            1






            Probably not the first, but:

            1964. In Stanley Kubrick's movie Dr. Strangelove, towards the end, with impending nuclear war in sight, the titular character suggests gathering a few hundred thousand selected people (including, of course, top politicians and military personnel) underground to wait for the surface to become habitable again, repopulating the planet. He suggests a 10:1 female/male ratio for faster breeding - which isn't rational in my opinion, since it would probably take several generations before the surface becomes habitable again and you don't want the underground habitat to become overpopulated. But of course, the outlook of having access to plenty of women helps persuade the decision-makers to adopt the plan.






            share|improve this answer












            Probably not the first, but:

            1964. In Stanley Kubrick's movie Dr. Strangelove, towards the end, with impending nuclear war in sight, the titular character suggests gathering a few hundred thousand selected people (including, of course, top politicians and military personnel) underground to wait for the surface to become habitable again, repopulating the planet. He suggests a 10:1 female/male ratio for faster breeding - which isn't rational in my opinion, since it would probably take several generations before the surface becomes habitable again and you don't want the underground habitat to become overpopulated. But of course, the outlook of having access to plenty of women helps persuade the decision-makers to adopt the plan.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 hours ago









            Klaus Æ. Mogensen

            6,29921926




            6,29921926












            • In Dr Strangelove the wipeout was unintentional.
              – DJClayworth
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              Worth noting that this answer was posted before I edited to clarify I was asking about cases where the destruction was intentional.
              – TheLethalCarrot
              1 hour ago


















            • In Dr Strangelove the wipeout was unintentional.
              – DJClayworth
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              Worth noting that this answer was posted before I edited to clarify I was asking about cases where the destruction was intentional.
              – TheLethalCarrot
              1 hour ago
















            In Dr Strangelove the wipeout was unintentional.
            – DJClayworth
            1 hour ago




            In Dr Strangelove the wipeout was unintentional.
            – DJClayworth
            1 hour ago




            1




            1




            Worth noting that this answer was posted before I edited to clarify I was asking about cases where the destruction was intentional.
            – TheLethalCarrot
            1 hour ago




            Worth noting that this answer was posted before I edited to clarify I was asking about cases where the destruction was intentional.
            – TheLethalCarrot
            1 hour ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202686%2fwhich-sff-work-first-had-the-idea-of-the-antagonist-restarting-life-by-deliberat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Understanding the information contained in the Deep Space Network XML data?

            Ross-on-Wye

            Eastern Orthodox Church