Why is there a “to” before increase?
Today I read a sentence below:
The employment rate has continued to rise in big cities thanks to the efforts of the local governments to increase it.
Why is there a "to" used before word "increase", it reads hard, does this sentence wrong? Cause there is a "thanks to" in this sentence?
parsing
migrated from english.stackexchange.com 3 hours ago
This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.
add a comment |
Today I read a sentence below:
The employment rate has continued to rise in big cities thanks to the efforts of the local governments to increase it.
Why is there a "to" used before word "increase", it reads hard, does this sentence wrong? Cause there is a "thanks to" in this sentence?
parsing
migrated from english.stackexchange.com 3 hours ago
This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.
1
"To" is a clause subordinator introducing a to-infinitival clause.
– BillJ
2 hours ago
The simple answer is that non-finite complements of nouns are always to-infinitivals. There's no particular reason; it's just a fact of English grammar.
– BillJ
1 hour ago
Note that the efforts of the local governments to increase [the employment rate] is a noun phrase, making it something the writer can "thank". I suspect you're trying to analyse it as a "sentence / statement" - The efforts of the local governments increase the employment rate (no to "infinitive marker", because increase there is a "finite / conjugated" form, where those efforts are the plural "subject" of the verb).
– FumbleFingers
42 mins ago
add a comment |
Today I read a sentence below:
The employment rate has continued to rise in big cities thanks to the efforts of the local governments to increase it.
Why is there a "to" used before word "increase", it reads hard, does this sentence wrong? Cause there is a "thanks to" in this sentence?
parsing
Today I read a sentence below:
The employment rate has continued to rise in big cities thanks to the efforts of the local governments to increase it.
Why is there a "to" used before word "increase", it reads hard, does this sentence wrong? Cause there is a "thanks to" in this sentence?
parsing
parsing
edited 2 hours ago
userr2684291
2,60121531
2,60121531
asked 4 hours ago
webkws
61
61
migrated from english.stackexchange.com 3 hours ago
This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.
migrated from english.stackexchange.com 3 hours ago
This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.
1
"To" is a clause subordinator introducing a to-infinitival clause.
– BillJ
2 hours ago
The simple answer is that non-finite complements of nouns are always to-infinitivals. There's no particular reason; it's just a fact of English grammar.
– BillJ
1 hour ago
Note that the efforts of the local governments to increase [the employment rate] is a noun phrase, making it something the writer can "thank". I suspect you're trying to analyse it as a "sentence / statement" - The efforts of the local governments increase the employment rate (no to "infinitive marker", because increase there is a "finite / conjugated" form, where those efforts are the plural "subject" of the verb).
– FumbleFingers
42 mins ago
add a comment |
1
"To" is a clause subordinator introducing a to-infinitival clause.
– BillJ
2 hours ago
The simple answer is that non-finite complements of nouns are always to-infinitivals. There's no particular reason; it's just a fact of English grammar.
– BillJ
1 hour ago
Note that the efforts of the local governments to increase [the employment rate] is a noun phrase, making it something the writer can "thank". I suspect you're trying to analyse it as a "sentence / statement" - The efforts of the local governments increase the employment rate (no to "infinitive marker", because increase there is a "finite / conjugated" form, where those efforts are the plural "subject" of the verb).
– FumbleFingers
42 mins ago
1
1
"To" is a clause subordinator introducing a to-infinitival clause.
– BillJ
2 hours ago
"To" is a clause subordinator introducing a to-infinitival clause.
– BillJ
2 hours ago
The simple answer is that non-finite complements of nouns are always to-infinitivals. There's no particular reason; it's just a fact of English grammar.
– BillJ
1 hour ago
The simple answer is that non-finite complements of nouns are always to-infinitivals. There's no particular reason; it's just a fact of English grammar.
– BillJ
1 hour ago
Note that the efforts of the local governments to increase [the employment rate] is a noun phrase, making it something the writer can "thank". I suspect you're trying to analyse it as a "sentence / statement" - The efforts of the local governments increase the employment rate (no to "infinitive marker", because increase there is a "finite / conjugated" form, where those efforts are the plural "subject" of the verb).
– FumbleFingers
42 mins ago
Note that the efforts of the local governments to increase [the employment rate] is a noun phrase, making it something the writer can "thank". I suspect you're trying to analyse it as a "sentence / statement" - The efforts of the local governments increase the employment rate (no to "infinitive marker", because increase there is a "finite / conjugated" form, where those efforts are the plural "subject" of the verb).
– FumbleFingers
42 mins ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
If you want a simple answer, I'm afraid I don't have one for you. In English the infinitive of a verb, words like "to play", "to walk" or "to think" can be used as "to-infinitives" (where the particle 'to' is included), and "bare-infinitives" (without the particle 'to'). The bare-infinitives are the headwords of dictionaries.
When you can use one or the other depends on specific rules, which are outlined in this Wikipedia article, which shows when you can use the to-infinitive or the bare-infinitive bare-infinitives.
Cases where the "bare-infinitive" is allowed is in constructions like:
I can to speak English.
I will to go to bed.
The loud bang made me to jump.
If you follow that article I linked you'll come down to a list of examples where the "to-infinitive" must be used. It shows:
As a modifier of certain nouns and adjectives:
the reason to laugh
the effort to expand
anxious to get a ticket
to-infinitive
In certain cases you can reform the construction by using "of + present participle", such as "I made the effort of trying it."
If you go to this site, which is a grammar checker, and copy and paste the following in:
I made the effort leave my school. I made the effort of leaving my
school. I made the decision stop my habit. I made the decision of
stopping my habit.
You'll see that it highlights "effort leave" and "decision stop", as there needs to be the particle "to" in between the two words.
In your sentence the "thanks to" means the same thing as "due to" or "because of". This part does not have any bearing on whether "to" needs to be included. Think of the following sentences and ask yourself if they are grammatical:
I made the effort clean my room.
He made a strong effort win the competition.
It makes no difference in this case if it's the efforts of the government, an effort or a decision or an attempt is generally "to do" something, ie., a "to-infinitive" verb,
Here are some dictionary entries for the use of "effort".
2.It was an effort to get up.
3.Make an effort to arrive promptly.
American Heritage Dictionary
2.a our effort to save him failed.
Collins English Dictionary
Thanks a a lot,I suddenly see the light.I should have known the "to" means purpose,but I just realize the role is "efforts","of the local governments" is additional burden of this sentence!
– webkws
1 hour ago
add a comment |
A to is required for the sentence to make grammatical sense regardless of the thanks to.
Please explain the structure of the sentence so that the asker could understand why the to is needed.
– userr2684291
2 hours ago
add a comment |
thanks to the efforts of the local government to increase it
There are three modifiers attached to the noun "efforts": the definite article, a prepositional phrase, and an infinitive phrase. The entire noun phrase "the efforts of the local government to increase it" is the object of the preposition "to", which attaches this noun phrase to the word "thanks".
Let's look at what happens without the "to" before "increase":
The efforts of the local government increase it.
This is a complete independent clause. Without the "to", "increase" works as a finite verb. It has tense. It creates a predicate which requires a subject. This version can stand as a sentence on its own. It cannot act as the object of "thanks to".
The infinitive phrase "to increase it" represents the purpose of the efforts. The predicate "increase it" would represent the action of the efforts.
Without the "to" before "increase", we're left with a clause that does not attach to the prior clause, leaving the sentence broken. We're also left with a clause that carries a different meaning than the noun phrase in the original version of the sentence.
With the "to" before "increase", we're left with a noun phrase that acts as the object of the "to" after "thanks". The sentence is coherent. The meaning is clear.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f191490%2fwhy-is-there-a-to-before-increase%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If you want a simple answer, I'm afraid I don't have one for you. In English the infinitive of a verb, words like "to play", "to walk" or "to think" can be used as "to-infinitives" (where the particle 'to' is included), and "bare-infinitives" (without the particle 'to'). The bare-infinitives are the headwords of dictionaries.
When you can use one or the other depends on specific rules, which are outlined in this Wikipedia article, which shows when you can use the to-infinitive or the bare-infinitive bare-infinitives.
Cases where the "bare-infinitive" is allowed is in constructions like:
I can to speak English.
I will to go to bed.
The loud bang made me to jump.
If you follow that article I linked you'll come down to a list of examples where the "to-infinitive" must be used. It shows:
As a modifier of certain nouns and adjectives:
the reason to laugh
the effort to expand
anxious to get a ticket
to-infinitive
In certain cases you can reform the construction by using "of + present participle", such as "I made the effort of trying it."
If you go to this site, which is a grammar checker, and copy and paste the following in:
I made the effort leave my school. I made the effort of leaving my
school. I made the decision stop my habit. I made the decision of
stopping my habit.
You'll see that it highlights "effort leave" and "decision stop", as there needs to be the particle "to" in between the two words.
In your sentence the "thanks to" means the same thing as "due to" or "because of". This part does not have any bearing on whether "to" needs to be included. Think of the following sentences and ask yourself if they are grammatical:
I made the effort clean my room.
He made a strong effort win the competition.
It makes no difference in this case if it's the efforts of the government, an effort or a decision or an attempt is generally "to do" something, ie., a "to-infinitive" verb,
Here are some dictionary entries for the use of "effort".
2.It was an effort to get up.
3.Make an effort to arrive promptly.
American Heritage Dictionary
2.a our effort to save him failed.
Collins English Dictionary
Thanks a a lot,I suddenly see the light.I should have known the "to" means purpose,but I just realize the role is "efforts","of the local governments" is additional burden of this sentence!
– webkws
1 hour ago
add a comment |
If you want a simple answer, I'm afraid I don't have one for you. In English the infinitive of a verb, words like "to play", "to walk" or "to think" can be used as "to-infinitives" (where the particle 'to' is included), and "bare-infinitives" (without the particle 'to'). The bare-infinitives are the headwords of dictionaries.
When you can use one or the other depends on specific rules, which are outlined in this Wikipedia article, which shows when you can use the to-infinitive or the bare-infinitive bare-infinitives.
Cases where the "bare-infinitive" is allowed is in constructions like:
I can to speak English.
I will to go to bed.
The loud bang made me to jump.
If you follow that article I linked you'll come down to a list of examples where the "to-infinitive" must be used. It shows:
As a modifier of certain nouns and adjectives:
the reason to laugh
the effort to expand
anxious to get a ticket
to-infinitive
In certain cases you can reform the construction by using "of + present participle", such as "I made the effort of trying it."
If you go to this site, which is a grammar checker, and copy and paste the following in:
I made the effort leave my school. I made the effort of leaving my
school. I made the decision stop my habit. I made the decision of
stopping my habit.
You'll see that it highlights "effort leave" and "decision stop", as there needs to be the particle "to" in between the two words.
In your sentence the "thanks to" means the same thing as "due to" or "because of". This part does not have any bearing on whether "to" needs to be included. Think of the following sentences and ask yourself if they are grammatical:
I made the effort clean my room.
He made a strong effort win the competition.
It makes no difference in this case if it's the efforts of the government, an effort or a decision or an attempt is generally "to do" something, ie., a "to-infinitive" verb,
Here are some dictionary entries for the use of "effort".
2.It was an effort to get up.
3.Make an effort to arrive promptly.
American Heritage Dictionary
2.a our effort to save him failed.
Collins English Dictionary
Thanks a a lot,I suddenly see the light.I should have known the "to" means purpose,but I just realize the role is "efforts","of the local governments" is additional burden of this sentence!
– webkws
1 hour ago
add a comment |
If you want a simple answer, I'm afraid I don't have one for you. In English the infinitive of a verb, words like "to play", "to walk" or "to think" can be used as "to-infinitives" (where the particle 'to' is included), and "bare-infinitives" (without the particle 'to'). The bare-infinitives are the headwords of dictionaries.
When you can use one or the other depends on specific rules, which are outlined in this Wikipedia article, which shows when you can use the to-infinitive or the bare-infinitive bare-infinitives.
Cases where the "bare-infinitive" is allowed is in constructions like:
I can to speak English.
I will to go to bed.
The loud bang made me to jump.
If you follow that article I linked you'll come down to a list of examples where the "to-infinitive" must be used. It shows:
As a modifier of certain nouns and adjectives:
the reason to laugh
the effort to expand
anxious to get a ticket
to-infinitive
In certain cases you can reform the construction by using "of + present participle", such as "I made the effort of trying it."
If you go to this site, which is a grammar checker, and copy and paste the following in:
I made the effort leave my school. I made the effort of leaving my
school. I made the decision stop my habit. I made the decision of
stopping my habit.
You'll see that it highlights "effort leave" and "decision stop", as there needs to be the particle "to" in between the two words.
In your sentence the "thanks to" means the same thing as "due to" or "because of". This part does not have any bearing on whether "to" needs to be included. Think of the following sentences and ask yourself if they are grammatical:
I made the effort clean my room.
He made a strong effort win the competition.
It makes no difference in this case if it's the efforts of the government, an effort or a decision or an attempt is generally "to do" something, ie., a "to-infinitive" verb,
Here are some dictionary entries for the use of "effort".
2.It was an effort to get up.
3.Make an effort to arrive promptly.
American Heritage Dictionary
2.a our effort to save him failed.
Collins English Dictionary
If you want a simple answer, I'm afraid I don't have one for you. In English the infinitive of a verb, words like "to play", "to walk" or "to think" can be used as "to-infinitives" (where the particle 'to' is included), and "bare-infinitives" (without the particle 'to'). The bare-infinitives are the headwords of dictionaries.
When you can use one or the other depends on specific rules, which are outlined in this Wikipedia article, which shows when you can use the to-infinitive or the bare-infinitive bare-infinitives.
Cases where the "bare-infinitive" is allowed is in constructions like:
I can to speak English.
I will to go to bed.
The loud bang made me to jump.
If you follow that article I linked you'll come down to a list of examples where the "to-infinitive" must be used. It shows:
As a modifier of certain nouns and adjectives:
the reason to laugh
the effort to expand
anxious to get a ticket
to-infinitive
In certain cases you can reform the construction by using "of + present participle", such as "I made the effort of trying it."
If you go to this site, which is a grammar checker, and copy and paste the following in:
I made the effort leave my school. I made the effort of leaving my
school. I made the decision stop my habit. I made the decision of
stopping my habit.
You'll see that it highlights "effort leave" and "decision stop", as there needs to be the particle "to" in between the two words.
In your sentence the "thanks to" means the same thing as "due to" or "because of". This part does not have any bearing on whether "to" needs to be included. Think of the following sentences and ask yourself if they are grammatical:
I made the effort clean my room.
He made a strong effort win the competition.
It makes no difference in this case if it's the efforts of the government, an effort or a decision or an attempt is generally "to do" something, ie., a "to-infinitive" verb,
Here are some dictionary entries for the use of "effort".
2.It was an effort to get up.
3.Make an effort to arrive promptly.
American Heritage Dictionary
2.a our effort to save him failed.
Collins English Dictionary
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
Zebrafish
2664
2664
Thanks a a lot,I suddenly see the light.I should have known the "to" means purpose,but I just realize the role is "efforts","of the local governments" is additional burden of this sentence!
– webkws
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks a a lot,I suddenly see the light.I should have known the "to" means purpose,but I just realize the role is "efforts","of the local governments" is additional burden of this sentence!
– webkws
1 hour ago
Thanks a a lot,I suddenly see the light.I should have known the "to" means purpose,but I just realize the role is "efforts","of the local governments" is additional burden of this sentence!
– webkws
1 hour ago
Thanks a a lot,I suddenly see the light.I should have known the "to" means purpose,but I just realize the role is "efforts","of the local governments" is additional burden of this sentence!
– webkws
1 hour ago
add a comment |
A to is required for the sentence to make grammatical sense regardless of the thanks to.
Please explain the structure of the sentence so that the asker could understand why the to is needed.
– userr2684291
2 hours ago
add a comment |
A to is required for the sentence to make grammatical sense regardless of the thanks to.
Please explain the structure of the sentence so that the asker could understand why the to is needed.
– userr2684291
2 hours ago
add a comment |
A to is required for the sentence to make grammatical sense regardless of the thanks to.
A to is required for the sentence to make grammatical sense regardless of the thanks to.
answered 3 hours ago
Daniil Manokhin
1,29417
1,29417
Please explain the structure of the sentence so that the asker could understand why the to is needed.
– userr2684291
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Please explain the structure of the sentence so that the asker could understand why the to is needed.
– userr2684291
2 hours ago
Please explain the structure of the sentence so that the asker could understand why the to is needed.
– userr2684291
2 hours ago
Please explain the structure of the sentence so that the asker could understand why the to is needed.
– userr2684291
2 hours ago
add a comment |
thanks to the efforts of the local government to increase it
There are three modifiers attached to the noun "efforts": the definite article, a prepositional phrase, and an infinitive phrase. The entire noun phrase "the efforts of the local government to increase it" is the object of the preposition "to", which attaches this noun phrase to the word "thanks".
Let's look at what happens without the "to" before "increase":
The efforts of the local government increase it.
This is a complete independent clause. Without the "to", "increase" works as a finite verb. It has tense. It creates a predicate which requires a subject. This version can stand as a sentence on its own. It cannot act as the object of "thanks to".
The infinitive phrase "to increase it" represents the purpose of the efforts. The predicate "increase it" would represent the action of the efforts.
Without the "to" before "increase", we're left with a clause that does not attach to the prior clause, leaving the sentence broken. We're also left with a clause that carries a different meaning than the noun phrase in the original version of the sentence.
With the "to" before "increase", we're left with a noun phrase that acts as the object of the "to" after "thanks". The sentence is coherent. The meaning is clear.
add a comment |
thanks to the efforts of the local government to increase it
There are three modifiers attached to the noun "efforts": the definite article, a prepositional phrase, and an infinitive phrase. The entire noun phrase "the efforts of the local government to increase it" is the object of the preposition "to", which attaches this noun phrase to the word "thanks".
Let's look at what happens without the "to" before "increase":
The efforts of the local government increase it.
This is a complete independent clause. Without the "to", "increase" works as a finite verb. It has tense. It creates a predicate which requires a subject. This version can stand as a sentence on its own. It cannot act as the object of "thanks to".
The infinitive phrase "to increase it" represents the purpose of the efforts. The predicate "increase it" would represent the action of the efforts.
Without the "to" before "increase", we're left with a clause that does not attach to the prior clause, leaving the sentence broken. We're also left with a clause that carries a different meaning than the noun phrase in the original version of the sentence.
With the "to" before "increase", we're left with a noun phrase that acts as the object of the "to" after "thanks". The sentence is coherent. The meaning is clear.
add a comment |
thanks to the efforts of the local government to increase it
There are three modifiers attached to the noun "efforts": the definite article, a prepositional phrase, and an infinitive phrase. The entire noun phrase "the efforts of the local government to increase it" is the object of the preposition "to", which attaches this noun phrase to the word "thanks".
Let's look at what happens without the "to" before "increase":
The efforts of the local government increase it.
This is a complete independent clause. Without the "to", "increase" works as a finite verb. It has tense. It creates a predicate which requires a subject. This version can stand as a sentence on its own. It cannot act as the object of "thanks to".
The infinitive phrase "to increase it" represents the purpose of the efforts. The predicate "increase it" would represent the action of the efforts.
Without the "to" before "increase", we're left with a clause that does not attach to the prior clause, leaving the sentence broken. We're also left with a clause that carries a different meaning than the noun phrase in the original version of the sentence.
With the "to" before "increase", we're left with a noun phrase that acts as the object of the "to" after "thanks". The sentence is coherent. The meaning is clear.
thanks to the efforts of the local government to increase it
There are three modifiers attached to the noun "efforts": the definite article, a prepositional phrase, and an infinitive phrase. The entire noun phrase "the efforts of the local government to increase it" is the object of the preposition "to", which attaches this noun phrase to the word "thanks".
Let's look at what happens without the "to" before "increase":
The efforts of the local government increase it.
This is a complete independent clause. Without the "to", "increase" works as a finite verb. It has tense. It creates a predicate which requires a subject. This version can stand as a sentence on its own. It cannot act as the object of "thanks to".
The infinitive phrase "to increase it" represents the purpose of the efforts. The predicate "increase it" would represent the action of the efforts.
Without the "to" before "increase", we're left with a clause that does not attach to the prior clause, leaving the sentence broken. We're also left with a clause that carries a different meaning than the noun phrase in the original version of the sentence.
With the "to" before "increase", we're left with a noun phrase that acts as the object of the "to" after "thanks". The sentence is coherent. The meaning is clear.
answered 1 hour ago
Gary Botnovcan
8,884926
8,884926
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f191490%2fwhy-is-there-a-to-before-increase%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
"To" is a clause subordinator introducing a to-infinitival clause.
– BillJ
2 hours ago
The simple answer is that non-finite complements of nouns are always to-infinitivals. There's no particular reason; it's just a fact of English grammar.
– BillJ
1 hour ago
Note that the efforts of the local governments to increase [the employment rate] is a noun phrase, making it something the writer can "thank". I suspect you're trying to analyse it as a "sentence / statement" - The efforts of the local governments increase the employment rate (no to "infinitive marker", because increase there is a "finite / conjugated" form, where those efforts are the plural "subject" of the verb).
– FumbleFingers
42 mins ago