How to remove unnecessary fills in the eagle polygon?












1














There are a lot of resistors and diodes on the board, where the polygon passes like this. How can I get rid of it?
enter image description here










share|improve this question



























    1














    There are a lot of resistors and diodes on the board, where the polygon passes like this. How can I get rid of it?
    enter image description here










    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1







      There are a lot of resistors and diodes on the board, where the polygon passes like this. How can I get rid of it?
      enter image description here










      share|improve this question













      There are a lot of resistors and diodes on the board, where the polygon passes like this. How can I get rid of it?
      enter image description here







      pcb eagle polygon






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 2 hours ago









      Алекс Гарисон

      415




      415






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.



          Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.

          The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.



          Example:
          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • That helped! Thank you!
            – Алекс Гарисон
            1 hour ago



















          0














          They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.






          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
            StackExchange.schematics.init();
            });
            }, "cicuitlab");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "135"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f415015%2fhow-to-remove-unnecessary-fills-in-the-eagle-polygon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3














            You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.



            Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.

            The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.



            Example:
            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer





















            • That helped! Thank you!
              – Алекс Гарисон
              1 hour ago
















            3














            You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.



            Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.

            The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.



            Example:
            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer





















            • That helped! Thank you!
              – Алекс Гарисон
              1 hour ago














            3












            3








            3






            You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.



            Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.

            The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.



            Example:
            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer












            You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.



            Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.

            The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.



            Example:
            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 1 hour ago









            Jeroen3

            11.2k1648




            11.2k1648












            • That helped! Thank you!
              – Алекс Гарисон
              1 hour ago


















            • That helped! Thank you!
              – Алекс Гарисон
              1 hour ago
















            That helped! Thank you!
            – Алекс Гарисон
            1 hour ago




            That helped! Thank you!
            – Алекс Гарисон
            1 hour ago













            0














            They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.






            share|improve this answer


























              0














              They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.






              share|improve this answer
























                0












                0








                0






                They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.






                share|improve this answer












                They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 1 hour ago









                awjlogan

                3,35811227




                3,35811227






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f415015%2fhow-to-remove-unnecessary-fills-in-the-eagle-polygon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Eastern Orthodox Church

                    Zagreb

                    Understanding the information contained in the Deep Space Network XML data?