Dispute grade penalty for reading in class?











up vote
8
down vote

favorite












I am in an large, entry level course targeted at engineers. A few weeks ago, I was reading for another class while my professor covered material I was familiar with, and she marked me down as absent for at least one and maybe two classes. She has a strict attendance policy so that she gives a 5 percent penalty for missing three or more classes, and I already have three marked absences.



The only relevant section in the syllabus says, "Good manners provide the foundation for proper classroom behavior: arrive on time, listen attentively and take detailed notes, remain quietly in your seat until dismissed by the instructor." There is a strict no-screen policy, but nothing about reading.



I am considering taking it up the ladder and arguing that she should have asked me to put the book away if she wanted me to, as I spoke to her multiple times between the time of the alleged offense and becoming aware that she had penalized me for it. Do I have a good chance of a grade appeal? on merit? statistically?



She is a teaching only professor, so I assume she doesn't have huge sway in the department. It is a ginormous class at a large school though, so I probably don't either.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Irritated is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Do you mean that you were reading in class on only one day, but there is a possibility that you were penalized for this with two absences, or were you reading in class on multiple days?
    – 1006a
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    Administrators step in when things are extreme and the school's reputation may be affected, like failing everyone or giving everyone A's. Your argument is pretty weak and your injury (losing a few points) is trivial. You'd be better off nicely asking your teacher for another chance because you didn't realize reading wasn't allowed, and you had misjudged your own ability to multitask.
    – A Simple Algorithm
    2 hours ago










  • Are you certain she didn't accidentally mark you absent because she genuinely thought you were absent?
    – Vaelus
    1 hour ago















up vote
8
down vote

favorite












I am in an large, entry level course targeted at engineers. A few weeks ago, I was reading for another class while my professor covered material I was familiar with, and she marked me down as absent for at least one and maybe two classes. She has a strict attendance policy so that she gives a 5 percent penalty for missing three or more classes, and I already have three marked absences.



The only relevant section in the syllabus says, "Good manners provide the foundation for proper classroom behavior: arrive on time, listen attentively and take detailed notes, remain quietly in your seat until dismissed by the instructor." There is a strict no-screen policy, but nothing about reading.



I am considering taking it up the ladder and arguing that she should have asked me to put the book away if she wanted me to, as I spoke to her multiple times between the time of the alleged offense and becoming aware that she had penalized me for it. Do I have a good chance of a grade appeal? on merit? statistically?



She is a teaching only professor, so I assume she doesn't have huge sway in the department. It is a ginormous class at a large school though, so I probably don't either.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Irritated is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Do you mean that you were reading in class on only one day, but there is a possibility that you were penalized for this with two absences, or were you reading in class on multiple days?
    – 1006a
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    Administrators step in when things are extreme and the school's reputation may be affected, like failing everyone or giving everyone A's. Your argument is pretty weak and your injury (losing a few points) is trivial. You'd be better off nicely asking your teacher for another chance because you didn't realize reading wasn't allowed, and you had misjudged your own ability to multitask.
    – A Simple Algorithm
    2 hours ago










  • Are you certain she didn't accidentally mark you absent because she genuinely thought you were absent?
    – Vaelus
    1 hour ago













up vote
8
down vote

favorite









up vote
8
down vote

favorite











I am in an large, entry level course targeted at engineers. A few weeks ago, I was reading for another class while my professor covered material I was familiar with, and she marked me down as absent for at least one and maybe two classes. She has a strict attendance policy so that she gives a 5 percent penalty for missing three or more classes, and I already have three marked absences.



The only relevant section in the syllabus says, "Good manners provide the foundation for proper classroom behavior: arrive on time, listen attentively and take detailed notes, remain quietly in your seat until dismissed by the instructor." There is a strict no-screen policy, but nothing about reading.



I am considering taking it up the ladder and arguing that she should have asked me to put the book away if she wanted me to, as I spoke to her multiple times between the time of the alleged offense and becoming aware that she had penalized me for it. Do I have a good chance of a grade appeal? on merit? statistically?



She is a teaching only professor, so I assume she doesn't have huge sway in the department. It is a ginormous class at a large school though, so I probably don't either.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Irritated is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I am in an large, entry level course targeted at engineers. A few weeks ago, I was reading for another class while my professor covered material I was familiar with, and she marked me down as absent for at least one and maybe two classes. She has a strict attendance policy so that she gives a 5 percent penalty for missing three or more classes, and I already have three marked absences.



The only relevant section in the syllabus says, "Good manners provide the foundation for proper classroom behavior: arrive on time, listen attentively and take detailed notes, remain quietly in your seat until dismissed by the instructor." There is a strict no-screen policy, but nothing about reading.



I am considering taking it up the ladder and arguing that she should have asked me to put the book away if she wanted me to, as I spoke to her multiple times between the time of the alleged offense and becoming aware that she had penalized me for it. Do I have a good chance of a grade appeal? on merit? statistically?



She is a teaching only professor, so I assume she doesn't have huge sway in the department. It is a ginormous class at a large school though, so I probably don't either.







professors






share|improve this question







New contributor




Irritated is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Irritated is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Irritated is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 6 hours ago









Irritated

441




441




New contributor




Irritated is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Irritated is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Irritated is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Do you mean that you were reading in class on only one day, but there is a possibility that you were penalized for this with two absences, or were you reading in class on multiple days?
    – 1006a
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    Administrators step in when things are extreme and the school's reputation may be affected, like failing everyone or giving everyone A's. Your argument is pretty weak and your injury (losing a few points) is trivial. You'd be better off nicely asking your teacher for another chance because you didn't realize reading wasn't allowed, and you had misjudged your own ability to multitask.
    – A Simple Algorithm
    2 hours ago










  • Are you certain she didn't accidentally mark you absent because she genuinely thought you were absent?
    – Vaelus
    1 hour ago


















  • Do you mean that you were reading in class on only one day, but there is a possibility that you were penalized for this with two absences, or were you reading in class on multiple days?
    – 1006a
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    Administrators step in when things are extreme and the school's reputation may be affected, like failing everyone or giving everyone A's. Your argument is pretty weak and your injury (losing a few points) is trivial. You'd be better off nicely asking your teacher for another chance because you didn't realize reading wasn't allowed, and you had misjudged your own ability to multitask.
    – A Simple Algorithm
    2 hours ago










  • Are you certain she didn't accidentally mark you absent because she genuinely thought you were absent?
    – Vaelus
    1 hour ago
















Do you mean that you were reading in class on only one day, but there is a possibility that you were penalized for this with two absences, or were you reading in class on multiple days?
– 1006a
4 hours ago




Do you mean that you were reading in class on only one day, but there is a possibility that you were penalized for this with two absences, or were you reading in class on multiple days?
– 1006a
4 hours ago




2




2




Administrators step in when things are extreme and the school's reputation may be affected, like failing everyone or giving everyone A's. Your argument is pretty weak and your injury (losing a few points) is trivial. You'd be better off nicely asking your teacher for another chance because you didn't realize reading wasn't allowed, and you had misjudged your own ability to multitask.
– A Simple Algorithm
2 hours ago




Administrators step in when things are extreme and the school's reputation may be affected, like failing everyone or giving everyone A's. Your argument is pretty weak and your injury (losing a few points) is trivial. You'd be better off nicely asking your teacher for another chance because you didn't realize reading wasn't allowed, and you had misjudged your own ability to multitask.
– A Simple Algorithm
2 hours ago












Are you certain she didn't accidentally mark you absent because she genuinely thought you were absent?
– Vaelus
1 hour ago




Are you certain she didn't accidentally mark you absent because she genuinely thought you were absent?
– Vaelus
1 hour ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
18
down vote














The only relevant section in the syllabus says, "Good manners provide the foundation for proper classroom behavior: arrive on time, listen attentively and take detailed notes, remain quietly in your seat until dismissed by the instructor." There is a strict no-screen policy, but nothing about reading.




I am pretty sure that all department chairs would agree with a faculty member who concluded that reading in class is the opposite of listen attentively and take detailed notes. I would put your chances at exactly zero that the chair would override the decision to not credit you with attendance on that day, but marking you as absent for two days does not seem justified unless there is another penalty for not following proper classroom behavior.






share|improve this answer





















  • Would all department chairs also agree that “take detailed notes” has anything whatsoever to do with either “good manners” or “proper classroom behavior”? I’m not so sure (in fact, as a former department chair I’m pretty sure I would not agree to those assertions). Moreover, I’m not sure I’d agree that a professor has the authority to mandate her students to listen to her or risk a grade penalty.
    – Dan Romik
    1 hour ago










  • @DanRomik I am not sure how note taking fits with good manners, but I think of a syllabus as being as being as close as most classes get to a learning contract. A chair or a colleague might suggest not to do that in the future, but it is not so egregious that a chair should step in.
    – StrongBad
    27 mins ago


















up vote
3
down vote













Your best chance is to ask for probation, but you must also admit a no-brainer. It's all in here, try this:




"I am writing concerning the two absences I was deducted on account of reading unrelated textbooks during class. I request probation to have the statutory absences removed, but only on the condition that during finals I present responsible class notes for the remainder of the semester. As an engineering student, I should know that reading a textbook applies to the same principle as a the policy ban on mobile screens in class. Though this is an introductory class, covering information with which I consider myself to be familiar, I will hold a newfound respect for the importance of both foundational skills and the demonstrable pedagogical value of reviewing them. My grades are of concern to me, so if you as the lecturing professor will not grant me an achievable probation, I will appeal by forwarding this same letter to the department chair, but no higher."







share|improve this answer








New contributor




Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 2




    This isn't bad, but I would be more concise, less sesquipedalian, and would certainly avoid the threat in the last sentence. Something like "I am writing to apologize for reading textbooks during class. My only excuse is that I was already familiar with the particular material you were presenting on the day in question. But of course I now realize that this is not allowed. I would really appreciate it if you would reconsider penalizing my attendance over this matter. I will certainly not do it again."
    – cag51
    2 hours ago












  • @cag51 I respect your rep, you have good points. The goal is to help a student learn and get these absences reversed fairly. Being sesquipedalian could go either way. IMHE some profs like big words and especially respect students who consider pedagogical method. Academic rule #1 is that we don't know until we try. I use use Satir's "Computer Mode", which is often wise. IMHO, I only disagree: 1. you defend, then concede; that's Satir's "Placater Mode", seems good, won't work, 2. the final is no threat, but a needed reminder of process, prerogative, what next, and self-limit; respectful overall.
    – Jesse Steele
    1 hour ago










  • ...If you have a right to appeal, always remind everyone of that in a respectful, matter-of-fact way. Even if the person you disagree with "feels" threatened, they aren't allowed to say so because it is a matter of rights and procedure. Omit the part about your rights and you're toast; this isn't theoretical, it's experience. Respect comes from the overall tone. This letter clearly regards the prof as mostly in the right and does not bow. That's the best change.
    – Jesse Steele
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    Thanks for explanation. I admit I was thinking mostly about what I would find most compelling if I were the teacher (this draft would really rub me the wrong way), but, on the other hand, I really disagree with this professor's policy, so fair to say that my reaction to the letter might not be a fair gauge of this professor's reaction. In any case, time for me to go read about Satir's modes :-)
    – cag51
    1 hour ago












  • @cag51 And your comments also, ty. I might edit/add some "diplomacy explanation" to my answer later. I had some links to Satir here: interpersonal.stackexchange.com/q/20022/22996. On my phone, ttyl
    – Jesse Steele
    1 hour ago


















up vote
1
down vote













I would still take it up the ladder since that sounds like a stupid policy.



In my opinion, if she's not able to keep your interest, she should consider raising the level of the class, but there's only so much she can raise it without losing other students. It's not always possible to keep everyone's interest and you can't expect students to feign interest because it makes you feel important.



What does she care if you're quietly reading? It sounds like she childishly wants to be listened to. That's beyond wanting "good manners". She wants devotion.



You might as well complain to her dean. Even if you don't get what you want, if enough people complain, it's at least annoying for the dean who might pass the message on to her in one way or another.






share|improve this answer





















  • It may be a reaction to past problems - students not being aware of important information because, even though physically present, they were mentally absent.
    – Patricia Shanahan
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    @PatriciaShanahan Most classes factor that kind of problem into grades using examinations rather than attendance.
    – Neil G
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    I agree that it is an unwise policy, but most universities will give their professor's considerable latitude and discretion. Something can be unwise, even clearly unwise, and still be well within a decision maker's authority.
    – TimothyAWiseman
    2 hours ago










  • I agree with both of you -- escalating is unlikely to get your points back, but this is such a stupid policy (insisting that your students waste time listening to material they already know) that I would still send a complaint anyway. (Though, groveling to the instructor to try to get the points back might be necessary until grades are finalized)
    – cag51
    2 hours ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Irritated is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f120877%2fdispute-grade-penalty-for-reading-in-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
18
down vote














The only relevant section in the syllabus says, "Good manners provide the foundation for proper classroom behavior: arrive on time, listen attentively and take detailed notes, remain quietly in your seat until dismissed by the instructor." There is a strict no-screen policy, but nothing about reading.




I am pretty sure that all department chairs would agree with a faculty member who concluded that reading in class is the opposite of listen attentively and take detailed notes. I would put your chances at exactly zero that the chair would override the decision to not credit you with attendance on that day, but marking you as absent for two days does not seem justified unless there is another penalty for not following proper classroom behavior.






share|improve this answer





















  • Would all department chairs also agree that “take detailed notes” has anything whatsoever to do with either “good manners” or “proper classroom behavior”? I’m not so sure (in fact, as a former department chair I’m pretty sure I would not agree to those assertions). Moreover, I’m not sure I’d agree that a professor has the authority to mandate her students to listen to her or risk a grade penalty.
    – Dan Romik
    1 hour ago










  • @DanRomik I am not sure how note taking fits with good manners, but I think of a syllabus as being as being as close as most classes get to a learning contract. A chair or a colleague might suggest not to do that in the future, but it is not so egregious that a chair should step in.
    – StrongBad
    27 mins ago















up vote
18
down vote














The only relevant section in the syllabus says, "Good manners provide the foundation for proper classroom behavior: arrive on time, listen attentively and take detailed notes, remain quietly in your seat until dismissed by the instructor." There is a strict no-screen policy, but nothing about reading.




I am pretty sure that all department chairs would agree with a faculty member who concluded that reading in class is the opposite of listen attentively and take detailed notes. I would put your chances at exactly zero that the chair would override the decision to not credit you with attendance on that day, but marking you as absent for two days does not seem justified unless there is another penalty for not following proper classroom behavior.






share|improve this answer





















  • Would all department chairs also agree that “take detailed notes” has anything whatsoever to do with either “good manners” or “proper classroom behavior”? I’m not so sure (in fact, as a former department chair I’m pretty sure I would not agree to those assertions). Moreover, I’m not sure I’d agree that a professor has the authority to mandate her students to listen to her or risk a grade penalty.
    – Dan Romik
    1 hour ago










  • @DanRomik I am not sure how note taking fits with good manners, but I think of a syllabus as being as being as close as most classes get to a learning contract. A chair or a colleague might suggest not to do that in the future, but it is not so egregious that a chair should step in.
    – StrongBad
    27 mins ago













up vote
18
down vote










up vote
18
down vote










The only relevant section in the syllabus says, "Good manners provide the foundation for proper classroom behavior: arrive on time, listen attentively and take detailed notes, remain quietly in your seat until dismissed by the instructor." There is a strict no-screen policy, but nothing about reading.




I am pretty sure that all department chairs would agree with a faculty member who concluded that reading in class is the opposite of listen attentively and take detailed notes. I would put your chances at exactly zero that the chair would override the decision to not credit you with attendance on that day, but marking you as absent for two days does not seem justified unless there is another penalty for not following proper classroom behavior.






share|improve this answer













The only relevant section in the syllabus says, "Good manners provide the foundation for proper classroom behavior: arrive on time, listen attentively and take detailed notes, remain quietly in your seat until dismissed by the instructor." There is a strict no-screen policy, but nothing about reading.




I am pretty sure that all department chairs would agree with a faculty member who concluded that reading in class is the opposite of listen attentively and take detailed notes. I would put your chances at exactly zero that the chair would override the decision to not credit you with attendance on that day, but marking you as absent for two days does not seem justified unless there is another penalty for not following proper classroom behavior.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









StrongBad

80.3k22203403




80.3k22203403












  • Would all department chairs also agree that “take detailed notes” has anything whatsoever to do with either “good manners” or “proper classroom behavior”? I’m not so sure (in fact, as a former department chair I’m pretty sure I would not agree to those assertions). Moreover, I’m not sure I’d agree that a professor has the authority to mandate her students to listen to her or risk a grade penalty.
    – Dan Romik
    1 hour ago










  • @DanRomik I am not sure how note taking fits with good manners, but I think of a syllabus as being as being as close as most classes get to a learning contract. A chair or a colleague might suggest not to do that in the future, but it is not so egregious that a chair should step in.
    – StrongBad
    27 mins ago


















  • Would all department chairs also agree that “take detailed notes” has anything whatsoever to do with either “good manners” or “proper classroom behavior”? I’m not so sure (in fact, as a former department chair I’m pretty sure I would not agree to those assertions). Moreover, I’m not sure I’d agree that a professor has the authority to mandate her students to listen to her or risk a grade penalty.
    – Dan Romik
    1 hour ago










  • @DanRomik I am not sure how note taking fits with good manners, but I think of a syllabus as being as being as close as most classes get to a learning contract. A chair or a colleague might suggest not to do that in the future, but it is not so egregious that a chair should step in.
    – StrongBad
    27 mins ago
















Would all department chairs also agree that “take detailed notes” has anything whatsoever to do with either “good manners” or “proper classroom behavior”? I’m not so sure (in fact, as a former department chair I’m pretty sure I would not agree to those assertions). Moreover, I’m not sure I’d agree that a professor has the authority to mandate her students to listen to her or risk a grade penalty.
– Dan Romik
1 hour ago




Would all department chairs also agree that “take detailed notes” has anything whatsoever to do with either “good manners” or “proper classroom behavior”? I’m not so sure (in fact, as a former department chair I’m pretty sure I would not agree to those assertions). Moreover, I’m not sure I’d agree that a professor has the authority to mandate her students to listen to her or risk a grade penalty.
– Dan Romik
1 hour ago












@DanRomik I am not sure how note taking fits with good manners, but I think of a syllabus as being as being as close as most classes get to a learning contract. A chair or a colleague might suggest not to do that in the future, but it is not so egregious that a chair should step in.
– StrongBad
27 mins ago




@DanRomik I am not sure how note taking fits with good manners, but I think of a syllabus as being as being as close as most classes get to a learning contract. A chair or a colleague might suggest not to do that in the future, but it is not so egregious that a chair should step in.
– StrongBad
27 mins ago










up vote
3
down vote













Your best chance is to ask for probation, but you must also admit a no-brainer. It's all in here, try this:




"I am writing concerning the two absences I was deducted on account of reading unrelated textbooks during class. I request probation to have the statutory absences removed, but only on the condition that during finals I present responsible class notes for the remainder of the semester. As an engineering student, I should know that reading a textbook applies to the same principle as a the policy ban on mobile screens in class. Though this is an introductory class, covering information with which I consider myself to be familiar, I will hold a newfound respect for the importance of both foundational skills and the demonstrable pedagogical value of reviewing them. My grades are of concern to me, so if you as the lecturing professor will not grant me an achievable probation, I will appeal by forwarding this same letter to the department chair, but no higher."







share|improve this answer








New contributor




Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 2




    This isn't bad, but I would be more concise, less sesquipedalian, and would certainly avoid the threat in the last sentence. Something like "I am writing to apologize for reading textbooks during class. My only excuse is that I was already familiar with the particular material you were presenting on the day in question. But of course I now realize that this is not allowed. I would really appreciate it if you would reconsider penalizing my attendance over this matter. I will certainly not do it again."
    – cag51
    2 hours ago












  • @cag51 I respect your rep, you have good points. The goal is to help a student learn and get these absences reversed fairly. Being sesquipedalian could go either way. IMHE some profs like big words and especially respect students who consider pedagogical method. Academic rule #1 is that we don't know until we try. I use use Satir's "Computer Mode", which is often wise. IMHO, I only disagree: 1. you defend, then concede; that's Satir's "Placater Mode", seems good, won't work, 2. the final is no threat, but a needed reminder of process, prerogative, what next, and self-limit; respectful overall.
    – Jesse Steele
    1 hour ago










  • ...If you have a right to appeal, always remind everyone of that in a respectful, matter-of-fact way. Even if the person you disagree with "feels" threatened, they aren't allowed to say so because it is a matter of rights and procedure. Omit the part about your rights and you're toast; this isn't theoretical, it's experience. Respect comes from the overall tone. This letter clearly regards the prof as mostly in the right and does not bow. That's the best change.
    – Jesse Steele
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    Thanks for explanation. I admit I was thinking mostly about what I would find most compelling if I were the teacher (this draft would really rub me the wrong way), but, on the other hand, I really disagree with this professor's policy, so fair to say that my reaction to the letter might not be a fair gauge of this professor's reaction. In any case, time for me to go read about Satir's modes :-)
    – cag51
    1 hour ago












  • @cag51 And your comments also, ty. I might edit/add some "diplomacy explanation" to my answer later. I had some links to Satir here: interpersonal.stackexchange.com/q/20022/22996. On my phone, ttyl
    – Jesse Steele
    1 hour ago















up vote
3
down vote













Your best chance is to ask for probation, but you must also admit a no-brainer. It's all in here, try this:




"I am writing concerning the two absences I was deducted on account of reading unrelated textbooks during class. I request probation to have the statutory absences removed, but only on the condition that during finals I present responsible class notes for the remainder of the semester. As an engineering student, I should know that reading a textbook applies to the same principle as a the policy ban on mobile screens in class. Though this is an introductory class, covering information with which I consider myself to be familiar, I will hold a newfound respect for the importance of both foundational skills and the demonstrable pedagogical value of reviewing them. My grades are of concern to me, so if you as the lecturing professor will not grant me an achievable probation, I will appeal by forwarding this same letter to the department chair, but no higher."







share|improve this answer








New contributor




Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 2




    This isn't bad, but I would be more concise, less sesquipedalian, and would certainly avoid the threat in the last sentence. Something like "I am writing to apologize for reading textbooks during class. My only excuse is that I was already familiar with the particular material you were presenting on the day in question. But of course I now realize that this is not allowed. I would really appreciate it if you would reconsider penalizing my attendance over this matter. I will certainly not do it again."
    – cag51
    2 hours ago












  • @cag51 I respect your rep, you have good points. The goal is to help a student learn and get these absences reversed fairly. Being sesquipedalian could go either way. IMHE some profs like big words and especially respect students who consider pedagogical method. Academic rule #1 is that we don't know until we try. I use use Satir's "Computer Mode", which is often wise. IMHO, I only disagree: 1. you defend, then concede; that's Satir's "Placater Mode", seems good, won't work, 2. the final is no threat, but a needed reminder of process, prerogative, what next, and self-limit; respectful overall.
    – Jesse Steele
    1 hour ago










  • ...If you have a right to appeal, always remind everyone of that in a respectful, matter-of-fact way. Even if the person you disagree with "feels" threatened, they aren't allowed to say so because it is a matter of rights and procedure. Omit the part about your rights and you're toast; this isn't theoretical, it's experience. Respect comes from the overall tone. This letter clearly regards the prof as mostly in the right and does not bow. That's the best change.
    – Jesse Steele
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    Thanks for explanation. I admit I was thinking mostly about what I would find most compelling if I were the teacher (this draft would really rub me the wrong way), but, on the other hand, I really disagree with this professor's policy, so fair to say that my reaction to the letter might not be a fair gauge of this professor's reaction. In any case, time for me to go read about Satir's modes :-)
    – cag51
    1 hour ago












  • @cag51 And your comments also, ty. I might edit/add some "diplomacy explanation" to my answer later. I had some links to Satir here: interpersonal.stackexchange.com/q/20022/22996. On my phone, ttyl
    – Jesse Steele
    1 hour ago













up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote









Your best chance is to ask for probation, but you must also admit a no-brainer. It's all in here, try this:




"I am writing concerning the two absences I was deducted on account of reading unrelated textbooks during class. I request probation to have the statutory absences removed, but only on the condition that during finals I present responsible class notes for the remainder of the semester. As an engineering student, I should know that reading a textbook applies to the same principle as a the policy ban on mobile screens in class. Though this is an introductory class, covering information with which I consider myself to be familiar, I will hold a newfound respect for the importance of both foundational skills and the demonstrable pedagogical value of reviewing them. My grades are of concern to me, so if you as the lecturing professor will not grant me an achievable probation, I will appeal by forwarding this same letter to the department chair, but no higher."







share|improve this answer








New contributor




Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









Your best chance is to ask for probation, but you must also admit a no-brainer. It's all in here, try this:




"I am writing concerning the two absences I was deducted on account of reading unrelated textbooks during class. I request probation to have the statutory absences removed, but only on the condition that during finals I present responsible class notes for the remainder of the semester. As an engineering student, I should know that reading a textbook applies to the same principle as a the policy ban on mobile screens in class. Though this is an introductory class, covering information with which I consider myself to be familiar, I will hold a newfound respect for the importance of both foundational skills and the demonstrable pedagogical value of reviewing them. My grades are of concern to me, so if you as the lecturing professor will not grant me an achievable probation, I will appeal by forwarding this same letter to the department chair, but no higher."








share|improve this answer








New contributor




Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 3 hours ago









Jesse Steele

1314




1314




New contributor




Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Jesse Steele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 2




    This isn't bad, but I would be more concise, less sesquipedalian, and would certainly avoid the threat in the last sentence. Something like "I am writing to apologize for reading textbooks during class. My only excuse is that I was already familiar with the particular material you were presenting on the day in question. But of course I now realize that this is not allowed. I would really appreciate it if you would reconsider penalizing my attendance over this matter. I will certainly not do it again."
    – cag51
    2 hours ago












  • @cag51 I respect your rep, you have good points. The goal is to help a student learn and get these absences reversed fairly. Being sesquipedalian could go either way. IMHE some profs like big words and especially respect students who consider pedagogical method. Academic rule #1 is that we don't know until we try. I use use Satir's "Computer Mode", which is often wise. IMHO, I only disagree: 1. you defend, then concede; that's Satir's "Placater Mode", seems good, won't work, 2. the final is no threat, but a needed reminder of process, prerogative, what next, and self-limit; respectful overall.
    – Jesse Steele
    1 hour ago










  • ...If you have a right to appeal, always remind everyone of that in a respectful, matter-of-fact way. Even if the person you disagree with "feels" threatened, they aren't allowed to say so because it is a matter of rights and procedure. Omit the part about your rights and you're toast; this isn't theoretical, it's experience. Respect comes from the overall tone. This letter clearly regards the prof as mostly in the right and does not bow. That's the best change.
    – Jesse Steele
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    Thanks for explanation. I admit I was thinking mostly about what I would find most compelling if I were the teacher (this draft would really rub me the wrong way), but, on the other hand, I really disagree with this professor's policy, so fair to say that my reaction to the letter might not be a fair gauge of this professor's reaction. In any case, time for me to go read about Satir's modes :-)
    – cag51
    1 hour ago












  • @cag51 And your comments also, ty. I might edit/add some "diplomacy explanation" to my answer later. I had some links to Satir here: interpersonal.stackexchange.com/q/20022/22996. On my phone, ttyl
    – Jesse Steele
    1 hour ago














  • 2




    This isn't bad, but I would be more concise, less sesquipedalian, and would certainly avoid the threat in the last sentence. Something like "I am writing to apologize for reading textbooks during class. My only excuse is that I was already familiar with the particular material you were presenting on the day in question. But of course I now realize that this is not allowed. I would really appreciate it if you would reconsider penalizing my attendance over this matter. I will certainly not do it again."
    – cag51
    2 hours ago












  • @cag51 I respect your rep, you have good points. The goal is to help a student learn and get these absences reversed fairly. Being sesquipedalian could go either way. IMHE some profs like big words and especially respect students who consider pedagogical method. Academic rule #1 is that we don't know until we try. I use use Satir's "Computer Mode", which is often wise. IMHO, I only disagree: 1. you defend, then concede; that's Satir's "Placater Mode", seems good, won't work, 2. the final is no threat, but a needed reminder of process, prerogative, what next, and self-limit; respectful overall.
    – Jesse Steele
    1 hour ago










  • ...If you have a right to appeal, always remind everyone of that in a respectful, matter-of-fact way. Even if the person you disagree with "feels" threatened, they aren't allowed to say so because it is a matter of rights and procedure. Omit the part about your rights and you're toast; this isn't theoretical, it's experience. Respect comes from the overall tone. This letter clearly regards the prof as mostly in the right and does not bow. That's the best change.
    – Jesse Steele
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    Thanks for explanation. I admit I was thinking mostly about what I would find most compelling if I were the teacher (this draft would really rub me the wrong way), but, on the other hand, I really disagree with this professor's policy, so fair to say that my reaction to the letter might not be a fair gauge of this professor's reaction. In any case, time for me to go read about Satir's modes :-)
    – cag51
    1 hour ago












  • @cag51 And your comments also, ty. I might edit/add some "diplomacy explanation" to my answer later. I had some links to Satir here: interpersonal.stackexchange.com/q/20022/22996. On my phone, ttyl
    – Jesse Steele
    1 hour ago








2




2




This isn't bad, but I would be more concise, less sesquipedalian, and would certainly avoid the threat in the last sentence. Something like "I am writing to apologize for reading textbooks during class. My only excuse is that I was already familiar with the particular material you were presenting on the day in question. But of course I now realize that this is not allowed. I would really appreciate it if you would reconsider penalizing my attendance over this matter. I will certainly not do it again."
– cag51
2 hours ago






This isn't bad, but I would be more concise, less sesquipedalian, and would certainly avoid the threat in the last sentence. Something like "I am writing to apologize for reading textbooks during class. My only excuse is that I was already familiar with the particular material you were presenting on the day in question. But of course I now realize that this is not allowed. I would really appreciate it if you would reconsider penalizing my attendance over this matter. I will certainly not do it again."
– cag51
2 hours ago














@cag51 I respect your rep, you have good points. The goal is to help a student learn and get these absences reversed fairly. Being sesquipedalian could go either way. IMHE some profs like big words and especially respect students who consider pedagogical method. Academic rule #1 is that we don't know until we try. I use use Satir's "Computer Mode", which is often wise. IMHO, I only disagree: 1. you defend, then concede; that's Satir's "Placater Mode", seems good, won't work, 2. the final is no threat, but a needed reminder of process, prerogative, what next, and self-limit; respectful overall.
– Jesse Steele
1 hour ago




@cag51 I respect your rep, you have good points. The goal is to help a student learn and get these absences reversed fairly. Being sesquipedalian could go either way. IMHE some profs like big words and especially respect students who consider pedagogical method. Academic rule #1 is that we don't know until we try. I use use Satir's "Computer Mode", which is often wise. IMHO, I only disagree: 1. you defend, then concede; that's Satir's "Placater Mode", seems good, won't work, 2. the final is no threat, but a needed reminder of process, prerogative, what next, and self-limit; respectful overall.
– Jesse Steele
1 hour ago












...If you have a right to appeal, always remind everyone of that in a respectful, matter-of-fact way. Even if the person you disagree with "feels" threatened, they aren't allowed to say so because it is a matter of rights and procedure. Omit the part about your rights and you're toast; this isn't theoretical, it's experience. Respect comes from the overall tone. This letter clearly regards the prof as mostly in the right and does not bow. That's the best change.
– Jesse Steele
1 hour ago




...If you have a right to appeal, always remind everyone of that in a respectful, matter-of-fact way. Even if the person you disagree with "feels" threatened, they aren't allowed to say so because it is a matter of rights and procedure. Omit the part about your rights and you're toast; this isn't theoretical, it's experience. Respect comes from the overall tone. This letter clearly regards the prof as mostly in the right and does not bow. That's the best change.
– Jesse Steele
1 hour ago




1




1




Thanks for explanation. I admit I was thinking mostly about what I would find most compelling if I were the teacher (this draft would really rub me the wrong way), but, on the other hand, I really disagree with this professor's policy, so fair to say that my reaction to the letter might not be a fair gauge of this professor's reaction. In any case, time for me to go read about Satir's modes :-)
– cag51
1 hour ago






Thanks for explanation. I admit I was thinking mostly about what I would find most compelling if I were the teacher (this draft would really rub me the wrong way), but, on the other hand, I really disagree with this professor's policy, so fair to say that my reaction to the letter might not be a fair gauge of this professor's reaction. In any case, time for me to go read about Satir's modes :-)
– cag51
1 hour ago














@cag51 And your comments also, ty. I might edit/add some "diplomacy explanation" to my answer later. I had some links to Satir here: interpersonal.stackexchange.com/q/20022/22996. On my phone, ttyl
– Jesse Steele
1 hour ago




@cag51 And your comments also, ty. I might edit/add some "diplomacy explanation" to my answer later. I had some links to Satir here: interpersonal.stackexchange.com/q/20022/22996. On my phone, ttyl
– Jesse Steele
1 hour ago










up vote
1
down vote













I would still take it up the ladder since that sounds like a stupid policy.



In my opinion, if she's not able to keep your interest, she should consider raising the level of the class, but there's only so much she can raise it without losing other students. It's not always possible to keep everyone's interest and you can't expect students to feign interest because it makes you feel important.



What does she care if you're quietly reading? It sounds like she childishly wants to be listened to. That's beyond wanting "good manners". She wants devotion.



You might as well complain to her dean. Even if you don't get what you want, if enough people complain, it's at least annoying for the dean who might pass the message on to her in one way or another.






share|improve this answer





















  • It may be a reaction to past problems - students not being aware of important information because, even though physically present, they were mentally absent.
    – Patricia Shanahan
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    @PatriciaShanahan Most classes factor that kind of problem into grades using examinations rather than attendance.
    – Neil G
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    I agree that it is an unwise policy, but most universities will give their professor's considerable latitude and discretion. Something can be unwise, even clearly unwise, and still be well within a decision maker's authority.
    – TimothyAWiseman
    2 hours ago










  • I agree with both of you -- escalating is unlikely to get your points back, but this is such a stupid policy (insisting that your students waste time listening to material they already know) that I would still send a complaint anyway. (Though, groveling to the instructor to try to get the points back might be necessary until grades are finalized)
    – cag51
    2 hours ago

















up vote
1
down vote













I would still take it up the ladder since that sounds like a stupid policy.



In my opinion, if she's not able to keep your interest, she should consider raising the level of the class, but there's only so much she can raise it without losing other students. It's not always possible to keep everyone's interest and you can't expect students to feign interest because it makes you feel important.



What does she care if you're quietly reading? It sounds like she childishly wants to be listened to. That's beyond wanting "good manners". She wants devotion.



You might as well complain to her dean. Even if you don't get what you want, if enough people complain, it's at least annoying for the dean who might pass the message on to her in one way or another.






share|improve this answer





















  • It may be a reaction to past problems - students not being aware of important information because, even though physically present, they were mentally absent.
    – Patricia Shanahan
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    @PatriciaShanahan Most classes factor that kind of problem into grades using examinations rather than attendance.
    – Neil G
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    I agree that it is an unwise policy, but most universities will give their professor's considerable latitude and discretion. Something can be unwise, even clearly unwise, and still be well within a decision maker's authority.
    – TimothyAWiseman
    2 hours ago










  • I agree with both of you -- escalating is unlikely to get your points back, but this is such a stupid policy (insisting that your students waste time listening to material they already know) that I would still send a complaint anyway. (Though, groveling to the instructor to try to get the points back might be necessary until grades are finalized)
    – cag51
    2 hours ago















up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









I would still take it up the ladder since that sounds like a stupid policy.



In my opinion, if she's not able to keep your interest, she should consider raising the level of the class, but there's only so much she can raise it without losing other students. It's not always possible to keep everyone's interest and you can't expect students to feign interest because it makes you feel important.



What does she care if you're quietly reading? It sounds like she childishly wants to be listened to. That's beyond wanting "good manners". She wants devotion.



You might as well complain to her dean. Even if you don't get what you want, if enough people complain, it's at least annoying for the dean who might pass the message on to her in one way or another.






share|improve this answer












I would still take it up the ladder since that sounds like a stupid policy.



In my opinion, if she's not able to keep your interest, she should consider raising the level of the class, but there's only so much she can raise it without losing other students. It's not always possible to keep everyone's interest and you can't expect students to feign interest because it makes you feel important.



What does she care if you're quietly reading? It sounds like she childishly wants to be listened to. That's beyond wanting "good manners". She wants devotion.



You might as well complain to her dean. Even if you don't get what you want, if enough people complain, it's at least annoying for the dean who might pass the message on to her in one way or another.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









Neil G

36727




36727












  • It may be a reaction to past problems - students not being aware of important information because, even though physically present, they were mentally absent.
    – Patricia Shanahan
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    @PatriciaShanahan Most classes factor that kind of problem into grades using examinations rather than attendance.
    – Neil G
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    I agree that it is an unwise policy, but most universities will give their professor's considerable latitude and discretion. Something can be unwise, even clearly unwise, and still be well within a decision maker's authority.
    – TimothyAWiseman
    2 hours ago










  • I agree with both of you -- escalating is unlikely to get your points back, but this is such a stupid policy (insisting that your students waste time listening to material they already know) that I would still send a complaint anyway. (Though, groveling to the instructor to try to get the points back might be necessary until grades are finalized)
    – cag51
    2 hours ago




















  • It may be a reaction to past problems - students not being aware of important information because, even though physically present, they were mentally absent.
    – Patricia Shanahan
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    @PatriciaShanahan Most classes factor that kind of problem into grades using examinations rather than attendance.
    – Neil G
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    I agree that it is an unwise policy, but most universities will give their professor's considerable latitude and discretion. Something can be unwise, even clearly unwise, and still be well within a decision maker's authority.
    – TimothyAWiseman
    2 hours ago










  • I agree with both of you -- escalating is unlikely to get your points back, but this is such a stupid policy (insisting that your students waste time listening to material they already know) that I would still send a complaint anyway. (Though, groveling to the instructor to try to get the points back might be necessary until grades are finalized)
    – cag51
    2 hours ago


















It may be a reaction to past problems - students not being aware of important information because, even though physically present, they were mentally absent.
– Patricia Shanahan
2 hours ago




It may be a reaction to past problems - students not being aware of important information because, even though physically present, they were mentally absent.
– Patricia Shanahan
2 hours ago




3




3




@PatriciaShanahan Most classes factor that kind of problem into grades using examinations rather than attendance.
– Neil G
2 hours ago




@PatriciaShanahan Most classes factor that kind of problem into grades using examinations rather than attendance.
– Neil G
2 hours ago




3




3




I agree that it is an unwise policy, but most universities will give their professor's considerable latitude and discretion. Something can be unwise, even clearly unwise, and still be well within a decision maker's authority.
– TimothyAWiseman
2 hours ago




I agree that it is an unwise policy, but most universities will give their professor's considerable latitude and discretion. Something can be unwise, even clearly unwise, and still be well within a decision maker's authority.
– TimothyAWiseman
2 hours ago












I agree with both of you -- escalating is unlikely to get your points back, but this is such a stupid policy (insisting that your students waste time listening to material they already know) that I would still send a complaint anyway. (Though, groveling to the instructor to try to get the points back might be necessary until grades are finalized)
– cag51
2 hours ago






I agree with both of you -- escalating is unlikely to get your points back, but this is such a stupid policy (insisting that your students waste time listening to material they already know) that I would still send a complaint anyway. (Though, groveling to the instructor to try to get the points back might be necessary until grades are finalized)
– cag51
2 hours ago












Irritated is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Irritated is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Irritated is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Irritated is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f120877%2fdispute-grade-penalty-for-reading-in-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Eastern Orthodox Church

Understanding the information contained in the Deep Space Network XML data?

Zagreb