My programmer underestimate deadlines or it's just lazy
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
Since august, I have a software programmer at my charge and I became the project leader of my area.
She went well with learning things about our area, configuring some tasks, but ever since I started to ask her more complex things (to be specific, complex in the sense, understand sql functions and how the back end of a application works) is when my problems got started
First of all, I think she underestimates the complexity of the tasks, then I believe she becames secure and stretchs her schedule doing the bare minimum till I ask her how she goes; for example she does not implement her changes in the development enviroment, she just goes "I'm just testing things here in my sql session" like some querys on the fly without testing the project as a whole (I assured her that she can do and test whatever she wants in development enviroment)
Wednesdays are the days that new releases are made, so I told her days ago check with time her development with the entire project, not just use the monday and tuesday to adjust things. Today friday she implemented her changes and of course, in development environment everything crashed
This is not the first time she went like this. My specific question is, with that personality should I implement with her a sort of specific scrum for her? we use waterfall because our projects are small; I'm thinking about sitting with her 15 minutes a day to ask her about her progress.
This is not what we use to do, we normally just set deadlines and set a Gantt diagram, I'm not saying every other developer is perfect but her case is very isolated, she only had that task and previously I rest assured that she understood how the project works and I tried to respond her questions as clear as possible
performance employees deadlines
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
Since august, I have a software programmer at my charge and I became the project leader of my area.
She went well with learning things about our area, configuring some tasks, but ever since I started to ask her more complex things (to be specific, complex in the sense, understand sql functions and how the back end of a application works) is when my problems got started
First of all, I think she underestimates the complexity of the tasks, then I believe she becames secure and stretchs her schedule doing the bare minimum till I ask her how she goes; for example she does not implement her changes in the development enviroment, she just goes "I'm just testing things here in my sql session" like some querys on the fly without testing the project as a whole (I assured her that she can do and test whatever she wants in development enviroment)
Wednesdays are the days that new releases are made, so I told her days ago check with time her development with the entire project, not just use the monday and tuesday to adjust things. Today friday she implemented her changes and of course, in development environment everything crashed
This is not the first time she went like this. My specific question is, with that personality should I implement with her a sort of specific scrum for her? we use waterfall because our projects are small; I'm thinking about sitting with her 15 minutes a day to ask her about her progress.
This is not what we use to do, we normally just set deadlines and set a Gantt diagram, I'm not saying every other developer is perfect but her case is very isolated, she only had that task and previously I rest assured that she understood how the project works and I tried to respond her questions as clear as possible
performance employees deadlines
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
Since august, I have a software programmer at my charge and I became the project leader of my area.
She went well with learning things about our area, configuring some tasks, but ever since I started to ask her more complex things (to be specific, complex in the sense, understand sql functions and how the back end of a application works) is when my problems got started
First of all, I think she underestimates the complexity of the tasks, then I believe she becames secure and stretchs her schedule doing the bare minimum till I ask her how she goes; for example she does not implement her changes in the development enviroment, she just goes "I'm just testing things here in my sql session" like some querys on the fly without testing the project as a whole (I assured her that she can do and test whatever she wants in development enviroment)
Wednesdays are the days that new releases are made, so I told her days ago check with time her development with the entire project, not just use the monday and tuesday to adjust things. Today friday she implemented her changes and of course, in development environment everything crashed
This is not the first time she went like this. My specific question is, with that personality should I implement with her a sort of specific scrum for her? we use waterfall because our projects are small; I'm thinking about sitting with her 15 minutes a day to ask her about her progress.
This is not what we use to do, we normally just set deadlines and set a Gantt diagram, I'm not saying every other developer is perfect but her case is very isolated, she only had that task and previously I rest assured that she understood how the project works and I tried to respond her questions as clear as possible
performance employees deadlines
Since august, I have a software programmer at my charge and I became the project leader of my area.
She went well with learning things about our area, configuring some tasks, but ever since I started to ask her more complex things (to be specific, complex in the sense, understand sql functions and how the back end of a application works) is when my problems got started
First of all, I think she underestimates the complexity of the tasks, then I believe she becames secure and stretchs her schedule doing the bare minimum till I ask her how she goes; for example she does not implement her changes in the development enviroment, she just goes "I'm just testing things here in my sql session" like some querys on the fly without testing the project as a whole (I assured her that she can do and test whatever she wants in development enviroment)
Wednesdays are the days that new releases are made, so I told her days ago check with time her development with the entire project, not just use the monday and tuesday to adjust things. Today friday she implemented her changes and of course, in development environment everything crashed
This is not the first time she went like this. My specific question is, with that personality should I implement with her a sort of specific scrum for her? we use waterfall because our projects are small; I'm thinking about sitting with her 15 minutes a day to ask her about her progress.
This is not what we use to do, we normally just set deadlines and set a Gantt diagram, I'm not saying every other developer is perfect but her case is very isolated, she only had that task and previously I rest assured that she understood how the project works and I tried to respond her questions as clear as possible
performance employees deadlines
performance employees deadlines
asked 2 hours ago
Naty Bizz
1151
1151
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
-2
down vote
A simple solution is:
Every day at 10am and 4pm,
Review her work for ten minutes
Within two days either
She will get off her ass and start working or
You can let her go.
(The good news is in today's market any programmer, even a crap one, can get a new job in five minutes, so you never need to do any soul searching about terminating a contract or salary programmer.)
The "10/4" plan above is the only, repeat only, method to make slack programmers work.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
-2
down vote
A simple solution is:
Every day at 10am and 4pm,
Review her work for ten minutes
Within two days either
She will get off her ass and start working or
You can let her go.
(The good news is in today's market any programmer, even a crap one, can get a new job in five minutes, so you never need to do any soul searching about terminating a contract or salary programmer.)
The "10/4" plan above is the only, repeat only, method to make slack programmers work.
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
A simple solution is:
Every day at 10am and 4pm,
Review her work for ten minutes
Within two days either
She will get off her ass and start working or
You can let her go.
(The good news is in today's market any programmer, even a crap one, can get a new job in five minutes, so you never need to do any soul searching about terminating a contract or salary programmer.)
The "10/4" plan above is the only, repeat only, method to make slack programmers work.
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
up vote
-2
down vote
A simple solution is:
Every day at 10am and 4pm,
Review her work for ten minutes
Within two days either
She will get off her ass and start working or
You can let her go.
(The good news is in today's market any programmer, even a crap one, can get a new job in five minutes, so you never need to do any soul searching about terminating a contract or salary programmer.)
The "10/4" plan above is the only, repeat only, method to make slack programmers work.
A simple solution is:
Every day at 10am and 4pm,
Review her work for ten minutes
Within two days either
She will get off her ass and start working or
You can let her go.
(The good news is in today's market any programmer, even a crap one, can get a new job in five minutes, so you never need to do any soul searching about terminating a contract or salary programmer.)
The "10/4" plan above is the only, repeat only, method to make slack programmers work.
answered 1 hour ago
Fattie
6,50531322
6,50531322
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f123772%2fmy-programmer-underestimate-deadlines-or-its-just-lazy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown