Density matrix after measurement on density matrix











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let's say Alice wants to send Bob a $|0rangle$ with probability .5 and $|1rangle$ also with probability .5. So after a qubit Alice prepares leaves her lab, the system could be represented by the following density matrix: $$rho = .5 * |0rangle langle 0| + .5 * |1rangle langle 1|= begin{bmatrix} .5 & 0 \ 0 & .5 end{bmatrix} $$Am i right?



Then, Bob would perform measurement in the standard basis. This is where I get confused. For example, he could get $|0rangle$ with probability .5 and $|1rangle$ with .5. So what is the density matrix representing the state after Bob performs his measurement in the standard basis accounting for both of his possible outcomes?










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    You're confusing kets and the associated pure density matrices. Should be like $|0rangle langle 0 |$
    – AHusain
    7 hours ago

















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let's say Alice wants to send Bob a $|0rangle$ with probability .5 and $|1rangle$ also with probability .5. So after a qubit Alice prepares leaves her lab, the system could be represented by the following density matrix: $$rho = .5 * |0rangle langle 0| + .5 * |1rangle langle 1|= begin{bmatrix} .5 & 0 \ 0 & .5 end{bmatrix} $$Am i right?



Then, Bob would perform measurement in the standard basis. This is where I get confused. For example, he could get $|0rangle$ with probability .5 and $|1rangle$ with .5. So what is the density matrix representing the state after Bob performs his measurement in the standard basis accounting for both of his possible outcomes?










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    You're confusing kets and the associated pure density matrices. Should be like $|0rangle langle 0 |$
    – AHusain
    7 hours ago















up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Let's say Alice wants to send Bob a $|0rangle$ with probability .5 and $|1rangle$ also with probability .5. So after a qubit Alice prepares leaves her lab, the system could be represented by the following density matrix: $$rho = .5 * |0rangle langle 0| + .5 * |1rangle langle 1|= begin{bmatrix} .5 & 0 \ 0 & .5 end{bmatrix} $$Am i right?



Then, Bob would perform measurement in the standard basis. This is where I get confused. For example, he could get $|0rangle$ with probability .5 and $|1rangle$ with .5. So what is the density matrix representing the state after Bob performs his measurement in the standard basis accounting for both of his possible outcomes?










share|improve this question















Let's say Alice wants to send Bob a $|0rangle$ with probability .5 and $|1rangle$ also with probability .5. So after a qubit Alice prepares leaves her lab, the system could be represented by the following density matrix: $$rho = .5 * |0rangle langle 0| + .5 * |1rangle langle 1|= begin{bmatrix} .5 & 0 \ 0 & .5 end{bmatrix} $$Am i right?



Then, Bob would perform measurement in the standard basis. This is where I get confused. For example, he could get $|0rangle$ with probability .5 and $|1rangle$ with .5. So what is the density matrix representing the state after Bob performs his measurement in the standard basis accounting for both of his possible outcomes?







quantum-information measurement cryptography density-matrix






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago

























asked 7 hours ago









Hasan Iqbal

2636




2636








  • 1




    You're confusing kets and the associated pure density matrices. Should be like $|0rangle langle 0 |$
    – AHusain
    7 hours ago
















  • 1




    You're confusing kets and the associated pure density matrices. Should be like $|0rangle langle 0 |$
    – AHusain
    7 hours ago










1




1




You're confusing kets and the associated pure density matrices. Should be like $|0rangle langle 0 |$
– AHusain
7 hours ago






You're confusing kets and the associated pure density matrices. Should be like $|0rangle langle 0 |$
– AHusain
7 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










So, Bob is given the following state (also called the maximally-mixed state):



$rho = frac{1}{2}|0ranglelangle 0| + frac{1}{2}|1ranglelangle 1| = begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix}$



As you noticed, one nice feature of density matrices is they enable us to capture the uncertainty of an outcome of a measurement and account for the different possible outcomes in a single equation. Projective measurement is defined by a set of measurement operators $P_i$, one for each possible measurement outcome. For example, when measuring in the computational basis (collapsing to $|0rangle$ or $|1rangle$) we have the following measurement operators:



$P_0 = |0ranglelangle0| = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}$, $P_1 = |1ranglelangle1| = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix}$



where $P_0$ is associated with outcome $|0rangle$ and $P_1$ is associated with outcome $|1rangle$. These matrices are also called projectors.



Now, given a single-qbit density operator $rho$, we can calculate the probability of it collapsing to some value with the following formula:



$p_i = Tr(P_i rho)$



where $Tr(M)$ is the trace, which is the sum of the elements along the main diagonal of matrix $M$. So, we calculate the probability of your example collapsing to $|0rangle$ as follows:



$p_0 = Tr(P_0 rho)
= Tr left( begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} right)
= Tr left( begin{bmatrix} frac 1 2 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} right) = frac 1 2$



And the formula for the post-measurement density operator is:



$rho_i = frac{P_i rho P_i}{p_i}$



which in your example is:



$rho_0 = frac{begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}}{frac 1 2} = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}$



which is indeed the density matrix for the pure state $|0rangle$.



We don't just want the density operator for a certain measurement outcome, though - what we want is a density operator which captures the branching nature of measurement, representing it as an ensemble of possible collapsed states! For this, we use the following formula:



$rho' = sum_i p_i rho_i = sum_i P_i rho P_i$



in our example:



$rho' = left( begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} right) + left( begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix} right)$



$rho' = begin{bmatrix} frac 1 2 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}
+ begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & frac 1 2 end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} = frac{1}{2}|0ranglelangle 0| + frac{1}{2}|1ranglelangle 1|$



Your final density matrix is unchanged! This should actually be unsurprising, because we started out with the maximally-mixed state and performed a further randomizing operation on it.



Much of this answer copied from my previous detailed answer here, which in turn is based off of another answer here.






share|improve this answer























  • to tell you the truth, i suspected something like this, but was lacking the solidity present in your answer.
    – Hasan Iqbal
    5 hours ago


















up vote
2
down vote













So Alice sends Bob a qubit with the density matrix



$$rho = frac{1}{2}|0ranglelangle 0| + frac{1}{2}|1ranglelangle 1| = begin{bmatrix} .5 & 0 \ 0 & .5 end{bmatrix}$$



as you said. (I've fixed the notation to make it a density matrix, what you wrote was in the structure of a state, but with non-normalized coeffecients. It is important to note the distinction of pure states vs mixed states. What you are discussing is a mixed state and cannot be described as a single state $|psirangle$, mixed states can only be described in the density matrix picture.)



After measurement the state Bob has becomes a pure state, as you described. He gets either



$$|0rangle rightarrow rho = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}$$
or $$|1rangle rightarrow rho = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix}$$
with equal probability. As you can see once the qubit is measured you lose all indication that it was once in a mixed state or anything else about its history.






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "694"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f4834%2fdensity-matrix-after-measurement-on-density-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    So, Bob is given the following state (also called the maximally-mixed state):



    $rho = frac{1}{2}|0ranglelangle 0| + frac{1}{2}|1ranglelangle 1| = begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix}$



    As you noticed, one nice feature of density matrices is they enable us to capture the uncertainty of an outcome of a measurement and account for the different possible outcomes in a single equation. Projective measurement is defined by a set of measurement operators $P_i$, one for each possible measurement outcome. For example, when measuring in the computational basis (collapsing to $|0rangle$ or $|1rangle$) we have the following measurement operators:



    $P_0 = |0ranglelangle0| = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}$, $P_1 = |1ranglelangle1| = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix}$



    where $P_0$ is associated with outcome $|0rangle$ and $P_1$ is associated with outcome $|1rangle$. These matrices are also called projectors.



    Now, given a single-qbit density operator $rho$, we can calculate the probability of it collapsing to some value with the following formula:



    $p_i = Tr(P_i rho)$



    where $Tr(M)$ is the trace, which is the sum of the elements along the main diagonal of matrix $M$. So, we calculate the probability of your example collapsing to $|0rangle$ as follows:



    $p_0 = Tr(P_0 rho)
    = Tr left( begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} right)
    = Tr left( begin{bmatrix} frac 1 2 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} right) = frac 1 2$



    And the formula for the post-measurement density operator is:



    $rho_i = frac{P_i rho P_i}{p_i}$



    which in your example is:



    $rho_0 = frac{begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}}{frac 1 2} = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}$



    which is indeed the density matrix for the pure state $|0rangle$.



    We don't just want the density operator for a certain measurement outcome, though - what we want is a density operator which captures the branching nature of measurement, representing it as an ensemble of possible collapsed states! For this, we use the following formula:



    $rho' = sum_i p_i rho_i = sum_i P_i rho P_i$



    in our example:



    $rho' = left( begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} right) + left( begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix} right)$



    $rho' = begin{bmatrix} frac 1 2 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}
    + begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & frac 1 2 end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} = frac{1}{2}|0ranglelangle 0| + frac{1}{2}|1ranglelangle 1|$



    Your final density matrix is unchanged! This should actually be unsurprising, because we started out with the maximally-mixed state and performed a further randomizing operation on it.



    Much of this answer copied from my previous detailed answer here, which in turn is based off of another answer here.






    share|improve this answer























    • to tell you the truth, i suspected something like this, but was lacking the solidity present in your answer.
      – Hasan Iqbal
      5 hours ago















    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    So, Bob is given the following state (also called the maximally-mixed state):



    $rho = frac{1}{2}|0ranglelangle 0| + frac{1}{2}|1ranglelangle 1| = begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix}$



    As you noticed, one nice feature of density matrices is they enable us to capture the uncertainty of an outcome of a measurement and account for the different possible outcomes in a single equation. Projective measurement is defined by a set of measurement operators $P_i$, one for each possible measurement outcome. For example, when measuring in the computational basis (collapsing to $|0rangle$ or $|1rangle$) we have the following measurement operators:



    $P_0 = |0ranglelangle0| = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}$, $P_1 = |1ranglelangle1| = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix}$



    where $P_0$ is associated with outcome $|0rangle$ and $P_1$ is associated with outcome $|1rangle$. These matrices are also called projectors.



    Now, given a single-qbit density operator $rho$, we can calculate the probability of it collapsing to some value with the following formula:



    $p_i = Tr(P_i rho)$



    where $Tr(M)$ is the trace, which is the sum of the elements along the main diagonal of matrix $M$. So, we calculate the probability of your example collapsing to $|0rangle$ as follows:



    $p_0 = Tr(P_0 rho)
    = Tr left( begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} right)
    = Tr left( begin{bmatrix} frac 1 2 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} right) = frac 1 2$



    And the formula for the post-measurement density operator is:



    $rho_i = frac{P_i rho P_i}{p_i}$



    which in your example is:



    $rho_0 = frac{begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}}{frac 1 2} = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}$



    which is indeed the density matrix for the pure state $|0rangle$.



    We don't just want the density operator for a certain measurement outcome, though - what we want is a density operator which captures the branching nature of measurement, representing it as an ensemble of possible collapsed states! For this, we use the following formula:



    $rho' = sum_i p_i rho_i = sum_i P_i rho P_i$



    in our example:



    $rho' = left( begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} right) + left( begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix} right)$



    $rho' = begin{bmatrix} frac 1 2 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}
    + begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & frac 1 2 end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} = frac{1}{2}|0ranglelangle 0| + frac{1}{2}|1ranglelangle 1|$



    Your final density matrix is unchanged! This should actually be unsurprising, because we started out with the maximally-mixed state and performed a further randomizing operation on it.



    Much of this answer copied from my previous detailed answer here, which in turn is based off of another answer here.






    share|improve this answer























    • to tell you the truth, i suspected something like this, but was lacking the solidity present in your answer.
      – Hasan Iqbal
      5 hours ago













    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted






    So, Bob is given the following state (also called the maximally-mixed state):



    $rho = frac{1}{2}|0ranglelangle 0| + frac{1}{2}|1ranglelangle 1| = begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix}$



    As you noticed, one nice feature of density matrices is they enable us to capture the uncertainty of an outcome of a measurement and account for the different possible outcomes in a single equation. Projective measurement is defined by a set of measurement operators $P_i$, one for each possible measurement outcome. For example, when measuring in the computational basis (collapsing to $|0rangle$ or $|1rangle$) we have the following measurement operators:



    $P_0 = |0ranglelangle0| = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}$, $P_1 = |1ranglelangle1| = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix}$



    where $P_0$ is associated with outcome $|0rangle$ and $P_1$ is associated with outcome $|1rangle$. These matrices are also called projectors.



    Now, given a single-qbit density operator $rho$, we can calculate the probability of it collapsing to some value with the following formula:



    $p_i = Tr(P_i rho)$



    where $Tr(M)$ is the trace, which is the sum of the elements along the main diagonal of matrix $M$. So, we calculate the probability of your example collapsing to $|0rangle$ as follows:



    $p_0 = Tr(P_0 rho)
    = Tr left( begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} right)
    = Tr left( begin{bmatrix} frac 1 2 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} right) = frac 1 2$



    And the formula for the post-measurement density operator is:



    $rho_i = frac{P_i rho P_i}{p_i}$



    which in your example is:



    $rho_0 = frac{begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}}{frac 1 2} = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}$



    which is indeed the density matrix for the pure state $|0rangle$.



    We don't just want the density operator for a certain measurement outcome, though - what we want is a density operator which captures the branching nature of measurement, representing it as an ensemble of possible collapsed states! For this, we use the following formula:



    $rho' = sum_i p_i rho_i = sum_i P_i rho P_i$



    in our example:



    $rho' = left( begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} right) + left( begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix} right)$



    $rho' = begin{bmatrix} frac 1 2 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}
    + begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & frac 1 2 end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} = frac{1}{2}|0ranglelangle 0| + frac{1}{2}|1ranglelangle 1|$



    Your final density matrix is unchanged! This should actually be unsurprising, because we started out with the maximally-mixed state and performed a further randomizing operation on it.



    Much of this answer copied from my previous detailed answer here, which in turn is based off of another answer here.






    share|improve this answer














    So, Bob is given the following state (also called the maximally-mixed state):



    $rho = frac{1}{2}|0ranglelangle 0| + frac{1}{2}|1ranglelangle 1| = begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix}$



    As you noticed, one nice feature of density matrices is they enable us to capture the uncertainty of an outcome of a measurement and account for the different possible outcomes in a single equation. Projective measurement is defined by a set of measurement operators $P_i$, one for each possible measurement outcome. For example, when measuring in the computational basis (collapsing to $|0rangle$ or $|1rangle$) we have the following measurement operators:



    $P_0 = |0ranglelangle0| = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}$, $P_1 = |1ranglelangle1| = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix}$



    where $P_0$ is associated with outcome $|0rangle$ and $P_1$ is associated with outcome $|1rangle$. These matrices are also called projectors.



    Now, given a single-qbit density operator $rho$, we can calculate the probability of it collapsing to some value with the following formula:



    $p_i = Tr(P_i rho)$



    where $Tr(M)$ is the trace, which is the sum of the elements along the main diagonal of matrix $M$. So, we calculate the probability of your example collapsing to $|0rangle$ as follows:



    $p_0 = Tr(P_0 rho)
    = Tr left( begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} right)
    = Tr left( begin{bmatrix} frac 1 2 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} right) = frac 1 2$



    And the formula for the post-measurement density operator is:



    $rho_i = frac{P_i rho P_i}{p_i}$



    which in your example is:



    $rho_0 = frac{begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}}{frac 1 2} = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}$



    which is indeed the density matrix for the pure state $|0rangle$.



    We don't just want the density operator for a certain measurement outcome, though - what we want is a density operator which captures the branching nature of measurement, representing it as an ensemble of possible collapsed states! For this, we use the following formula:



    $rho' = sum_i p_i rho_i = sum_i P_i rho P_i$



    in our example:



    $rho' = left( begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix} right) + left( begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix} right)$



    $rho' = begin{bmatrix} frac 1 2 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}
    + begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & frac 1 2 end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} frac{1}{2} & 0 \ 0 & frac{1}{2} end{bmatrix} = frac{1}{2}|0ranglelangle 0| + frac{1}{2}|1ranglelangle 1|$



    Your final density matrix is unchanged! This should actually be unsurprising, because we started out with the maximally-mixed state and performed a further randomizing operation on it.



    Much of this answer copied from my previous detailed answer here, which in turn is based off of another answer here.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 5 hours ago

























    answered 5 hours ago









    ahelwer

    1,110112




    1,110112












    • to tell you the truth, i suspected something like this, but was lacking the solidity present in your answer.
      – Hasan Iqbal
      5 hours ago


















    • to tell you the truth, i suspected something like this, but was lacking the solidity present in your answer.
      – Hasan Iqbal
      5 hours ago
















    to tell you the truth, i suspected something like this, but was lacking the solidity present in your answer.
    – Hasan Iqbal
    5 hours ago




    to tell you the truth, i suspected something like this, but was lacking the solidity present in your answer.
    – Hasan Iqbal
    5 hours ago












    up vote
    2
    down vote













    So Alice sends Bob a qubit with the density matrix



    $$rho = frac{1}{2}|0ranglelangle 0| + frac{1}{2}|1ranglelangle 1| = begin{bmatrix} .5 & 0 \ 0 & .5 end{bmatrix}$$



    as you said. (I've fixed the notation to make it a density matrix, what you wrote was in the structure of a state, but with non-normalized coeffecients. It is important to note the distinction of pure states vs mixed states. What you are discussing is a mixed state and cannot be described as a single state $|psirangle$, mixed states can only be described in the density matrix picture.)



    After measurement the state Bob has becomes a pure state, as you described. He gets either



    $$|0rangle rightarrow rho = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}$$
    or $$|1rangle rightarrow rho = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix}$$
    with equal probability. As you can see once the qubit is measured you lose all indication that it was once in a mixed state or anything else about its history.






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      So Alice sends Bob a qubit with the density matrix



      $$rho = frac{1}{2}|0ranglelangle 0| + frac{1}{2}|1ranglelangle 1| = begin{bmatrix} .5 & 0 \ 0 & .5 end{bmatrix}$$



      as you said. (I've fixed the notation to make it a density matrix, what you wrote was in the structure of a state, but with non-normalized coeffecients. It is important to note the distinction of pure states vs mixed states. What you are discussing is a mixed state and cannot be described as a single state $|psirangle$, mixed states can only be described in the density matrix picture.)



      After measurement the state Bob has becomes a pure state, as you described. He gets either



      $$|0rangle rightarrow rho = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}$$
      or $$|1rangle rightarrow rho = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix}$$
      with equal probability. As you can see once the qubit is measured you lose all indication that it was once in a mixed state or anything else about its history.






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        So Alice sends Bob a qubit with the density matrix



        $$rho = frac{1}{2}|0ranglelangle 0| + frac{1}{2}|1ranglelangle 1| = begin{bmatrix} .5 & 0 \ 0 & .5 end{bmatrix}$$



        as you said. (I've fixed the notation to make it a density matrix, what you wrote was in the structure of a state, but with non-normalized coeffecients. It is important to note the distinction of pure states vs mixed states. What you are discussing is a mixed state and cannot be described as a single state $|psirangle$, mixed states can only be described in the density matrix picture.)



        After measurement the state Bob has becomes a pure state, as you described. He gets either



        $$|0rangle rightarrow rho = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}$$
        or $$|1rangle rightarrow rho = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix}$$
        with equal probability. As you can see once the qubit is measured you lose all indication that it was once in a mixed state or anything else about its history.






        share|improve this answer












        So Alice sends Bob a qubit with the density matrix



        $$rho = frac{1}{2}|0ranglelangle 0| + frac{1}{2}|1ranglelangle 1| = begin{bmatrix} .5 & 0 \ 0 & .5 end{bmatrix}$$



        as you said. (I've fixed the notation to make it a density matrix, what you wrote was in the structure of a state, but with non-normalized coeffecients. It is important to note the distinction of pure states vs mixed states. What you are discussing is a mixed state and cannot be described as a single state $|psirangle$, mixed states can only be described in the density matrix picture.)



        After measurement the state Bob has becomes a pure state, as you described. He gets either



        $$|0rangle rightarrow rho = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}$$
        or $$|1rangle rightarrow rho = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix}$$
        with equal probability. As you can see once the qubit is measured you lose all indication that it was once in a mixed state or anything else about its history.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 6 hours ago









        Dripto Debroy

        70519




        70519






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f4834%2fdensity-matrix-after-measurement-on-density-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            U.S. state

            Michael Jordan

            Prague